Re: [Python-Dev] 3.2.1 encoding surprise

[Anthony Kong]

Similar outcome as Paul's.

$ python3 t32enc.py
$ python t32enc.py
  File "t32enc.py", line 1
SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xc3' in file t32enc.py on line 1, but no
encoding declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.html for details
$ python3 -V
Python 3.2.1a0
$ python -V
Python 2.6.1

Running the script on OSX 10.6.8

(And I just realised I am running 3.2.1a0...)

Cheers

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Paul Moore  wrote:

> 2011/7/18 Glenn Linderman :
> > Attached reduced test case works fine with Python 3.1, fails with
> Python3.2:
>
> PS D:\Data> py -3 .\t32enc.py
> PS D:\Data> py -2 .\t32enc.py
>  File ".\t32enc.py", line 1
> SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xc3' in file .\t32enc.py on line 1,
> but no encoding declared; see http://www.python.o
> rg/peps/pep-0263.html for details
> PS D:\Data> py -3 --version
> Python 3.2.1
> PS D:\Data> py -2 --version
> Python 2.7
>
> Windows 7 32-bit, py is Vinay's implementation of the PEP 397 launcher
> for Windows.
>
> This looks like correct output to me.
>
> Could it be your environment somehow?
> Paul.
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anthony.hw.kong%40gmail.com
>



-- 

Tony Kong
*blog:* www.ahwkong.com

Don’t EVER make the mistake that you can design something better than what
you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a feedback
cycle. That’s giving your intelligence *much* too much credit.


- Linus Torvalds
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] devguide: Backporting is obsolete. Add details that I had to learn.

[Anthony Kong]

I don't find 'major' and 'minor' confusing too. Maybe because it is the
designation used in linux community for years.



On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Rob Cliffe wrote:

> But "minor version" and "major version" are readily understandable to the
> general reader, e.g. me, whereas "feature release" and "release series" I
> find are not.  Couldn't the first two terms be defined once and then used
> throughout?
> Rob Cliffe
>
>
> On 10/01/2012 04:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> On 1/9/2012 8:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Antoine Pitrou
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Please avoid using the terms "minor version" and "major version", they
 are confusing.

>>>
>>> Indeed. "Feature release" (2.7, 3.2, 3.3) and "release series" (2.x,
>>> 3.x) are the least confusing terms we have available.
>>>
>>
>> I minimally edited what was already there to correct what is now an
>> error. The change comes immediately after a section defining major, minor,
>> and micro releases. To change terms,
>> http://docs.python.org/**devguide/devcycle.html
>> and possibly other pages needs more extensive editing.
>>
>>  __**_
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/**mailman/options/python-dev/**
> anthony.hw.kong%40gmail.com
>
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com