[Python-Dev] Re: [Steering-council] Re: Steering Council reply regarding conduct (was Re: Steering Council update for February)
Martin, The decision regarding the action and email was unanimous (5-0). It was discussed in our March 15 and March 22 Steering Council meeting. This post and this other post ( https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/J5GR6YVIVWQ2VPLISAGBQH3UQN4YWAXS/) provides context on our discussion and actions. Regards, Carol On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 1:58 PM Martin Dengler wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:02:38PM -0700, Python Steering Council wrote: > >From Thomas Wouters, on behalf of and with full support of the Python > Steering > >Council: > > [use of SC power; specifically, PEP-0013.Powers.2: 'Enforce ... code of > conduct'] > > From PEP 13[^1] > >>> To use its powers, the council votes. > [...] > >>> Whenever possible, the council's deliberations and votes shall be held > in public. > > Please share the deliberations and votes. > > Martin > > [^1]: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0013.rst > ___ > Steering-council mailing list -- steering-coun...@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to steering-council-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/steering-council.python.org/ > Member address: willi...@gmail.com > ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/RXRQJJG2KOWN7SQQ6DQH6GW4OMH4TDD2/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ?
Hi all, What about of using modern C++ in developing CPython ? With C++ we can get the following benefits: 1) Readability - less code, most code is hidden by abstraction without losing performance 2) Maintainability - no code duplication in favor of using reusable classes 3) RAII - Resource Acquisition Is Initialization, predictable allocation and free resources ... ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/SMF4B2SOY6YG5BJCPEUNJVPNESA3MQOW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ?
How does C++ fare in binary compatibility? Last time I checked it out (about 10 years ago), there was completely none, every compiler's ABI was a black box without any guarantees whatsoever. For any software that's going to dynamically link and exchange binary types with other independently produced software, that's a deal breaker. On 24.03.2021 12:54, redrad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, What about of using modern C++ in developing CPython ? With C++ we can get the following benefits: 1) Readability - less code, most code is hidden by abstraction without losing performance 2) Maintainability - no code duplication in favor of using reusable classes 3) RAII - Resource Acquisition Is Initialization, predictable allocation and free resources ... ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/SMF4B2SOY6YG5BJCPEUNJVPNESA3MQOW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -- Regards, Ivan ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/DRMTE4LZYHDGZXEAAUSD532TZPJKSTAV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: How about using modern C++ in development of CPython ?
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:45:49 +0300 Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > How does C++ fare in binary compatibility? Last time I checked it out (about > 10 years ago), there was completely none, every compiler's ABI > was a black box without any guarantees whatsoever. > For any software that's going to dynamically link and exchange binary types > with other independently produced software, that's a deal breaker. That depends if you use C++ internally or expose C++ bits in the public API. If you only use C++ internally, binary compatibility is presumably less of an issue. Regards Antoine. ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/GHYWBZY56CTPBOOQRVXCOXTO2EUHUZ3Z/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
