[Rd] R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
Full_Name: Hallgeir Grinde Version: 2.1.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (144.127.1.1) While using lm(y~(x*z*c*...*v)^2) R crashes/closes if the numbers of variables are at least 8. __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
R closes down while running the code described below. How i can get it to crash on your PC, i do not know... -Hallgeir Grinde > > While using lm(y~(x*z*c*...*v)^2) R crashes/closes if the numbers of variables > are at least 8. OK, let's try to reproduce that: > x1 <- runif(1000) > x2 <- runif(1000) > x3 <- runif(1000) > x4 <- runif(1000) > x5 <- runif(1000) > x6 <- runif(1000) > x7 <- runif(1000) > x8 <- runif(1000) > y <- rnorm(1000) > fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) No crash, a quite reasonable fit. Can we please have a reproducible example, as we do ask? -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 NOTICE Please immediately e-mail back to sender if you are not the intended recipient. Thereafter delete the e-mail along with any attachments without making copies. Elkem reserves all rights of privilege, confidentiality and copyright. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
Dette er en melding med flere deler i MIME-format. --=_alternative 004613C000257091_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" And some more informastion I forgot. R does not crash if I write out the formula: set.seed(123) x1 <- runif(1000) x2 <- runif(1000) x3 <- runif(1000) x4 <- runif(1000) x5 <- runif(1000) x6 <- runif(1000) x7 <- runif(1000) x8 <- runif(1000) y <- rnorm(1000) fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) -> R crashes fit <- lm(y~x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8 +x1:x2+x1:x3+x1:x4+x1:x5+x1:x6+x1:x7+x1:x8 +x2:x3++x2:x4+x2:x5+x2:x6+x2:x7+x2:x8 +x3:x4+x3:x5+x3:x6+x3:x7+x3:x8 +x4:x5+x4:x6+x4:x7+x4:x8 +x5:x6+x5:x7+x5:x8 +x6:x7+x6:x8 +x7:x8) -> R does not crash This is the same formula, at least it should be. Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05.10.2005 12:13 Til:Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: [Rd] R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180) Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Full_Name: Hallgeir Grinde >>Version: 2.1.1 >>OS: Windows XP >>Submission from: (NULL) (144.127.1.1) >> >> >>While using lm(y~(x*z*c*...*v)^2) R crashes/closes if the numbers of variables >>are at least 8. > > > OK, let's try to reproduce that: > > >>x1 <- runif(1000) >>x2 <- runif(1000) >>x3 <- runif(1000) >>x4 <- runif(1000) >>x5 <- runif(1000) >>x6 <- runif(1000) >>x7 <- runif(1000) >>x8 <- runif(1000) >>y <- rnorm(1000) >>fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) > > > No crash, a quite reasonable fit. > > Can we please have a reproducible example, as we do ask? > Hmm, crashes for me as well with R-2.1.1 and R-2.2.0 beta (2005-09-27 r35682M) on WinNT 4.0, SP6. Let's make it reproducible: set.seed(123) x1 <- runif(1000) x2 <- runif(1000) x3 <- runif(1000) x4 <- runif(1000) x5 <- runif(1000) x6 <- runif(1000) x7 <- runif(1000) x8 <- runif(1000) y <- rnorm(1000) fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) Uwe Ligges NOTICE Please immediately e-mail back to sender if you are not the intended recipient. Thereafter delete the e-mail along with any attachments without making copies. Elkem reserves all rights of privilege, confidentiality and copyright. --=_alternative 004613C000257091_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" And some more informastion I forgot. R does not crash if I write out the formula: set.seed(123) x1 <- runif(1000) x2 <- runif(1000) x3 <- runif(1000) x4 <- runif(1000) x5 <- runif(1000) x6 <- runif(1000) x7 <- runif(1000) x8 <- runif(1000) y <- rnorm(1000) fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) -> R crashes fit <- lm(y~x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8 +x1:x2+x1:x3+x1:x4+x1:x5+x1:x6+x1:x7+x1:x8 +x2:x3++x2:x4+x2:x5+x2:x6+x2:x7+x2:x8 +x3:x4+x3:x5+x3:x6+x3:x7+x3:x8 +x4:x5+x4:x6+x4:x7+x4:x8 +x5:x6+x5:x7+x5:x8 +x6:x7+x6:x8 +x7:x8) -> R does not crash This is the same formula, at least it should be. Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05.10.2005 12:13 Til: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: [Rd] R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180) Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Full_Name: Hallgeir Grinde >>Version: 2.1.1 >>OS: Windows XP >>Submission from: (NULL) (144.127.1.1) >> >> >>While using lm(y~(x*z*c*...*v)^2) R crashes/closes if the numbers of variables >>are at least 8. > > > OK, let's try to reproduce that: > > >>x1 <- runif(1000) >>x2 <- runif(1000) >>x3 <- runif(1000) >>x4 <- runif(1000) >>x5 <- runif(1000) >>x6 <- runif(1000) >>x7 <- runif(1000) >>x8 <- runif(1000) >>y <- rnorm(1000) >>fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) > > > No crash, a quite reasonable fit. > > Can we please have a reproducible example, as we do ask? > Hmm, crashes for me as well with R-2.1.1 and R-2.2.0 beta (2005-09-27 r35682M) on WinNT 4.0, SP6. Let's make it reproducible: set.seed(123) x1 <- runif(1000) x2 <- runif(1000) x3 <- runif(1000) x4 <- runif(1000) x5 <- runif(1000) x6 <- runif(1000) x7 <- runif
