[Python-Dev] Python 3.0a documentation

2007-09-26 Thread scav
I'd like to help out cleaning up the Python3.0 documentation.  There are a
lot of little leftovers from 2.x that are no longer true. (mentions of
long, callable() etc.)

Ideally (especially in the tutorial), we should only refer to 3.0 features
and syntax, and keep the special cases and "other ways to do it" to a
minimum.

Before I dive in and start submitting patches, what does everyone else
think?  How much reference to previous python versions should be left in? 
Does it make sense to keep notes of the nature of "since version 2.3 ..."
when there is an intentional discontinuity at 3.0?

Peter Harris



___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Partial function application 'from the right'

2009-01-30 Thread scav
Hi all,

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Ben North  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I find 'functools.partial' useful, but occasionally I'm unable to use it
>> because it lacks a 'from the right' version.
>

-1

For me, the main objection to a partial that places
its stored positional arguments from the right is
that you don't know which positions those arguments
will actually occupy until the partial is called.

Who *really* thinks that would be a neat feature? There's probably a
reason why Haskell doesn't do
this...

Peter Harris


___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com