[issue12490] Documentation for itertools.chain.from_iterable is incorrect
New submission from Rodolpho Eckhardt : The documentation at http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/itertools.html#itertools.chain and http://docs.python.org/library/itertools.html#itertools.chain is inconsistent. At the definition of the class it states that itertools.chain.from_iterable can receive one iterable "Gets chained inputs from a single iterable argument that is evaluated lazily.", but then it contradicts itself by using the following example: @classmethod def from_iterable(iterables): # chain.from_iterable(['ABC', 'DEF']) --> A B C D E F for it in iterables: for element in it: yield element This example could lead the reader to believe this alternative constructor can receive multiple iterable objects, when in fact it can receive only one. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 139802 nosy: RodolphoEckhardt, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Documentation for itertools.chain.from_iterable is incorrect versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12490> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12490] Documentation for itertools.chain.from_iterable is incorrect
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: My mistake reading the documentation. Sorry, closing this issue. -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12490> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12490] Documentation for itertools.chain.from_iterable is incorrect
Changes by Rodolpho Eckhardt : -- nosy: -docs@python resolution: -> invalid ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12490> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8078] add more baud constants to termios
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: Added those baud rates using #ifdef's because I'm not sure all platforms will define them. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Rodolpho.Eckhardt Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19693/termios_baud.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8078> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10220] Make generator state easier to introspect
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: This patch adds the getgeneratorstate function and related tests. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Rodolpho.Eckhardt Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19705/getgeneratorstate.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10220> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10220] Make generator state easier to introspect
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: Done, thank you! Second version attached. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19712/getgeneratorstate_v2.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10220> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8525] Small enhancement to help()
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: Migrated the patch to the 3.x trunk and added three tests. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Rodolpho.Eckhardt, henriquebastos Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19748/help_8525.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8525> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7695] missing termios constants
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: Because these constants might not exist on all platforms, the patch uses ifdef's around them. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Rodolpho.Eckhardt Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20015/patch_termios_consts_issue7695.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7695> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2118] smtplib.SMTP() raises socket.error rather than SMTPConnectError
Rodolpho Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Verified Werneck's patch and it also works on 2.6 and 3.0. However, the previous code used to present a "friendly" message about non-numeric ports: "socket.error: nonnumeric port" and now it raises "ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10". Should it be changed to inform that the exception is due to a non-numeric port? (Just wrap int(port) with a try and change the raised exception) -- nosy: +rodolpho versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2118> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3427] urllib documentation: urlopen().info() return type
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: Patch for 2.7. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13453/urllib_doc_2.7.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue3427> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3427] urllib documentation: urlopen().info() return type
Rodolpho Eckhardt added the comment: I'm including 2.7, as it also has this documentation problem. The rest of the documentation is correct. I know there is still work to be done on Issue 4773, which might affect this doc. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +rodolpho versions: +Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13452/urllib_doc_2.6.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue3427> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
