Re: syntax color lang source code in blogs or website

2009-01-25 Thread Tim Greer
Cliff MacGillivray wrote:

> Xah Lee wrote:
>> For those of you using emacs, here's the elisp code that allows you
>> to syntax color computer language source code in your blog or
>> website.
>> 
>> http:/
>> 
>> to comment, here:
>> http://...
> Xah,
> Very nice!
> If nothing else you seem to be a pretty clever programmer.
> Indeed, you seem to understand more theoretical aspects than
> most simple minded software developers.
> I am not sure why you live out of your car?
> Has that situation changed at all? Are you working right now?

Please don't encourage this guy.  He posts to groups purely to try and
tell everyone how smart he thinks he is (regardless of how wrong he
usually is), and argues and uses vulgar language to anyone that asks
him to stop posting in non relevent news groups.  He seems to have
selected the Python and Perl groups to regularly post to, even when his
posts rarely to never have any relation to said groups.  Please, do not
encourage his behavior.  Thanks.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Function Application is not Currying

2009-01-28 Thread Tim Greer
Russ P. wrote:

> On Jan 28, 1:32 pm, Xah Lee  wrote:
>> Function Application is not Currying
>>
>> Xah Lee, 2009-01-28
>>
>> In Jon Harrop's book Ocaml for Scientist
>> athttp://www.../chapter1.html
>>
>> It says:
>>
>> Currying
>>
>> A curried function is a function which returns a function as its
>> result.
>>
>> LOL. That is incorrect.
> 
> What does that have to do with the price of bananas in Costa Rica?

Xah Lee does this stuff in 4 or 5 groups he's decided to post random
things to.  They rarely have any relevance or substance, just his
personal thoughts.  He liked to provoke arguing and tell everyone he's
a genius in his own mind.  It's best to just filter his posts out like
most of us have already done.  I don't know what group you're seeing
his post in, but he bugs us in the Perl group all the time, cross
posting things that have nothing to do with Perl (same with his cross
posts to Python, too). :-)
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Function Application is not Currying

2009-01-30 Thread Tim Greer
Jon Harrop wrote:

> I had hoped someone else would correct you but they haven't. So...

The lack of replies aren't about anyone correcting him or not, it's that
the guy just posts anything he can to spamvertize his site and tell
everyone how brilliant he thinks he is.  It's just a method he uses to
try and feel important and also get people to his site (and for the
search engines to rank it higher).  He's a known troll and spammer in a
lot of groups due to this.  The guy rarely has anything relevant to the
groups he posts to.  Most people I know of have come to just filter out
his posts.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Why not Ruby?

2008-12-31 Thread Tim Greer
Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:

> This is not a Ruby group.
> I recommend you to go waste your time there.

That poster has a frequent habit of cross posting to multiple,
irrelevant news groups.  There's no rhyme or reason to it.  It's best
to just filter the guy's posts.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Why not Ruby?

2009-01-01 Thread Tim Greer
Richard Riley wrote:

> 
> Tim Greer  writes:
> 
>> Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
>>
>>> This is not a Ruby group.
>>> I recommend you to go waste your time there.
>>
>> That poster has a frequent habit of cross posting to multiple,
>> irrelevant news groups.  There's no rhyme or reason to it.  It's best
>> to just filter the guy's posts.
> 
> No rhyme nor reason? It's quite clear, to me, why.
> 
> How is a comparison article not relevant when he is trying to
> stimulate discussion about alternative languages for modern
> development? Most news readers feature a kill thread command if you
> are not interested in the content. Certainly less extreme or ignorant
> than killing all posts from someone who clearly has interesting things
> to say about development practises and tools.

Don't get so wound up because people in groups he cross posts this junk
to actually don't want to see it.  This poster is hardly interesting or
offering anything intelligent.  This poster has a history of posting
things that he is personally interested in arguing about, and posting
it in groups that are not about the languages he chooses to complain
about.  There is no rhyme or reason to post in the Perl news group, for
example, if you're complaining about Ruby.  This is not even close to
the first time this has happened, much like his relentless posts about
Mathematica (again, cross posted to several groups, including Perl). 
This user has a specific bias and is trolling to get a rise out of
people by picking random languages and trying to cut them down,
claiming *his* opinions (based on lack of insights, ironically) are
superior.  He does this often, and always cross posts to several groups
that are completely irrelevant to his argument.