[Rd] Ad: Re: Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
Dette er en melding med flere deler i MIME-format. --=_alternative 004C4E4A00257091_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Yes. so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ? and there is a difference in (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 and (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8) althoug the resulting formulas are the same, or? This fikses my problem, but R still crashes for the large formula. It may be due to stack owerflow, but i guess this can be altered maually? Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05.10.2005 12:50 Til:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Ad: Re: [Rd] R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180) On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And some more informastion I forgot. > R does not crash if I write out the formula: > > set.seed(123) > x1 <- runif(1000) > x2 <- runif(1000) > x3 <- runif(1000) > x4 <- runif(1000) > x5 <- runif(1000) > x6 <- runif(1000) > x7 <- runif(1000) > x8 <- runif(1000) > y <- rnorm(1000) > fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) > -> R crashes > > fit <- lm(y~x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8 >+x1:x2+x1:x3+x1:x4+x1:x5+x1:x6+x1:x7+x1:x8 >+x2:x3++x2:x4+x2:x5+x2:x6+x2:x7+x2:x8 >+x3:x4+x3:x5+x3:x6+x3:x7+x3:x8 >+x4:x5+x4:x6+x4:x7+x4:x8 >+x5:x6+x5:x7+x5:x8 >+x6:x7+x6:x8 >+x7:x8) > -> R does not crash > This is the same formula, at least it should be. It is not the same formula at all. Try > terms(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2, simplify=TRUE) y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x1:x2 + x1:x3 + x1:x4 + x1:x5 + x1:x6 + x1:x7 + x1:x8 + x2:x3 + x2:x4 + x2:x5 + x2:x6 + x2:x7 + x2:x8 + x3:x4 + x3:x5 + x3:x6 + x3:x7 + x3:x8 + x4:x5 + x4:x6 + x4:x7 + x4:x8 + x5:x6 + x5:x7 + x5:x8 + x6:x7 + x6:x8 + x7:x8 + x1:x2:x3 + x1:x2:x4 + x1:x3:x4 + x1:x2:x5 + x1:x3:x5 + ... x1:x3:x4:x5:x6:x7:x8 + x2:x3:x4:x5:x6:x7:x8 + x1:x2:x3:x4:x5:x6:x7:x8 Did you actually want lm(y~(x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^2) ? > > > > > > Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 05.10.2005 12:13 > >Til:Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: [Rd] R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180) > > > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>> Full_Name: Hallgeir Grinde >>> Version: 2.1.1 >>> OS: Windows XP >>> Submission from: (NULL) (144.127.1.1) >>> >>> >>> While using lm(y~(x*z*c*...*v)^2) R crashes/closes if the numbers of > variables >>> are at least 8. >> >> >> OK, let's try to reproduce that: >> >> >>> x1 <- runif(1000) >>> x2 <- runif(1000) >>> x3 <- runif(1000) >>> x4 <- runif(1000) >>> x5 <- runif(1000) >>> x6 <- runif(1000) >>> x7 <- runif(1000) >>> x8 <- runif(1000) >>> y <- rnorm(1000) >>> fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) >> >> >> No crash, a quite reasonable fit. >> >> Can we please have a reproducible example, as we do ask? >> > > Hmm, crashes for me as well with R-2.1.1 and R-2.2.0 beta (2005-09-27 > r35682M) on WinNT 4.0, SP6. > > > Let's make it reproducible: > > set.seed(123) > x1 <- runif(1000) > x2 <- runif(1000) > x3 <- runif(1000) > x4 <- runif(1000) > x5 <- runif(1000) > x6 <- runif(1000) > x7 <- runif(1000) > x8 <- runif(1000) > y <- rnorm(1000) > fit <- lm(y~(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2) > > > Uwe Ligges > > > >NOTICE > Please immediately e-mail back to sender > if you are not the intended recipient. > > Thereafter delete the e-mail along with > any attachments without making copies. > > Elkem reserves all rights of privilege, > confidentiality and copyright. > > -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 --=_alternative 004C4E4A00257091_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Yes. so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ? and there is a difference in (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 and (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5