[Rd] R Segfault reported in Fedora 17
Full details, including all sorts of logs here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857655 A very quick look doesn't show anything obvious, in fact, it might be a readline bug, but readline is remarkably stable and boring these days. ~tom == Fedora Project __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] R Segfault reported in Fedora 17
On Sep 17, 2012, at 19:30 , Tom Callaway wrote: > Full details, including all sorts of logs here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857655 > > A very quick look doesn't show anything obvious, in fact, it might be a > readline bug, but readline is remarkably stable and boring these days. Very hard to find this sort of bug without reproducibility instructions. But the bug report says that it is a SIGABRT, not SIGSEGV. That's a different kettle of fish isn't it? > > ~tom > > == > Fedora Project > > __ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] R Segfault reported in Fedora 17
On 09/17/2012 01:55 PM, peter dalgaard wrote: > Very hard to find this sort of bug without reproducibility instructions. I agree, especially if the bug is in readline somewhere. > But the bug report says that it is a SIGABRT, not SIGSEGV. That's a different > kettle of fish isn't it? Yep. It sure is. Just wanted to put in on your radar in case it ends up being helpful. I don't have any real plans to try to dig deeper into it, since this is the first such report (and Fedora has automated mechanisms for reporting crashed apps). ~tom == Fedora Project __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
