[issue37863] Speed up hash(fractions.Fraction)
Change by ppperry : -- title: Speed hash(fractions.Fraction) -> Speed up hash(fractions.Fraction) ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue37863> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38084] multiprocessing cannot recover from crashed worker
ppperry added the comment: Is this not a duplicate of issue22393? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38084> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38229] ClientConnectionError exception doesn't serialize propertly
ppperry added the comment: This seems more likely to be a bug in aiohttp than in python. -- nosy: +ppperry type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38229> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38262] Mixins - super calls in bases of multiple-inheritance with different parameters
Change by ppperry : -- type: compile error -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38262> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11105] Compiling recursive Python ASTs crash the interpreter
Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue11105> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue36220] LOAD_NAME and LOAD_GLOBAL, STORE_GLOBAL handle dict subclasses for globals() differently
ppperry added the comment: Duplicate of issue32615 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36220> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11105] Compiling evil ast crashes interpreter
ppperry added the comment: What about indirect cycles like below: >>> e = ast.UnaryOp(op=ast.Not(), lineno=0, col_offset=0) >>> f = ast.UnaryOp(op=ast.Not(), lineno=0, col_offset=0) >>> e.operand = f >>> f.operand = e >>> compile(ast.Expression(e), "", "eval") (I tested, this also crashes) -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue11105> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue39344] ImportError: DLL load failed while importing _ssl: The specified module could not be found."
Change by ppperry : -- title: Getting error while importing ssl " import _ssl # if we can't import it, let the error propagate ImportError: DLL load failed while importing _ssl: The specified module could not be found." -> ImportError: DLL load failed while importing _ssl: The specified module could not be found." ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39344> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass
ppperry added the comment: I was not attempting to run untrusted Python code when I filed this bug report. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32615> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue39585] Delete a pending item in _warning.c
ppperry added the comment: What if a warning has a metaclass with a custom __getattribute__ method? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39585> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue39665] Cryptic error message when creating types that don't include themselves in their MRO
New submission from ppperry : I was trying to create a class that didn't have any references to itself to test issue39382 and ran the following code: class Meta(type): def mro(cls): return type.mro(cls)[1:] class X(metaclass=Meta): pass This produced an extremely cryptic error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in class X(metaclass=Meta): TypeError: super(type, obj): obj must be an instance or subtype of type While what I am trying to do may well not be supported, the error message referencing the `super` function, which I didn't use, is not helpful. -- components: Build, Interpreter Core messages: 362152 nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Cryptic error message when creating types that don't include themselves in their MRO type: behavior versions: Python 3.7, Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39665> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue39382] abstract_issubclass() doesn't take bases tuple item ref
ppperry added the comment: I posted a test on the PR -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39382> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue39665] Cryptic error message when creating types that don't include themselves in their MRO
Change by ppperry : -- components: -Build versions: +Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39665> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue40241] [C API] Make PyGC_Head structure opaque, or even move it to the internal C API
Change by ppperry : -- title: [C API] Make PyGC_Head structure opaque, or even more it to the internal C API -> [C API] Make PyGC_Head structure opaque, or even move it to the internal C API ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue40241> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue33065] IDLE debugger: failure stepping through module loading
Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33065> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42849] pool worker can't be terminated
ppperry added the comment: duplicate of issue22393? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42849> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30953] Fatal python error when jumping into except clause
Change by ppperry : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue30953> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError
ppperry added the comment: Indeed, you are right that this should be reopened. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35753> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError
Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35753> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue37830] continue in finally with return in try results with segfault