The fact you actually buy into this nonsense, actually doesn't make
anyone else wrong or ignorant for not agreeing with him, or falling for
it.  In fact, it means exactly the opposite.  If he had something
actually interesting and/or relevant, then his rants would be more
tolerated by users of these groups.  However, since he offers none of
those aspects, this is why you see people voice their grievances.  Look
at this in its basic element, if you don't believe what people say --
this user didn't post the topic in the most revelant group (being the
ruby group), and each time he goes off on another misguided tangent,
several people prove him wrong, and it doesn't phase him or change
anything -- he just continues to cross post.  Like I said, if you think
he's interesting, fine.  However, many people don't.  Perhaps as you
learn more about programming, development and specific tools and
practices, you'll come to realize this fact as well.  In the meantime,
the irony is probably lost when you actually believe he is offering
something of substance, interest or that people whom know better are
somehow ignorant.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Why not Ruby?

2009-01-01 Thread Tim Greer
Richard Riley wrote:

> Jason Rumney  writes:
> 
>> On Jan 1, 3:12 pm, r  wrote:
>>
>>> The man lives in a world driven by common sense
>>
>> "Common" sense suggests that his views are shared among the general
>> populace. I don't see much evidence of that in the sometimes never-
>> ending threads that frequently follow his postings. But it is good to
>> start debates about making changes to the status quo, often the
>> debates will result in worthwhile changes, even if those changes are
>> not what he proposed. I just wish he would choose his venue a little
>> more carefully sometimes.
> 
> I find that with Xah's posts people argue the man and not his
> points. And they argue the man because he refuses to be brow beaten by
> those who do not like to be criticised or are too think skinned. I
> rarely find his posts controversial but always interesting. His ELisp
> tutorial is far and away better than anything else out there for the
> programmer moving to Elisp IMO. He backs up his points with reasons
> and supportive evidence and rarely with "because I'm experienced and
> thats the way it is" - something not every one takes the time to do.
> He is clearly intelligent, thoughtful and experienced if a little
> lacking in finesse at times. The world needs more Xah lees.
> 

You say he's intelligent and interesting, others see it as the opposite. 
If you want to read his rants, by all means.  However, there have been
many, many posts there this poster was proven wrong. That is when the
poster become more belligerent, off topic, and vulgar.  That is not the
actions of an intelligent person that's staying on topic or providing
anything interesting.  The only thing I find interesting, is two
anonymous posters from gmail.com rushing to his defense, especially in
light of the fact that few people share your version of this person's
talents.  I'm not trying to be mean, but the guy is what people call a
usenet troll.  By all means, be his fan, but don't encourage his cross
posting trolling as a means to provoke interesting, intelligent
debating (because he's not and it's absolutely not his intention). 
Believe what you want, though, and I'll believe what I know.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Why not Ruby?

2009-01-01 Thread Tim Greer
Richard Riley wrote:

> Tim Greer  writes:
> 
>> Richard Riley wrote:
>>
>>> 
>>> Tim Greer  writes:
>>> 
>>>> Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is not a Ruby group.
>>>>> I recommend you to go waste your time there.
>>>>
>>>> That poster has a frequent habit of cross posting to multiple,
>>>> irrelevant news groups.  There's no rhyme or reason to it.  It's
>>>> best to just filter the guy's posts.
>>> 
>>> No rhyme nor reason? It's quite clear, to me, why.
>>> 
>>> How is a comparison article not relevant when he is trying to
>>> stimulate discussion about alternative languages for modern
>>> development? Most news readers feature a kill thread command if you
>>> are not interested in the content. Certainly less extreme or
>>> ignorant than killing all posts from someone who clearly has
>>> interesting things to say about development practises and tools.
>>
>> Don't get so wound up because people in groups he cross posts this
>> junk
> 
> 
> Wound up?

Yes, I'd say that accusing people of bring ignorant and attacking them
for not sharing your view on the irrelevant cross posting and trolling
of the Xah poster, is indeed an indication that you appear to be wound
up.  Perhaps you've not seen the posts and threads he's made that I've
seen?  Perhaps I've not seen the one's you have?  Either way, the one's
I have, have all been either self serving garbage about his own
personal feelings that he attempts to covey as fact with his
overbearing arrogance, or it's simply to attack others for not sharing
his view.  I find that ironic.  He attacks others, acting belligerent,
and you attack those that simply say he's better ignored.

