Re: [Rd] package slot of generic "[" and missing env@target?

2012-06-22 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Thu, 21/6/12, Hin-Tak Leung  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Since upgraded to R 2.15, I have a problem with duplicate S4
> class name no longer works (the reason for having duplicate
> S4 class names is just software forks - they are largely
> identical but don't have an inheritence relationship, and
> will never have such). 
> 
> This is happening with "library(mypackage2)" :
> 
> Error: package slot missing from signature for generic
> ‘[’
> and classes myclass, ANY, ANY, ANY
> cannot use with duplicate class names (the package may need
> to be re-installed)
> 
> I have done "debug(methods:::.pkgMethodLabel)" and found
> that curiously, it is invoked for the two copies of the "["
> generic with signature "classes myclass, ANY, ANY, ANY",
> ones with 
> packageSlot(method@target) sets to c("mypackage2",
> "methods", "methods", "methods"), the other just c("", "",
> "",""), instead of  
> c("mypackage1", "methods", "methods", "methods").
> 
> So in the R debugger, I modified the packageSlot() directly,
> and get library(mypacakge2) to finish loading, a few times
> (once in a while R craps out with some error message about
> LANGSXP - I know it is probably a bad idea to modify data
> structures within the debugger, so that's probably
> expected).
> 
> So my next step was simply to patch R/library/methods to
> downgrade the stop() to a warning(), as well as inserting
> the missing packageSlot values there and then.
> 
> This got both packages loaded. But then, some actual use of
> "[", it gives this error instead:
> 
> Error in .methodPackageSlots(def, label, table, dupl,
> isCurrent) : 
>   trying to get slot "target" from an object of a basic
> class ("environment") with no slots
> 
> and when I downgrade this error to a warning again,
> modifying (src/main/attrib.c) I got "[" dispatched to the
> base class (as well as stack imbalance - the latter is
> expected and "asking for it"...).
> 
> Anyway, I am thinking:
> 
> - doing "debug(methods:::.pkgMethodLabel)", I see two "[" of
> signature "classes myclass, ANY, ANY, ANY", one comes with
> packageSlot with the correct stuff and one with just 4 "",
> that seems to be a bug?
> 
> - from the warning at the beginning: 
> "A specification for class “myclass” in package
> ‘mypackage1’ seems equivalent to one from package
> ‘mypackage2’ and is not turning on duplicate class
> definitions for this class"
> 
> It would appear that there is a "correct" way of turning on
> duplicate class definition, but I have not found any
> documentation to that effect.
> I see some discussion about class unions, and inheritances,
> but in this case, neither are appropriate - the two packages
> are just forks and have no union nor inheritance
> relationship; but it is desirable to load both, to check for
> differences and bugs.
> 
> - I am also curious why only "[" triggers the problem, but
> not "[<-" or another of the other duplicated methods.
> Obviously subsetting is being treated specially, as is
> mentioned a few times in R internals; but I was expecting
> subassignment to be affected also, and that does not seems
> to be the case.
> 
> 
> Anyhow, it is an extremely useful feature to be able to load
> a past version of a package simultaneously just by renaming
> the package name and namespace, to check for regression and
> change-in-behavior, i.e. newly added bugs; so I am hoping to
> get this working again.
> 
> TIA.
> 

Found a small work-around - whenever I want to switch, just do

detach("package:package1", unload=TRUE)
library(package2, quietly=TRUE)

or vice versa. A bit tedious, also documentation says detach() doesn't always 
work as planned.  (with 'echo=FALSE' in Sweave, the resulting tex doesn't even 
change at all). There are also a dozen of:

Warning in FUN(X[[1L]], ...) :
  Created a package name, ‘2012-06-22 10:58:02’, when none found

whenever detach() + library() is done. Still  would appreciate clarification of 
the missing package slot in '[' generic (and whether it is a bug) and other 
matters.

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Have download.packages consider non-CRAN repositories

2012-06-22 Thread Ingmar Schuster
Hi Uwe and List,

Thanks for your suggestions.

It's a complete repository with source Packages and the PACKAGES(.gz)
index file under "src/contrib/". As mentioned: explicitly calling

install.packages("PACKAGE_NAME",
repos="file:///Users/arbeit/Documents/clarin/Open_Science/PMR2/",
type="source");

works without any problems. But configuring the repository through
R_HOME/etc/repositories and obmitting the repos argument to
install.packages() is what I want and what doesn't work. Ideas?