ppperry added the comment: Unfortunately, there's a similar bug for `break` in a finally inside two nested loops, so just re-banning `continue` won't fix the crash. The code below segfaults: ``` def simple(): for number in range(2): for number in range(2): try: return number finally: break simple() ``` -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue37830> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13220] print function unable while multiprocessing.Process is being run
ppperry added the comment: Duplicate of issue11820. -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13220> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from imp.create_builtin
New submission from ppperry:
The following rather long code, reduced from the same example as issue30626,
produces a SystemError:
import builtins
from importlib.machinery import PathFinder
import importlib
import sys
import _imp
from functools import partial
def copy_module(module):
new = type(sys)(module.__name__)
new.__dict__.update(module.__dict__)
return new
_absent = object()
def new_exec(code, globals=_absent, locals=_absent, *, new_builtins):
if globals == _absent:
frame = sys._getframe(2)
globals = frame.f_globals
locals = frame.f_locals
elif locals == _absent:
locals = globals
globals.setdefault("__builtins__", new_builtins);
return exec(code, globals, locals)
dct={}
dct["__builtins__"] = b = copy_module(builtins)
b.exec = partial(new_exec, new_builtins=b)
spec = PathFinder.find_spec("_bootstrap",importlib.__path__)
source_bootstrap = type(sys)("_bootstrap");
spec.loader.exec_module(source_bootstrap);
external_spec = PathFinder.find_spec("_bootstrap_external",importlib.__path__)
source_bootstrap_external = type(sys)("_bootstrap_external");
external_spec.loader.exec_module(source_bootstrap_external);
source_bootstrap.__name__ = "importlib._bootstrap";
source_bootstrap_external.__name__ = "importlib._bootstrap_external";
new_sys = copy_module(sys)
new_sys.path_importer_cache = {}
new_sys.path_hooks = []
new_sys.meta_path = []
new_sys.modules = {
"importlib._bootstrap":source_bootstrap,
"importlib._bootstrap_external":source_bootstrap_external,
}
for mod in new_sys.modules.values():
mod.__builtins__ = b
b.__import__ = source_bootstrap.__import__
source_bootstrap._install(new_sys,_imp)
exec("import _pickle", dct)
------
components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib)
messages: 297924
nosy: brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan, ppperry
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: `SystemError: returned NULL without
setting an error` from imp.create_builtin
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30873>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle
Changes by ppperry : -- title: `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from imp.create_builtin -> `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30873> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle
ppperry added the comment: Interesting. For you, `_pickle` seems to be an extension module, which is thus trying to call `imp.create_dynamic`, whereas for me it is a builtin module. Perhaps that explains why you get a KeyError and I get a SystemError (my traceback ends with): File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\importlib\_bootstrap.py", line 560, in module_from_spec module = spec.loader.create_module(spec) File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\importlib\_bootstrap.py", line 725, in create_module return _call_with_frames_removed(_imp.create_builtin, spec) File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\importlib\_bootstrap.py", line 205, in _call_with_frames_removed return f(*args, **kwds) SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error (and is the same as your 3.6 traceback up to that point) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30873> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle on Windows
Changes by ppperry : -- title: `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle -> `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle on Windows ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30873> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30876] SystemError on importing module that deletes itself from sys.modules
Changes by ppperry : -- title: SystemError on import -> SystemError on importing module that deletes itself from sys.modules ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30876> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30949] Provide assertion functions in unittest.mock
ppperry added the comment: You can already do this, although it it somewhat of a hack: >>> assert_called_once=Mock.assert_called_once # This will be an AttributeError >>> assert_called_once_with=Mock.assert_called_once_with >>> example = Mock() >>> assert_caled_once_with(example, ...) # A NameError >>> assert_called_once_with(example, ...) # Great success! -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30949> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30953] Fatal python error when jumping into except clause
New submission from ppperry: trying to execute the following code: import sys def trace(frame, event, arg): if event == "line" and frame.f_lineno > 12: frame.f_lineno = 12 return None return trace sys.settrace(trace) def error(): try: pass except: pass pass pass error() Produces a fatal error: Fatal Python error: XXX block stack underflow Current thread 0x0af4 (most recent call first): File "jumpintoexception.py", line 12 in error File "jumpintoexception.py", line 15 in -- components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib) messages: 298556 nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Fatal python error when jumping into except clause type: crash versions: Python 3.7 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30953> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30958] Scripts folder is empty
Changes by ppperry : -- type: performance -> behavior ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30958> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30990] Calls to C functions using `.__call__` don't get sent to profiler.