> I am not wound up in any shape or form.

Then convey that in your attitude when replying to others you don't know
anything about, and try and be civil and not accuse people you don't
know.

> I am suggesting the  
> opposite.

Suggesting it by doing exactly what you're saying people should not do?

> It seems you are the one a little wound up.

Nope, I responded to your attempts to provoke an issue, when you accused
myself and others of being "ignorant" for not sharing your view
regarding the Xah poster.

> So wound up in  
> fact you are taking it on yourself to tell people who they should or
> should not read.

A suggestion is not an instruction or demand.  You listed reasons why
you believed those that didn't agree with you were wrong and ignorant,
and I listed reasons in response to your claim to dispute it.


>> to actually don't want to see it.  This poster is hardly interesting
>> or
>> offering anything intelligent.  This poster has a history of posting
>> things that he is personally interested in arguing about, and posting
>> it in groups that are not about the languages he chooses to complain
>> about.  There is no rhyme or reason to post in the Perl news group,
>> for
> 
> You dont seem to think that a comparison article is relevant in the
> groups dedicated to the languages he compares too?

No.  Not when it's just his own feelings about the languages.  A lot of
people have their personal feelings about various languages, imagine
all of the pollution we'd see if everyone was as arrogant as this guy,
all posting their views as if they are the authority on the matter? 
Again, going by that deduction, what do you suppose explains his
failure to consider posting this in the ruby group itself, since that
is the primary (and actually, only) relevant group (dismissing his
personal views)?

> OK. I do.

If you do, that's fine.  However, many people in the Perl group, which
I'm seeing this thread, have voiced their issues with this poster's
relentless postings of this nature.  I did as well, in this new thread.

> You are,  
> of course, welcome to your opinion and I certainly would not tell you
> who to read or not read.

I can appreciate that, and I didn't tell you to do anything though, now
did I?

> I would suggest that not everyone woul agree 
> with you and that telling people who to killfile is not at all
> constructive.

Of course I don't expect everyone to agree with me.  The poster that
replied displayed annoyance at seeing the off topic, self serving and
trollish post that this Xah poster is known for (at least in this
group), and in response to *that*, I had suggested they don't take him
seriously, and this is "what he does" (in my experience).  There's no
reason to read more into it and start claiming people are ignorant for
not agreeing with you.  And, I

Re: Why not Ruby?

2009-01-02 Thread Tim Greer
Don Geddis wrote:

> Richard Riley  wrote on Thu, 01 Jan 2009:
>> Tim Greer  writes:
>>> That poster has a frequent habit of cross posting to multiple,
>>> irrelevant
>>> news groups.  There's no rhyme or reason to it.
>>
>> No rhyme nor reason? It's quite clear, to me, why.  How is a
>> comparison article not relevant when he is trying to stimulate
>> discussion about alternative languages for modern development?
> 
> Sometimes crossposting can be useful.  But you ought to at least be
> aware of some of the possible drawbacks, e.g. expressed here:
> http://www.nhplace.com/kent/PFAQ/cross-posting.html
> 
> In particular, the usual hope by the poster is that the content is
> relevant to the union of people in the different groups, but the
> actual experience is that it is often relevant only to the
> intersection of such people.
> 
> And, moreover, that a long cross-posted thread on controversial topics
> often winds up with people talking at cross-purposes past each other,
> because they don't share enough common values to have a useful
> conversation.
> 
> In particular, the poster that started this thread is well known for
> adding far more noise than signal to any discussion, and for showing
> no interest in the greater good of any of the communities, but only in
> his own glorification.
> 
> You labor under the delusion that there is at least good intent here,
> and the
> poster ought to receive the benefit of the doubt.  Long prior
> experience shows that this hope is misplaced.
> 
> -- Don

Thank you, Don, for outlining the issue far more eloquently than I was
able to.  Also, to be clear, I don't think anyone's upset that people
find his posts interesting, but it doesn't make it so for everyone else
(or assign them any ailment if they don't see it that way) --
especially in regard to the other groups he cross posts to (of which
one should have specifically been the ruby group, but I digress.)
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: ANN: Dao, the official 1.0 version is released

