[issue12998] Memory leak with CTypes Structure

2011-09-17 Thread Sebastian Wiesner

Sebastian Wiesner  added the comment:

Why should it?  After all, you're sort of abusing ctypes by repeatedly creating 
Struture types over and over again.  C structures that you might want to wrap 
with these types are fixed and known at the time of programming, so there is 
never a need to create the same Structure type twice.  Thus the set of 
Structure subclasses created during the live-time of a program is both, fixed 
and small, so there is no need to limit the cache size.

--
nosy: +lunar

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12998>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12873] 2to3 incorrectly handles multi-line imports from __future__

2011-09-01 Thread Sebastian Wiesner

Changes by Sebastian Wiesner :


--
nosy: +lunar

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12873>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12873] 2to3 incorrectly handles multi-line imports from __future__

2011-09-02 Thread Sebastian Wiesner

Sebastian Wiesner  added the comment:

More precisely, the bug is, that 2to3 refactors the "print()" invocation in 
"test1.py" though it shouldn't because a "print_function" future import is 
present at the beginning of "test1.py".  The cross-check with "test2.py" shows 
that this is due to the multi-line future import in "test1.py" because the 
line-break in the import statement is the only difference between both files.

--

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12873>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4411] __mro__ documentation

2008-11-24 Thread Sebastian Wiesner

New submission from Sebastian Wiesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

The documentation of Python 2.6 and 2.7 only mentions the class
attribute "__mro__" in ABC documentation and in Data model documentation
when explaining description invocation (see search results:
http://docs.python.org/dev/search.html?q=__mro__&check_keywords=yes&area=default)

Imho __mro__ lacks documentation in "Standard Type Hierachy", where
special attributes of fundamental data types are documented.

--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages: 76355
nosy: georg.brandl, lunar
severity: normal
status: open
title: __mro__ documentation
versions: Python 2.7

___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4411>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com