[issue1686386] Python SEGFAULT on invalid superclass access
toxik added the comment: Minor note: The patch mixes tabs and spaces. AFAIK, PEP 7 says to use four spaces when making new code, and follow suite in legacy, or convert it. _ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1686386> _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1686386] Python SEGFAULT on invalid superclass access
toxik added the comment: Hm, may be so. Feel free to change title/severity if you'd like to. _ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1686386> _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3276] httplib.HTTPConnection._send_request should not blindly assume dicts for headers
New submission from toxik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Presently it's impossible to use httplib.HTTPConnection.request and send the several headers with the same name. This is because _send_request assumes a dict is passed in, or a dict-like interface. Obviously one could make a list subclass or some such and give it an iteritems that returns itself, but IMHO the solution is to fix httplib. Attached patch changes the current behavior to using iteritems only if it exists, otherwise iterate directly (which would fit with sequences of two- tuples). -- components: Library (Lib) files: httplib.py.diff keywords: patch messages: 69234 nosy: ludvig.ericson severity: normal status: open title: httplib.HTTPConnection._send_request should not blindly assume dicts for headers versions: Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10807/httplib.py.diff ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3276> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1696] Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts
New submission from toxik: It's actually py251. 113 else: 114 f.close() 115 self.copy_file(script, outfile) Earlier, f is set to None if file is not found, and we are in dry-run mode. Simple solution: 113 elif f: 114 f.close() 115 self.copy_file(script, outfile) -- components: Distutils messages: 58988 nosy: ludvig.ericson severity: normal status: open title: Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts type: crash versions: Python 2.5 __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1696> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1696] Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts
toxik added the comment: It doesn't die now, but AFAICT, it doesn't even try to copy the script now. (With your patch.) I might also add that this is for package_data. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1696> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1696] Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts
toxik added the comment: It shouldn't try to copy the script anywhere, it should just tell me what it was going to do, by means of console. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1696> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1696] Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts
toxik added the comment: Mmh, well, as far as I could tell when I tested your patch, it didn't say it's going to copy the file, but it didn't say it isn't going to either. As far as this ticket is concerned however, I'd say the behavior is now fixed. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1696> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5814] SocketServer: TypeError: waitpid() takes no keyword arguments
toxik added the comment: I don't really get how this could've ever worked. I tested using keyword arguments in py24 and py25, didn't work there either. I think the best approach would be fixing the SocketServer.py code (which obviously needs a test as well, because it's never run.) -- nosy: +ludvig.ericson ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue5814> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