2009-03-06 Thread Tim Greer
Limin Fu wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This is to announce the first official release of Dao.
> 
> Dao is a simple yet powerful object-oriented programming language

So, you pimp your language in news groups for other languages?  I see
your off topic post in 3 language groups I frequent, that's not the way
to get interest in your language.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: ANN: Dao, the official 1.0 version is released

2009-03-06 Thread Tim Greer
Limin Fu wrote:

> To Tim Greer and others:
> 
> Some people may think this kind of announcement are off topic in a
> group for another language. This is not exactly true. This is still
> about programming, there are so many programmers out there, who knows
> if there would be somebody interested in a new language. This
> announcement does not mean to threaten any language, I don't even
> think it is somewhere close to that. So take it easy.

I don't see it as a threat at all (I'm not sure how you read that from
what I said), and I honestly don't care that much, but it seems pretty
odd to post about a completely different language in groups that have
no relation.  Imagine people posting announcements about languages,
modules, extensions, etc in other language groups as they happened,
we'd see 1/2 the group's posts containing that sort of information.

You posted in the Python, Perl and Ruby groups, and it just seemed (was)
inappropriate and not a good way to get people interested (it can be a
turn off to see what could be considered spam).  Just because it's
another language doesn't make it on topic.  There are over a hundred of
them out there, and even more derivatives and it's just not usually
appreciated (though I don't pretend to speak for anyone else, but it's
a pretty accurate observation).

I don't assume ill intent by you, but it was questionable about why.
Anyway, it's not a knock on the language, I just don't think the Perl,
Ruby or Python groups are relevant (but maybe some people will find it
interesting and be glad you did -- of course, that could be said of any
post about anything).
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Ban Xah Lee

2009-03-07 Thread Tim Greer
Xah Lee wrote:

> Of interest:

Unintesting stuff snipped.  Perhaps it's the irrelevant, off topic posts
you continue to make to groups that have nothing to do with your self
gratifying rants?  We get it, you think you're smarter than anyone else
and that's the reason for you posting and arguing with people.  That is
why people probably kill filed you (there's no "ban" feature for usenet
itself).  I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that you're not as
important as you like to think yourself.  Into the killfile you go.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Ban Xah Lee

2009-03-08 Thread Tim Greer
Steve Sobol wrote:

> 
> On 2009-03-09, Kenneth Tilton  wrote:
> 
>> Buddha taught that the universe is ineluctably a single
>> interconnected web of cause and effect, which is my haughty preamble
>> to this observation: it depends on the newsgroup.
>>
>> comp.lang.lisp is cool so here Xah participates as a normal
>> contributor.
> 
> That's great, but he trolls like crazy here
> (comp.lang.java.programmer).
> 
> 
> 

Hi hits us at comp.lang.perl.misc and comp.lang.python, too (with off
topic posts). He's just a weirdo that thinks he's incredibly important
and interesting, and just ignores people's requests for him to stop
cross posting.  In the end, I've seen worse posters than Xah Lee, but
he's in my killfile.
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Ban Xah Lee

2009-03-09 Thread Tim Greer
Christian wrote:

> Though I think you are misusing the
> Usenet. For what you do you should rather write a weblog so people
> interested in your monologues could follow them in a place where they
> are by definition on topic.

I would agree that is the issue in Xah Lee's case as well.  I don't know
that he realizes he's posting in off topic groups in what seems nothing
more than self gratification, but perhaps he's just confused and
doesn't realize that usenet is not the place to just randomly post a
thought or challenge about a topic (especially in irrelevant groups to
his ranting) and linking to his site and not usually following up to
his own posts (like a poor form of self promotion of his articles).  I
agree, I think he might just be confused and needs to consider setting
up a blog about his feelings and whatnot, and he needs to understand
that it's not appropriate to do it on usenet.  Problem is, I don't
think he's just confused altogether, but he'll probably ignore the
entire topic he started anyway and continue doing what he's doing (he
seems to think the lisc, perl, python, java and ruby groups are his
personal blog medium, so all of his thoughts and feelings are
continually posted in places they don't belong -- and he doesn't care).
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Which Lisp to Learn?

