Re: [R-pkg-devel] [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission smotefamily 1.1

[Uwe Ligges]

1. We do not support devtools.

2. all warnings you mentioned below are crucial.
See inline below.


On 29.01.2018 16:07, Wacharasak Siriseriwan wrote:

Dear fellow develops

I'm the maintainer of package called "smotefamily. The CRAN teams
auto-check team has sent me about the checking result about my package and
found 3 warnings :

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... WARNING

Insufficient package version (submitted: 1.1, existing: 1.1)


Increase the version number?



CRAN repository db overrides:
   X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2018-01-23 as check problems were not
 corrected in time.

** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [24s] WARNING
Found the following significant warnings:
   Warning: items 'package:smotefamily' were removed from the search path
** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [26s] WARNING
Found the following significant warnings:
   Warning: items 'package:smotefamily' were removed from the search path


Do not remove items from the search path in your code.


Best,
Uwe Ligges




What are these warnings about and how are they to be fixed? These warnings
are crucial or not? I use dev-tools checking it before submission and it
passed all process.

Thank you in advance on your suggestion.



Wacharasak Siriseriwan 



On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:25 PM,  wrote:


Dear maintainer,

package smotefamily_1.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the pre-test at:

Status: 3 WARNINGs

Current CRAN status: OK: 2
See: 
If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
reply-all to this message and explain.

More details are given in the directory:

The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.


Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service




[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] licensing and releasing a package that copies code from dplyr

[Robert M. Flight]

Hi All,

hoping for some wisdom and guidance about licensing a package I created.

I created a package, knitrProgressBar (
https://github.com/rmflight/knitrProgressBar), that rips out the
dplyr::progress_estimated internal function into essentially it's own
package (to avoid some dependencies and do some custom things with it), and
then added some code for decision logic.

dplyr is licensed under MIT, with RStudio as the copyright holder, and
various individuals listed as authors under Authors@R.

I understand I would list myself as the "creator" in the Authors@R field
for knitrProgressBar, but I'm not sure who should be listed as authors and
copyright holders, and how this information needs to be incorporated into
the LICENSE file.

I would like to have everything squared away properly so that this package
can eventually be submitted and potentially available via CRAN.

Guidance would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,

-Robert

Robert M Flight, PhD
Bioinformatics Research Associate
Puller of Rabbits from Hats
Research Parasite
Resource Center for Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics
Manager, Systems Biology and Omics Integration Journal Club
Markey Cancer Center
CC434 Roach Building
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY

Twitter: @rmflight
Web: rmflight.github.io
ORCID: http://orcid.org/-0001-8141-7788
EM rfligh...@gmail.com
PH 502-509-1827 <(502)%20509-1827>

To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. - Ronald Fisher

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel