Re: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?

2009-11-13 Thread Wolodja Wentland 
ries it would be wise to learn from the
solutions people came up with until now (aptitude, yum, pkg_add, emerge,
...)

kind regards

Wolodja Wentland
-- 
  .''`. Wolodja Wentland 
 : :'  :
 `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC 
   `-   081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?

2009-11-14 Thread Wolodja Wentland 
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 09:43 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > What I really like on PyPi is that my packages are tested automatically
> > with Cheesecake and the order of packages when searching is determined
> > by this rating.

> That is an (apparently widespread) myth. The Cheesecake rating is not
> considered in ranking search results; it's just the relevance of the
> search term that is.

Thanks for clarifying this!

What about the other points?

Crossposted to catalog-sig to move the discussion there.
-- 
  .''`. Wolodja Wentland 
 : :'  :
 `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC 
   `-   081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com