New submission from ppperry: If you create a file called `inputtest.py` with the contents `input.__call__()`, and run the built-in profile module on it, it doesn't notice the call to `input`, and produces a report not including that call. 4 function calls in 0.000 seconds Ordered by: standard name ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function) 10.0000.0000.0000.000 :0(exec) 10.0000.0000.0000.000 :0(setprofile) 10.0000.0000.0000.000 inputtest.py:1() 10.0000.0000.0000.000 profile:0( at 0x029880C0, file "inputtest.py", line 1>) 00.000 0.000 profile:0(profiler) -- components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib) messages: 298847 nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Calls to C functions using `.__call__` don't get sent to profiler. type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.7 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30990> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34782] Pdb crashes when code is executed in a mapping that does not define `__contains__`
ppperry added the comment:
The thing is, though, that the same error occurs if a larger code being
debugged calls `exec` or `eval` with such a mapping
(`pdb.run("eval('1+1',{},FakeContainer())" also crashes with the same error),
and the test suite contains code that evals other code in an incomplete mapping
(test_var_annot_custom_maps in test_grammar)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34782>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError
ppperry added the comment: According to the error message, this is a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue25532 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35753> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError
ppperry added the comment: Sorry, looks like I was wrong about it being a duplicate. The actual bug appears to be "doctest can't run on a module that contains un-unwrappable objects", which there probably is an issue for but I don't know what it is. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35753> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34782] Pdb crashes when code is executed in a mapping that does not define `__contains__`
ppperry added the comment: You have to step into the eval for the error to be raised. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34782> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment: Does this work with wacky code like this? @functools.total_ordering class ClassAssignmentCanBreakChecks(): def __init__(self, i): self._i = i def __lt__ (self, other): last.__class__ = OrdinaryOldInteger return self._i < (other._i if hasattr(other, '_i') else other) @functools.total_ordering class OrdinaryOldInteger: def __init__(self, i): self._i = i def __lt__(self, other): return self._i < (other._i if hasattr(other, '_i') else other) lst = [ClassAssignmentCanBreakChecks(i) for i in range(10)] random.shuffle(lst) last = lst[-1] lst.sort() It looks like it will initially say that all are the same type, and attempt that optimization, which will probably lead to unexpected results as that condition is no longer true after the first compare. -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue28685> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment: > > Elliot Gorokhovsky added the comment: > > Your code changes __class__, not type, which would remain equal to > "instance". (my understanding, could be wrong). The docs say the > following: > Nope: class A:pass class B:pass a = A() a.__class__ = B type(a) returns "" -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue28685> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment:
And what about even wackier code like this?