2009-03-09 Thread Tim Greer
Michael Austin wrote:

> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> Xah Lee wrote:
>>> For those of you imperative programers who kept on hearing about
>>> lisp and is tempted to learn, then, ...
>> 
>> You:
>> * consider yourself unfairly treated by various communities
>> * post a long drivel about various Lisp flavors to newsgroups
>>   that are not in any way Lisp related
>> ?
>> 
>> There seems to be a disconnect somewhere.
>> 
>> Arne
> 
> Hey Arne - like he even knows what LISP is... ;)

I've not paid any attention to most of his posts, but I'd sure like to
know what crazy thing this guy is taking to believe that a his personal
feelings and post about lisp has any relation to groups I see this
nonsense in.  So, I'm not shocked to learn people question his lisp
skills anyway (he sure doesn't seem to know much about Perl or Python
and he posts a lisp post to these groups?  Sounds like he indeed
doesn't know what LISP is).
-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Ban Xah Lee

2009-03-09 Thread Tim Greer
Xah Lee wrote:

> Christian  wrote:
> 
> On Mar 9, 1:22 pm, Christian  wrote:
>> XahLeeschrieb:> Of interest:
>>
>> > • Why Can't You Be Normal?
>> >  http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
>>
>> IMHO the point that you never reply to responds is what makes it
>> problematic.
>> I have  seen 10 or more threads started by you and in not a single
>> one of those I have seen any sort of second post by you.
>>
>> Also the other thing that makes you appear like a troll is that  the
>> only posts where you are visible on the usenet are your own!
>>
>> Usenet is there for discussion. What you do seems to be mostly doing
>> a
>> often highly intelligent monologue  and awaiting comment on it.
>>
>> Its not the purpose of Usenet. Simply calling you a troll is wrong.
>> You are after all better than that. Though I think you are misusing
>> the Usenet. For what you do you should rather write a weblog so
>> people interested in your monologues could follow them in a place
>> where they are by definition on topic.
>>
>> Christian
> 
> In the article you quoted:
>  http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/ugh

Apparently my usenet filter is broken.

> contains this passage:
> 
> «
...
> »
> 
> if you didn't start your message with “IMHO”, which indicated to me
> that at least you are sincere, i would not have replied. (no offense
> intended)  Btw, i'm not some kind of saint. You (guys) do whatever
> chatty style you want, i write or choose to reply in my abstruse &
> ascetic manners. Just don't accuse when my style is not compatible
> your drivels. (insult intentional)

Actually, people take issue with you posting to groups that hold no
relevance to your posts, especially when you post about your personal
issues and problems that don't relate to any single group.

> I have written quite a lot on netiquette issues in the past decade.

But you don't follow them?

> You can find many answers about my reasons or posting behavior here:
> 
> • Netiquette Anthropology
>   http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/troll.html

I don't care for your reasons or behavior, but that you've been
repeatedly asked not to post your feelings about LISP in the Python,
Perl, and Ruby groups.

> Recently i started a blog that is collection of my online posts.

So, use that instead of posting to random, off topic groups on usenet.

> If 
> you need to talk about me, feel free to comment there.

You post here, I reply to you here.

> I am more 
> likely to reply there for questions pertaining just me. The url is
> here:

Irrevant to your posting here without relevance.  I have no desire to
talk to you and say anything else.  So, can you stop cross posting to
the same 5 groups every time you post something, unless it's actually
relevant to the group?
 
> 
> If anyone likes me to give answers particular to this thread, or
> desire me to reply to all the messages directed to me in this thread,
> i'll be more than happy to do so.

Just please stop posting to groups that hold no relevance, as if they
are your personal blog.  Usenet is not a blog.

> Also, thanks to many supporters over the past years.

I'm sure.
 
> Truly Your Superior,

I'd think anyone superior to me would understand how to use usenet
properly.

I'm being genuine and sincere, when I say that I'd like to ask that you
stop cross posting to irrelevant groups.  Thanks for your
consideration.

-- 
Tim Greer, CEO/Founder/CTO, BurlyHost.com, Inc.
Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Dedicated & Semi-Dedicated servers
and Custom Hosting.  24/7 support, 30 day guarantee, secure servers.
Industry's most experienced staff! -- Web Hosting With Muscle!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list