[Rd] Review
Hello, Can you review my bug when you have time. https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17243 Thank you. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Author email addresses
I have 3 packages on CRAN that I developed with my govt email address. I'll be retiring in a month and that email address will no longer work at some point. I realize that I need to change the maintainer address and I've already done that with one package but my question is do I need to remove all references to my govt email address listed as author in various files and replace with my new address for the package to pass checks? I've run into problems with outdated url values before and just wondering whether the bad email address will cause a check failure. I read through CRAN repository policy and did a search but couldn't find any guidance on this. regards --jeff [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Author email addresses
The old mail addresses will not result in check errors ( but perhaps should?). Please try to keep them current. Most important: Please updates all packages' maintaoiner address early enough and submit new versions to CRAN before the old address expires. Best, Uwe Ligges On 10.04.2017 20:26, Jeff Laake - NOAA Federal wrote: I have 3 packages on CRAN that I developed with my govt email address. I'll be retiring in a month and that email address will no longer work at some point. I realize that I need to change the maintainer address and I've already done that with one package but my question is do I need to remove all references to my govt email address listed as author in various files and replace with my new address for the package to pass checks? I've run into problems with outdated url values before and just wondering whether the bad email address will cause a check failure. I read through CRAN repository policy and did a search but couldn't find any guidance on this. regards --jeff [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Bug report: POSIX regular expression doesn't match for somewhat higher values of upper bound
> Von: Martin Maechler [mailto:maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. April 2017 11:15
>
> >
> > on Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:45:30 + writes:
>
> > Dear Sirs,
> > while
>
> >> regexpr('(.{1,2})\\1', 'foo')
> > [1] 2
> > attr(,"match.length")
> > [1] 2
> > attr(,"useBytes")
> > [1] TRUE
>
> > yields the correct match, an incremented upper bound in
>
> >> regexpr('(.{1,3})\\1', 'foo')
> > [1] -1
> > attr(,"match.length")
> > [1] -1
> > attr(,"useBytes")
> > [1] TRUE
>
> > incorrectly yields no match.
>
> Hmm, yes, I would also say that this is incorrect
> (though I'm always cautious: The ?regex help page explicitly
> mentions greedy repetitions, and these can "bite you" ..)
>
> The behavior is also different from the perl=TRUE one which is
> correct (according to the above understanding).
>
> ...
Shouldn't this be submitted on R's Bugzilla then (which I as a non-member
can't)?
--
Best regards,
Dietmar Schindler
manroland web systems GmbH -- Managing Director: Alexander Wassermann
Registered Office: Augsburg -- Trade Register: AG Augsburg -- HRB-No.: 26816 --
VAT: DE281389840
Confidentiality note:
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this eMail in error, then please delete this eMail.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