class A(int):
def __lt__(self, other):
print("zebra")
A.__lt__ = A.__false_lt__
return int.__lt__(self, other)
__true_lt__ = __lt__
def __false_lt__(self, other):
print("gizmo")
A.__lt__ = A.__true_lt__
return int.__lt__(self, other)
[A(i) for i in range(20, 5, -1)].sort()
This alternates printing "zebra" and "gizmo" for every comparison, and there is
no way to add some sort of caching without changing this behavior.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue28685>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment: What about if one of the relevant comparison functions is implemented in C? class WackyComparator(int): def __lt__(self, other): elem.__class__ = WackyList2 return int.__lt__(self, other) class WackyList1(list):pass class WackyList2(list): def __lt__(self, other): raise ValueError lst = list(map(WackyList1,[[WackyComparator(3),5],[WackyComparator(4),6],[WackyComparator(7),7]])) random.shuffle(lst) elem = lst[-1] lst.sort() This code raises ValueError, and caching seems like it would cache the comparator for WackyList1 objects, which is the same as the comparator for 'list' objects -- and midway through comparison, one of them changes type to WackyList2, which has its own (broken) comparison function. Python is very very dynamic ... -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue28685> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue29794] Incorrect error message on invalid __class__ assignments
New submission from ppperry: If you try to set the __class__ of a type which doesn't support "__class__" assignments, you get the error message: TypeError: __class__ assignment only supported for heap types or ModuleType subclasses However, the actual restriction doesn't require a subclass of "ModuleType"; the below code works: import random class M(type(random)):pass random.__class__ = M Thus the error message is incorrect. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 289448 nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Incorrect error message on invalid __class__ assignments type: behavior versions: Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29794> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment: Wouldn't the assignment of "__lt__" change the value of the tp_richcompare slot? That seems to be what the code in Objects/typeobject.c is doing with the update_slot method and the related helper functions. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue28685> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment: - Doesn't youre skipping PyObject_RichCompareBool and directly getting tp_richcompare also mean that you bypass the NotImplemented checking? Thus, wouldn't this code, which raises a TypeError currently, silently work? class PointlessComparator: def __lt__(self, other): return NotImplemented [PointlessComparator(),PointlessComparator()].sort() ... ... ... -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue28685> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19675] Pool dies with excessive workers, but does not cleanup
ppperry added the comment: Can't you just mock the Process class to have a start method that always raises an error? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue19675> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19791] test_pathlib should use can_symlink or skip_unless_symlink from test.support
Changes by ppperry : -- pull_requests: +729 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue19791> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30626] "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error
Changes by ppperry : -- nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30626> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30626] "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function
New submission from ppperry:
This code (reduced from an example I had of trying to debug code including the
module-level code of already imported modules), raises a SystemError:
import builtins
from importlib.machinery import PathFinder
from importlib.util import find_spec
import importlib
import sys
import _imp
dct={}
def copy_module(module):
new = type(sys)(module.__name__)
new.__dict__.update(module.__dict__)
return new
dct["__builtins__"] = b = copy_module(builtins)
spec = PathFinder.find_spec("_bootstrap",importlib.__path__)
source_bootstrap = type(sys)("_bootstrap");
spec.loader.exec_module(source_bootstrap);
source_bootstrap.__name__ = "importlib._bootstrap";
new_sys = copy_module(sys)
new_sys.path_hooks = []
new_sys.meta_path = []
new_sys.modules = {
"importlib._bootstrap":source_bootstrap,
"importlib._bootstrap_external":importlib._bootstrap_external,
}
b.__import__ = source_bootstrap.__import__
source_bootstrap._install(new_sys,_imp)
dct["__file__"]=__file__
exec("open(__file__)",dct)
The actual file passed to the open function doesn't matter, as long as it would
work
--
components: +IO, Interpreter Core, Library (Lib)
title: "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL
without setting an error -> "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30626>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30626] "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function
Changes by ppperry : -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan, stutzbach ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30626> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30626] "SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function
Changes by ppperry : -- title: "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function -> "SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30626> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30626] "SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function
Changes by ppperry : -- type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30626> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1402289] Allow mappings as globals (was: Fix dictionary subclass ...)
