[issue45442] Update `Virtual Environment` tutorial
New submission from Shivnaren Srinivasan : Priority: Low The Virtual Environment tutorial page (https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/venv.html) doesn't specify how we can revert, or deactivate the `venv`. This is quite a popular question on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/990754/how-to-leave-exit-deactivate-a-python-virtualenv ``deactivate`` worked for me—this could be added to the docs? Happy to submit a PR. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 403722 nosy: docs@python, shivnaren priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Update `Virtual Environment` tutorial type: enhancement versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45442> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45442] Update `Virtual Environment` tutorial
Shivnaren Srinivasan added the comment: In the same vein, the specified script for windows is the old .bat file, though PowerShell is now the preferred shell (and for which a .ps1 script is generated in the venv directory). We could make the .ps1 the default, and specify the .bat as an alternative? -- type: enhancement -> ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45442> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45442] Update `Virtual Environment` tutorial
Change by Shivnaren Srinivasan : -- pull_requests: +27268 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/28981 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45442> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45442] Update `Virtual Environment` tutorial
Change by Shivnaren Srinivasan : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45442> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45497] Argparse: Refactor '%' interpolation to f-strings
New submission from Shivnaren Srinivasan : I use `argparse` a lot, and I think it's great—going through the source code, I see all string interpolation is with the old printf `%` formatting. AFAIK, f-strings are now the suggested method for interpolation (*after they were introduced, that is*). Do we want to refactor the '%' instances to f-strings? Happy to submit a PR if so. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 404108 nosy: rhettinger, shivnaren priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Argparse: Refactor '%' interpolation to f-strings type: enhancement versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45497> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45497] Argparse: Refactor '%' interpolation to f-strings
Shivnaren Srinivasan added the comment: Understood--thank you for the responses. -- resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45497> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
