Traceback not going all the way to the exception?
I just got an exception and the traceback wouldn't go all the way to the statement that threw the exception. I found that out by using the debugger. Contrast the traceback: http://tinyurl.com/5xglde with the debugger output (notice the arrow pointing to the last statement the traceback showed and how the execution went on beyond it): http://tinyurl.com/3fjgrl Is this a known issue or should I submit a bug report? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Traceback not going all the way to the exception?
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > You forgot to specify which version of Python on which > computer system. > It's on Python 2.6. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Traceback not going all the way to the exception?
sert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > It's on Python 2.6. > On Windows. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Plotting libraries recommendations
I'm developing a circuit simulation application and will need to plot the output of my program. The output will not be functions, just a collection of numerical values of the dependent and independent variables. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Is psyco available for python 2.6?
I used the windows installer for the latest version of psyco, which is labeled as compatible with 2.5, but it gives the following error: ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found. (check that the compiled extension 'C:\Python26\lib\site- packages\psyco\_psyco.pyd' is for the correct Python version; this is Python 2.6) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Efficient searching through objects
I have written a program that reads data and updates the records for some people. They are represented by objects, and I need to read the data from a file, look the person up and then update his record. I have implemented this by creating a list with all the people's names and another list with their objects (their data). It works but after profiling the code it turns out that half the time spent in the program is spent in the list.index() function looking up names. Isn't there a less goofy and more efficient way of doing this? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Efficient searching through objects
[email protected] wrote in news:[email protected] ups.com: > Try using a dict instead, where keys are the names and > objects the values (it turns a linear search in a quick > hash look up). . Then tell us the performance changes. > It halved the overall execution time. Thanks. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