> And note that is must be a complete repository, i.e. packages in subdir
> "./src/contrib". A user can use install.packages(., type="source") if
> you do not provide binaries in case they are expected by default.
>
> Uwe Ligges

I knew about the type="source" argument to install.packages() but
hoped there would be a way to permanently configure this as default
for a source-only repository.


Thanks,
Ingmar Schuster

-- 
Ingmar Schuster
Natural Language Processing Group
Department of Computer Science
University of Leipzig
Johannisgasse 26
04103 Leipzig, Germany

Tel. +49 341 9732205

http://asv.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/en/staff/Ingmar_Schuster

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] Vignettes are not being (re)built.

2012-06-22 Thread Jeff Hamann
I'm adding a couple of vignettes to an existing package. 

When I make a change to the sweave file, and run the check command, 

c:\conifers\trunk>R CMD check rconifers

I get the following message(s) in the 00check.log file:

* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... WARNING
Package vignette(s) without corresponding PDF:
   'ConifersIntroVignette.rnw'
   'rconifers.Rnw'

* checking running R code from vignettes ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette PDFs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK

When the process completes, I still don't get updated vignettes in the 
rconifers.Rcheck/rconifers/inst/doc directory. 

Why? I can't find the right switch.

> win.version()
[1] "Windows 7 x64 (build 7601) Service Pack 1"
>

> R.Version()
$platform
[1] "x86_64-pc-mingw32"

$arch
[1] "x86_64"

$os
[1] "mingw32"

$system
[1] "x86_64, mingw32"

$status
[1] ""

$major
[1] "2"

$minor
[1] "15.0"

$year
[1] "2012"

$month
[1] "03"

$day
[1] "30"

$`svn rev`
[1] "58871"

$language
[1] "R"

$version.string
[1] "R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30)"

$nickname
[1] ""

>

Respectfully,
Jeff.


Jeff Hamann, PhD
PO Box 1421
Corvallis, Oregon 97339-1421
230 SW 3rd Street Suite #310
Corvallis, Oregon 97333
541-602-5438 (c)
541-754-2457 (h)
jeff.hamann[at]forestinformatics[dot]com
jeff.d.hamann[at]gmail[dot]com
http://www.forestinformatics.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_informatics

To ensure that your email is processed, include a subject entry in your email.





[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Build fails with sysdata.rda in R dir

2012-06-22 Thread Alastair
I had the same issue.

Try:
R CMD BUILD --resave-data="best" package

This worked for me.  The issue seems to be in the reserving functions, 
but I'm not sure where.

HTH

Alastair

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Vignettes are not being (re)built.

2012-06-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley

On 22/06/2012 23:01, Jeff Hamann wrote:

I'm adding a couple of vignettes to an existing package.


Incorrectly, it seems, but you told us no details.

You can use R CMD build to get the PDFs (re-)built.  R CMD check checks 
(preferably the tarball), but re-makes nothing.




When I make a change to the sweave file, and run the check command,

c:\conifers\trunk>R CMD check rconifers

I get the following message(s) in the 00check.log file:

* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... WARNING
Package vignette(s) without corresponding PDF:
'ConifersIntroVignette.rnw'
'rconifers.Rnw'

* checking running R code from vignettes ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette PDFs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK

When the process completes, I still don't get updated vignettes in the 
rconifers.Rcheck/rconifers/inst/doc directory.

Why? I can't find the right switch.


win.version()

[1] "Windows 7 x64 (build 7601) Service Pack 1"





R.Version()

$platform
[1] "x86_64-pc-mingw32"

$arch
[1] "x86_64"

$os
[1] "mingw32"

$system
[1] "x86_64, mingw32"

$status
[1] ""

$major
[1] "2"

$minor
[1] "15.0"

$year
[1] "2012"

$month
[1] "03"

$day
[1] "30"

$`svn rev`
[1] "58871"

$language
[1] "R"

$version.string
[1] "R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30)"

$nickname
[1] ""





Respectfully,
Jeff.


Jeff Hamann, PhD
PO Box 1421
Corvallis, Oregon 97339-1421
230 SW 3rd Street Suite #310
Corvallis, Oregon 97333
541-602-5438 (c)
541-754-2457 (h)
jeff.hamann[at]forestinformatics[dot]com
jeff.d.hamann[at]gmail[dot]com
http://www.forestinformatics.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_informatics

To ensure that your email is processed, include a subject entry in your email.





[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel




--
Brian D. Ripley,  rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax:  +44 1865 272595

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel