Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c

2017-08-19 Thread Martin Maechler
> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel 
> on Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:44:06 + writes:

> Examples similar to
> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e9, min.n = 1)
> with smaller 'n':
> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e304, n = 1e5, min.n = 1)
> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e306, n = 1e3, min.n = 1)


Thank you.

"But" all these work now (in R-devel, rev >= 73094) as they should,
at least for me, right?

Are you mentioning the  "small n" examples so we could use them
as regression tests  (instead of the regression test I had added
to tests/reg-large.R  which needs enough GB and is slowish ) --
or are you seeing a platform where the above cases still don't
work in (new enough) R-devel ?


> A report on 'pretty' when working with integers, similar to what led to 
change of 'seq' fuzz, is 
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15137

> 
> On Tue, 15/8/17, Martin Maechler  wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
> To: "Martin Maechler" 

> @r-project.org
> Date: Tuesday, 15 August, 2017, 3:55 PM

> Martin Maechler 
>>      on Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:46:07 +0200 writes:

> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel 
>>      on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:11:06 + writes:
> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel 
>>      on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:11:06 + writes:

>     >> See https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-August/074746.html 
for the origin of the example here.

>     >> That
>     >> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e9, min.n = 1) gave 20 intervals, far 
from 1e9, but
>     >> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e6, min.n = 1) gave 100 intervals
>     >> (on a machine), made me trace through the code to function 
'R_pretty' in https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/appl/pretty.c .

>     > thank you.

>     >> *lo is -1e300, *up is 1e300.
>     >> cell = fmax2(fabs(*lo),fabs(*up));
>     >> 'cell' is 1e300.
>     >> i_small = dx < cell * U * imax2(1,*ndiv) * DBL_EPSILON *3;
>     >> When *ndiv is (int) 1e9, apparently cell * U * imax2(1,*ndiv) 
overflows to infinity and 'i_small' is 1 (true). It doesn't happen when *ndiv 
is (int) 1e6.

> [[elided Yahoo spam]]

>     >> Putting parentheses may avoid the floating point overflow. For 
example,
>     >> i_small = dx < cell * (U * imax2(1,*ndiv) * DBL_EPSILON) *3;

>     > yes... but only if the compiler optimization steps  "keep the 
parentheses".
>     > AFAIK, there is no guarantee for that.
>     > To make sure, I'd replace the above by

>     > U *= imax2(1,*ndiv) * DBL_EPSILON;
>     > i_small = dx < cell * U * 3;


>     >> The part
>     >> U = (1 + (h5 >= 1.5*h+.5)) ? 1/(1+h) : 1.5/(1+h5);
>     >> is strange. Because (h5 >= 1.5*h+.5) is 1 or 0, (1 + (h5 >= 
1.5*h+.5)) is never zero and 1/(1+h) will always be chosen.

> [[elided Yahoo spam]]
>     > here was as a change (not by me!) adding wrong parentheses
>     > there (or maybe adding what the previously "missing" parens
>     > implied, but not what they intended!).
>     > The original code had been
>      
>     > U = 1 + (h5 >= 1.5*h+.5) ? 1/(1+h) : 1.5/(1+h5);

>     > and "of course" was intended to mean

>     > U = 1 + ((h5 >= 1.5*h+.5) ? 1/(1+h) : 1.5/(1+h5));

>     > and this what I'll change it to, now.


>     >> The comment for 'rounding_eps' says "1e-7 is consistent with 
seq.default()". Currently, seq.default() uses 1e-10 as fuzz.

>     > Hmm, yes, thank you; this was correct when written,
>     > but seq.default had been changed in the mean time,
>     > namely in  svn r51095 | 2010-02-03

>     > Usually we are cautious / reluctant to change such things w/o
>     > any bug that we see to fix.
>     > OTOH, we did have  bug cases we'd wanted to amend for seq() /
>     > seq.int();
>     > and I'll look into updating the "pretty - epsilon" also to
>     > 1e-10.

> [[elided Yahoo spam]]

> I've committed now what I think has been suggested
> above ... to R-devel only :
> 
> r73094 | maechler | 2017-08-15 09:10:27 +0200 (Tue, 15. Aug 2017) | 1 
Zeile
> Geänderte Pfade:
>    M doc/NEWS.Rd
>    M src/appl/pretty.c
>    M src/main/engine.c
>    M tests/reg-large.R
>    M tests/reg-tests-2.Rout.save

> pretty(x, n) fix overflow for large n suggested by Suhartu Aggano, 
R-devel, 2017-08-11

> __
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



> 
> On Tue, 15/8/17, Martin Maechler  wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
> To: "Martin Maechler" 

> @r-project.org
> Date: Tuesda

Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c

2017-08-19 Thread Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel
Yes, they work now.

I mentioned them partly because the commit description said overflow for large 
n and partly to be considered for regression tests.


On Sat, 19/8/17, Martin Maechler  wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c

 Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
 Date: Saturday, 19 August, 2017, 7:47 PM

> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel 
> on Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:44:06 + writes:

> Examples similar to
> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e9, min.n = 1)
> with smaller 'n':
> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e304, n = 1e5, min.n = 1)
> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e306, n = 1e3, min.n = 1)


Thank you.

"But" all these work now (in R-devel, rev >= 73094) as they should,
at least for me, right?

Are you mentioning the  "small n" examples so we could use them
as regression tests  (instead of the regression test I had added
to tests/reg-large.R  which needs enough GB and is slowish ) --
or are you seeing a platform where the above cases still don't
work in (new enough) R-devel ?


> A report on 'pretty' when working with integers, similar to what led to 
change of 'seq' fuzz, is 
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15137

> 
> On Tue, 15/8/17, Martin Maechler  wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
> To: "Martin Maechler" 

> @r-project.org
> Date: Tuesday, 15 August, 2017, 3:55 PM

[snip]

> I've committed now what I think has been suggested
> above ... to R-devel only :
> 
> r73094 | maechler | 2017-08-15 09:10:27 +0200 (Tue, 15. Aug 2017) | 1 
Zeile
> Geänderte Pfade:
>M doc/NEWS.Rd
>M src/appl/pretty.c
>M src/main/engine.c
>M tests/reg-large.R
>M tests/reg-tests-2.Rout.save

> pretty(x, n) fix overflow for large n suggested by Suhartu Aggano, 
R-devel, 2017-08-11

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel