Re: [Python-Dev] RELEASED Python 3.1 alpha 1
Benjamin Peterson wrote: On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm happy to announce the first alpha release of Python 3.1. [...] Looks good, thanks to all involved. Two minor things: For more information and downloads, see the Python 3.1 website: http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.1/ On the release page, the bzip link says '3.0' not '3.1'. See PEP 375 for release schedule details: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0361/ On the PEP page, the Google calendar link is borken. Regards G. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PyCon Keynote
Guido van Rossum wrote: Please mail me topics you'd like to hear me talk about in my keynote at PyCon this year. You might like to comment on the rumored links between the Chinese Government and the Python Softwamnnn.. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] wiki/docs enhancement idea
I didn't know who to reply to in the previous thread. (Moving the Developer docs/ Python wiki). scraperwiki.org is a 'site scraper automater'. I threw together a script just now which scrapes certain specified pages from the python wiki and converts to something rest-like. It runs every 24hrs and the idea would be that the result could be included alongside the official docs. This may increase people's motivation to contribute to the wiki. Script here: http://scraperwiki.com/scrapers/pywiki2rest/edit/ Example api call: http://api.scraperwiki.com/api/1.0/datastore/getdata?format=json&name=pywiki2rest Regards ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest`module (updated 2008-07-15)
Ben Finney wrote: Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: One option for rationalising the API would be to merely keep the shortest version of each phrase (i.e. use assert* instead of fail_unless* for the positive tests and fail_if* instead of assert_not* for the negative tests, and always drop the trailing 's' from 'equals'). I think clarity, consistency, and discoverability are more important criteria than saving a few characters in a method name. Adding in possible positive and negative forms of the proposed new methods A major point of this PEP is to *remove* redundant names in the API. def it_is_a_truth_universally_recognised_that(...): def we_are_all_feckin_doomed_unless(...): should be quite sufficient ;-) entia-non-sunt-multiplicanda-ly y'rs G. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com