ppperry added the comment: See also issue32615 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue1402289> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass
New submission from ppperry :
Take the following code:
import builtins
class K(dict):
def __getitem__(self, k):
if k not in builtins.__dict__:
print("get %s" % k)
return dict.__getitem__(self, k)
def __setitem__(self, k, v):
print("set %s" % k)
dict.__setitem__(self, k, v)
exec("""
foo = "bar"
foo
try:
qyz
except NameError:
pass
class K:
baz = foo
def f(ggg=foo): pass
def g(ggg=foo):
global f
f = 87
f
g()
""",K())
This should consitently either call or not call the overridden methods on the
dictionary, producing either no output or:
set foo
get foo
get qyz
get foo
get foo
set K
get foo
set g
get g
set f
get f
Instead, only sometime the override gets called, producing
set foo
get foo
get qyz
set K
get foo
set g
get g
get f
meaning that
(a) modifications of global variables via global statements
(b) code at class-level
ignore overridden methods, whereas everything else follows them
------
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 310388
nosy: ppperry
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass
versions: Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32615>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass
Change by ppperry : -- type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32615> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass
ppperry added the comment: Uh, I'm not undertsanding the relevance of whether the code is run at module-level or not. It can't possibly be a feature that * some code * uses the overrides and *other code* doesn't. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32615> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32621] Problem of consistency in collection.abc documentation
Change by ppperry : -- title: Problem of consistence in collection.abc documentation -> Problem of consistency in collection.abc documentation ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32621> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17852] Built-in module _io can lose data from buffered files in reference cycles
Change by ppperry : -- title: Built-in module _io can lose data from buffered files at exit -> Built-in module _io can lose data from buffered files in reference cycles ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue17852> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14010] deeply nested itertools objects segfault
Change by ppperry : -- title: deeply nested filter segfaults -> deeply nested itertools objects segfault ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue14010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance
ppperry added the comment: ... and I'm still trying to come up with even more pathological mutating cases -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue28685> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8525] Display exceptions' subclasses in help()
Change by ppperry : -- title: Display exception's subclasses in help() -> Display exceptions' subclasses in help() ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue8525> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32895] Make general function sum() use Numpy's sum when obviously possible
Change by ppperry : -- components: +Library (Lib) -2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool) ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32895> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32895] Make general function sum() use Numpy's sum when obviously possible
Change by ppperry : -- type: enhancement -> performance ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32895> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32895] Make general function sum() use Numpy's sum when obviously possible
Change by ppperry : -- type: performance -> enhancement ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32895> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32900] Teach pdb to step through asyncio et al.
ppperry added the comment:
This feature already exists and doesn't need to be reimplemented; use
`pdb.Pdb(skip={"trio", "contextlib", ...}).run(...)`, and in any case should be
disableable. I don't use asyncio, but happen to have a habit of running pdb
through the standard library for no reason and don't want to have that option
taken away.
--
nosy: +ppperry
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32900>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32900] Teach pdb to step through asyncio et al.
ppperry added the comment: Just to be clear, I'm not opposing having the default value for `skip` be something other than the empty set, but it should be overridable, and the default should include some other things this patch omits, like `importlib._bootstrap(_external)?` -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32900> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32900] Teach pdb to step through asyncio et al.
Change by ppperry : -- versions: +Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32900> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32911] Doc strings no longer stored in body of AST
Change by ppperry : -- title: Doc strings omitted from AST -> Doc strings no longer stored in body of AST ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32911> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32926] Add public TestCase method/property to get result of current test
Change by ppperry : -- versions: +Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32926> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32926] Add public TestCase method/property to get result of current test
Change by ppperry : -- components: +Library (Lib) ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32926> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30953] Fatal python error when jumping into except clause
ppperry added the comment: ... with a bad error message, because there are no finally blocks in the code -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue30953> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue33093] Fatal error on SSL transport
Change by ppperry : -- type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33093> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue33120] infinite loop in inspect.unwrap(unittest.mock.call)
ppperry added the comment: This is a dupe of https://bugs.python.org/issue25532 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33120> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue31925] test_socket creates too many locks
Change by ppperry : -- title: test_socket creates too much locks -> test_socket creates too many locks ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue31925> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32140] IDLE debugger fails with non-trivial __new__ super call
ppperry added the comment: Simplified reproducer for same bug without any imports: class BadRepr: def __repr__(self): 1/0 def broken(): x=BadRepr() x=x #filler line for debugger In this case, the problematic BadRepr object in the "broken" function explictly has a broken __repr__, but the uninitialized Fraction object in the "__new__" function of the Fraction class has a similarly broken __repr__ -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32140> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue33460] "..." is used to confusingly indicate many different things in chapter 3
Change by ppperry : -- title: ... used to indicate many different things in chapter 3, some are confusing -> "..." is used to confusingly indicate many different things in chapter 3 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33460> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue29199] test_regrtest fails if PCBuild directory doesn't exist
ppperry added the comment: This issue seems to have been fixed in 3.7 -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue29199> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue29199] test_regrtest fails if PCBuild directory doesn't exist
ppperry added the comment: To be precise, fixed as part of issue33352 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue29199> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue33120] infinite loop in inspect.unwrap(unittest.mock.call)
Change by ppperry : -- type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33120> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34127] Gramatically incorrect error message for some descriptor calls with wrong number of arguments
New submission from ppperry :
`{}.get()`
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
TypeError: get expected at least 1 arguments, got 0
Shouldn't that be "TypeError: get expected at least 1 argument, got 0" instead?
