Re: [Python-Dev] Request for dev permissions
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > Hello, > > would anybody mind if I was given permissions on the tracker and CVS, for > fixing small > things like bug #1202475. I feel that I can help you others out a bit with > this and > I promise I won't change the interpreter to accept braces... > Since no direct follow-up seems to have been given publicly, I wanted to double-check to see if any movement had been made on this. I personally don't know Reinhold and thus cannot vouch for him, but I wanted to make sure he got a straight yes/no answer out of someone instead of languishing in silence. -Brett ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] PEP 342/343 status?
Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still not up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh, Nick? =) Guido, you need something hashed out from us at this point, or do you have this all settled in your head and are just waiting for time to lock it down in the PEP? Or should the PEPs be changed from draft to final and an implementation (which I am *not* volunteering for =) is now needed? -Brett ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 342/343 status?
Brett C. wrote: > Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to > see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still not > up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh, > Nick? =) Something like that. . . still, I finally got around to fixing the formatting in the text file and sending it back to David :) > Guido, you need something hashed out from us at this point, or do you have > this > all settled in your head and are just waiting for time to lock it down in the > PEP? Or should the PEPs be changed from draft to final and an implementation > (which I am *not* volunteering for =) is now needed? There's a generator finalisation PEP to come from Raymond, and Guido has made some comments on that front that probably need to be folded into PEP 343. And implementations will probably have to wait for the AST branch anyway. . . Off-to-fix-the-generator-symbol-table-entries'ly, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --- http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
