[Python-Dev] importante!!

2015-03-31 Thread Alan Armour
its french! lol

I just wanted to see if you could, as well as making python able to have
assembly written, you should totally use blender as your main IDE it would
be so epic

and do pyjackd, and i think pyaudio will write some stuff, and like
pycoreaudio and like directpy for windows direct x

oh having blender as the main ide would just be epic
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] importante!!

2015-03-31 Thread Mark Young
Features of blender are relevant on blender mailing lists, not here . (I
don't understand why you would want a 3d modeling program to be an IDE, but
whatever floats your boat) Also, python-dev isn't really the place for
feature requests. If you want something added, add it yourself. : )
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] importante!!

2015-03-31 Thread Ryan Gonzalez


I think this was meant for python-list.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Alan Armour  wrote:

> its french! lol
>
> I just wanted to see if you could, as well as making python able to have
> assembly written, you should totally use blender as your main IDE it would
> be so epic
>
> and do pyjackd, and i think pyaudio will write some stuff, and like
> pycoreaudio and like directpy for windows direct x
>
> oh having blender as the main ide would just be epic
>
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Ryan
[ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your
program. Something’s wrong.
http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] http.client: Determining Content-Length

2015-03-31 Thread Demian Brecht
Hi all,

I'm not sure whether this should be python-list or here, but given it's a 
premature code review for http.client, I figured I'd post here first.

I'm in the process of adding support for chunked transfer encoding to 
http.client (issue #12319). One of the bits of functionality that I'm working 
on in is ironing out some of the kinks out in determining the content length of 
the request bodies. Given the number of data types allowed as bodies it does 
get a little messy, so I wanted to get some feedback here and see if anyone can 
shoot holes through it prior to updating the current patch. The tests are 
passing, but there may be use cases not accounted for in the new implementation.

https://gist.github.com/demianbrecht/f94be5a51e32bb9c81e1

The above is intended to replace _set_content_length (current state of the 
patch can be seen here: 
http://bugs.python.org/review/12319/diff/14331/Lib/http/client.py). There is a 
comprehensive list of data types currently supported can be found here: 
http://bugs.python.org/issue23740. Comments and feedback are much appreciated.

Thanks,
Demian


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] OpenBSD buildbot has many failures

2015-03-31 Thread Davin Potts
Hi Victor —

I am personally interested in seeing all tests pass on OpenBSD and am willing 
to put forth effort to help that be so.  I would be happy to be added to any 
issues that get opened against OpenBSD.  That said, I have concerns about the 
nature of when and how these failures came about — specifically I worry that 
other devs have committed the changes which prompted these failures yet they 
did not pay attention nor take responsibility when it happened.  Having 
monitored certain buildbots for a while to see how the community behaves and 
devs fail to react when a failure is triggered by a commit, I think we should 
do much better in taking individual responsibility for prompting these failures.


Davin


> On Mar 28, 2015, at 04:53, Victor Stinner  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The OpenBSD buildbot always fail with the same failures since many
> months (ex: test_socket). Is someone interested to fix them? If no,
> would it be possible to turn it off to get a better view of
> regressions? Currently, they are too many red buildbots to quickly see
> regressions introduced by recent commits.
> 
> http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20OpenBSD%205.5%203.x
> 
> Victor
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python%2Bpython_dev%40discontinuity.net

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] OpenBSD buildbot has many failures

2015-03-31 Thread Hasan Diwan
I, too, would be interested in having tests pass on OpenBSD (and NetBSD)
and am willing to do whatever I have to to make it be so. -- H

On 31 March 2015 at 21:52, Davin Potts  wrote:

> Hi Victor —
>
> I am personally interested in seeing all tests pass on OpenBSD and am
> willing to put forth effort to help that be so.  I would be happy to be
> added to any issues that get opened against OpenBSD.  That said, I have
> concerns about the nature of when and how these failures came about —
> specifically I worry that other devs have committed the changes which
> prompted these failures yet they did not pay attention nor take
> responsibility when it happened.  Having monitored certain buildbots for a
> while to see how the community behaves and devs fail to react when a
> failure is triggered by a commit, I think we should do much better in
> taking individual responsibility for prompting these failures.
>
>
> Davin
>
>
> > On Mar 28, 2015, at 04:53, Victor Stinner 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The OpenBSD buildbot always fail with the same failures since many
> > months (ex: test_socket). Is someone interested to fix them? If no,
> > would it be possible to turn it off to get a better view of
> > regressions? Currently, they are too many red buildbots to quickly see
> > regressions introduced by recent commits.
> >
> > http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20OpenBSD%205.5%203.x
> >
> > Victor
> > ___
> > Python-Dev mailing list
> > Python-Dev@python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> > Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python%2Bpython_dev%40discontinuity.net
>
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/hasan.diwan%40gmail.com
>



-- 
OpenPGP: https://hasan.d8u.us/gpg.key
Sent from my mobile device
Envoyé de mon portable
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com