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 321752
nosy: ppperry
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Gramatically incorrect error message for some descriptor calls with
wrong number of arguments
versions: Python 3.6, Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34127>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34126] Profiling certain invalid calls crash Python
Change by ppperry : -- type: -> crash ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34126> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34128] Do not block threads when pickle/unpickle
ppperry added the comment: um, something doesn't make sense about this. the python implementation of pickle never released the GIL (it can't, by definition -- it's written in python). The C implementation releasing the GIL wouldn't make sense, as the pickle api involves calls into python everywhere (for example, `__reduce__`) -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34128> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34126] Profiling certain invalid calls crashes Python
Change by ppperry : -- title: Profiling certain invalid calls crash Python -> Profiling certain invalid calls crashes Python ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34126> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34128] Release GIL periodically in _pickle module
Change by ppperry : -- components: +Library (Lib) title: Do not block threads when pickle/unpickle -> Release GIL periodically in _pickle module ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34128> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34128] Release GIL periodically in _pickle module
Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34128> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34127] Gramatically incorrect error message for some calls with wrong number of arguments
ppperry added the comment: Another test case: >> classmethod() Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 2, in check TypeError: classmethod expected 1 arguments, got 0 -- title: Gramatically incorrect error message for some descriptor calls with wrong number of arguments -> Gramatically incorrect error message for some calls with wrong number of arguments ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34127> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21600] mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict
Change by ppperry : -- title: mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict to sys.modules -> mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue21600> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34188] Allow dict choices to "transform" values in argpagse
Change by ppperry : -- title: Use dicts to "transform" argparse arguments to values -> Allow dict choices to "transform" values in argpagse ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34188> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34193] Fix pluralization in TypeError messages in getargs.c
Change by ppperry : -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34193> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb
New submission from ppperry :
(Pdb) restart \
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 1667, in main
pdb._runscript(mainpyfile)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 1548, in _runscript
self.run(statement)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\bdb.py", line 431, in run
exec(cmd, globals, locals)
File "", line 1, in
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\bdb.py", line 48, in trace_dispatch
return self.dispatch_line(frame)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\bdb.py", line 66, in dispatch_line
self.user_line(frame)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 261, in user_line
self.interaction(frame, None)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 352, in interaction
self._cmdloop()
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 321, in _cmdloop
self.cmdloop()
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\cmd.py", line 138, in cmdloop
stop = self.onecmd(line)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 418, in onecmd
return cmd.Cmd.onecmd(self, line)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\cmd.py", line 217, in onecmd
return func(arg)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 1025, in do_run
sys.argv = shlex.split(arg)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\shlex.py", line 305, in split
return list(lex)
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\shlex.py", line 295, in __next__
token = self.get_token()
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\shlex.py", line 105, in get_token
raw = self.read_token()
File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\shlex.py", line 206, in read_token
raise ValueError("No escaped character")
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 322595
nosy: ppperry
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34266>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb
ppperry added the comment: Just to be clear, even though the traceback is python 3.6, the same bug occurs in 3.7 with an identical traceback except for some changes in line number -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34266> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" or "restart "" in pdb
