[Python-Dev] Issue 22619 at bugs.python.org
Greetings. I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message yesterday, but no one seemed to be bothered. In any case, I'll respect your decision about this patch and will never ask for a review of this patch again. Regards, Dmitry. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Discussion about the proposed ignore_modules argument for traceback functions
Hello! I'd like to draw some attention to the feature(s) proposed in the issue 31299. https://bugs.python.org/issue31299 It's a dependency of the other issue, it still needs discussion, and it hasn't received any comments from committers since last September. Personally, I think that a general traceback cleaning facility proposed by Antoine should be accompanied by a similar non-destructive feature in a traceback module. If it's decided that the latter makes sense implementing, I'm willing to revive (and update) the PR I've closed earlier in time for the approaching Python 3.7 feature code cutoff. Cheers ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
