Re: [Rd] What is the best way to determine the version of an `.rds`?
Now infoRDS() reports all the meta-data from .Internal(serializeInfoFromConn()). Best Tomas On 7/15/19 12:01 PM, Jennifer Bryan wrote: Hi, I am writing a test that consults the serialization version of an `.rds` file. An attractive way to get this is: tools:::get_serialization_version() # reports just version which calls .Internal(serializeInfoFromConn() # reports much more but neither is truly exported for public use. Is there an official, exported way to get the serialization version? It is possible to get this information with R code yourself, but it doesn't feel very elegant. If not, could we have this? It's pretty easy these days to acquire a version 3 file, without real intent, which risks making the package require R >= 3.5. Thanks, Jenny [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Fwd: Bug Reporting
Dear Tommaso,
This is not a bug. You asked for a difference of 1 day = 24 hours = 1440
minutes = 86400 seconds. And that is the difference you get.
> start <- as.POSIXct(strptime("20151025",format='%Y%m%d'))
> end <- start + as.difftime(1, unit="days")
> end - start
Time difference of 1 days
> as.integer(end) - as.integer(start)
[1] 86400
Best regards,
ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Statisticus / Statistician
Vlaamse Overheid / Government of Flanders
INSTITUUT VOOR NATUUR- EN BOSONDERZOEK / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND
FOREST
Team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / Team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
thierry.onkel...@inbo.be
Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussel
www.inbo.be
///
To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey
///
Op wo 21 aug. 2019 om 08:25 schreef TOMMASO ADAMI :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to report this date/time bug that threatened me for a long
> time,
>as I need correct date calculation in my computations.
>
> If I add 1 day to the light saving switching day, it will incorrectly
> subtract 1 hour from the date and missalign all my calculations.
>
> You can see it runing (I am testing it with Rome, Italy (+1) TimeZone)
>
> print(paste0("Horrible R Bug is present?
> ",strptime("20151025",format='%Y%m%d')+as.difftime(1, unit="days")));
>
> As you can see the output says 11pm and not 12pm !
>
> I do not know if it is a requested feature, but for me is unpleasant and
> unexpected behaviour.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Is R-devel broken?
Hi, I'm building r-devel using [1], and I see: mv: './grid/vignettes/grid.Rnw-lattice' and './grid/vignettes/grid.Rnw' are the same file make[1]: *** [Makefile:121: vignettes-no-lattice] Error 1 Regards, Iñaki [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/rocker/r-devel/dockerfile __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Is R-devel broken?
Don't mind. It seems to be a caching issue in the underlying filesystem. Not sure how to solve it though. Iñaki On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 13:21, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm building r-devel using [1], and I see: > > mv: './grid/vignettes/grid.Rnw-lattice' and > './grid/vignettes/grid.Rnw' are the same file > make[1]: *** [Makefile:121: vignettes-no-lattice] Error 1 > > Regards, > Iñaki > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/rocker/r-devel/dockerfile -- Iñaki Úcar __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] --disable-long-double or --enable-long-double=no?
There's a bit of confusion about how to disable long double support in an R build. I see --disable-long-double scattered about, e.g. - R-exts: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Writing-portable-packages - R-admin: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#Solaris - CRAN noLD check description: https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/noLD/README.txt - ?capabilities: https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/capabilities.html However, it's *missing* from ./config (cd r-source && grep "disable-long-double" configure). Instead there appears to be some code built around enable-long-double: ./configure:1808: --enable-long-doubleuse long double type [yes] ./configure:24723:# Check whether --enable-long-double was given. I see the option apparently introduced here in 2012 & the ambiguity is immediate -- the commit mentions disable-long-double but builds enable-long-double. https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/fb8e36f8be0aaf47a9c54c9effb219dae34f0e41 Could someone please help to clear the confusion? Thanks Michael Chirico [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] --disable-long-double or --enable-long-double=no?
"--disable-long-double" is documented to work and works. "--enable-long-double=no" works as well. Please refer to Autoconf documentation (section 15.3), "--disable-feature is equivalent to --enable-feature=no" Best, Tomas On 8/21/19 2:40 PM, Michael Chirico wrote: > There's a bit of confusion about how to disable long double support in an R > build. > > I see --disable-long-double scattered about, e.g. > > - R-exts: > > https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Writing-portable-packages > - R-admin: > https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#Solaris > - CRAN noLD check description: > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/noLD/README.txt > - ?capabilities: > https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/capabilities.html > > However, it's *missing* from ./config (cd r-source && grep > "disable-long-double" configure). Instead there appears to be some code > built around enable-long-double: > > ./configure:1808: --enable-long-doubleuse long double type [yes] > > ./configure:24723:# Check whether --enable-long-double was given. > > I see the option apparently introduced here in 2012 & the ambiguity is > immediate -- the commit mentions disable-long-double but builds > enable-long-double. > > https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/fb8e36f8be0aaf47a9c54c9effb219dae34f0e41 > > Could someone please help to clear the confusion? > > Thanks > Michael Chirico > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > __ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