ppperry added the comment: `restart "` also crashes with the same tb -- title: Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb -> Bad behavior with "restart \" or "restart "" in pdb ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34266> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" or "restart "" in pdb
ppperry added the comment: Both of those work and don't produce an error -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34266> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects
New submission from ppperry : > type(sys.flags).__new__(type(sys.flags)) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in type(sys.flags).__new__(type(sys.flags)) TypeError: tuple.__new__(sys.flags) is not safe, use sys.flags.__new__() Ignoring the confusion caused by both the type and the instance being called "sys.flags", this error doesn't make sense. I am using "sys.flags" (the type).__new__, so why is it complaining? "type(sys.flags)()" produces the standard "non-instantiable type" error. The same behavior also happens for "sys.version_info", but strangely not for any of the other sys constants. -- components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib) messages: 322688 nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects type: behavior versions: Python 3.7, Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34284> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects
ppperry added the comment: Your PR is not an improvement: 1. In this case, this will produce the error "tuple.__new__(sys.flags) is not safe". But I didn't call "tuple.__new__", I called sys.flags.__new__, and type(X).__new__(type(X)) should always be safe 2. The change in error message for namedtuples (A) isn't related and (B) isn't correct. `tuple.__new__(NamedTuple)` works, and produces a namedtuple object, so tuple.__new__ is what the error should point to. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34284> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable object
ppperry added the comment: Same thing happens for other objects, like `type(sys._getframe(0)).__new__(type(sys._getframe_))`, and presumably any object that one cannot instantiate by calling -- title: Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects -> Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable object ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34284> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable objects
ppperry added the comment:
The error I'm expecting here is "cannot create sys.flags objects". Anything
else violates the fact that type(*args) is sugar for:
result = type.__new__(type, *args)
if isinstance(result, type):
result.__init__(*args)
("type" in the above snippet is a variable name, not the actual builtin "type")
--
title: Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects
-> Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable
objects
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34284>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable objects
ppperry added the comment: Thus, I think the bug is that "type(sys.flags).__new__" is an alias for "tuple.__new__" and is not in the code for __new__ calls that your PR touches. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34284> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue29502] Should PyObject_Call() call the profiler on C functions, use C_TRACE() macro?
ppperry added the comment: issue30990 is related -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue29502> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34279] RFC: issue a warning in regrtest when no tests have been executed?
Change by ppperry : -- title: RFC: issue a warning in regrtest when no test have been executed? -> RFC: issue a warning in regrtest when no tests have been executed? ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34279> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue31710] setup.py: _ctypes won't get built when system ffi is only in $PREFIX
Change by ppperry : -- title: setup.py: _ctypes won't getbuilt when system ffi is only in $PREFIX -> setup.py: _ctypes won't get built when system ffi is only in $PREFIX ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue31710> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34327] test_subprocess fails
Change by ppperry : -- components: +Tests -Build title: CPython make test crash -> test_subprocess fails type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34327> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34331] Incorrectly pluralized abstract class error message
New submission from ppperry : >>> class abstract(abc.ABC): ... @abc.abstractmethod ... def meth(): ... pass ... >>> x() Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: Can't instantiate abstract class x with abstract methods meth Error should be "Can't instantiate abstract class abstract with abstract method meth" in the singular, because there is only one abstract method. -- components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib) messages: 323059 nosy: Anjali Bansal, ppperry, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, xtreak priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Incorrectly pluralized abstract class error message versions: Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34331> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34331] Incorrectly pluralized abstract class error message
ppperry added the comment: No, this isn't causing me an actual problem, however the related issue34127 was accepted, and this one should be no harder to fix. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34331> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
