[issue46028] 3.11.0a3: under tox, sys._base_executable is wrong
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Steve, could this be related to the changes in getpath? -- nosy: +steve.dower ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46028> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46028] 3.11.0a3: under tox, sys._base_executable is wrong
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46028> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46028] 3.11.0a3: under tox, sys._base_executable is wrong
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Ned, are you able to bisect this or provide a simpler reproducer that doesn't involve tox? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46028> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43931] Add the Python version to the API data.
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43931> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46028] 3.11.0a3: under tox, sys._base_executable is wrong
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Indeed, seems my original hunch is correct. Steve, could you take a look when you have some time? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46028> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Thanks for the catch Carl! > I can try to fix this. Awesome, I will wait for the PR! -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28279 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30059 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Don't worry, turns out it was a bit messier than I thought, so I prepared the PR. If you have some time, it would be great if you can take a quick look. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 59435eea08d30796174552c0ca03c59b41adf8a5 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46042: Improve SyntaxError locations in the symbol table (GH-30059) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/59435eea08d30796174552c0ca03c59b41adf8a5 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > Oh no, I was about to open mine ;-) Sorry, Carl, I apologize. I hope it was not too disruptive to do the work. I was taking a look and I felt bad that the issue was probably messier than I thought and I didn't want you to have to iterate many times :( Thanks a lot for helping review the PR and for pointing out the extra cases!! -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46042] Error range of "duplicate argument" SyntaxErrors is too big
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 438817fdd5b731d486285d205bed2e78b655c0d6 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-46042: Improve SyntaxError locations in the symbol table (GH-30059) (GH-30064) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/438817fdd5b731d486285d205bed2e78b655c0d6 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46042> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46054] Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : Python3.9 shows: ../3.9/python /bin/ls SyntaxError: Non-UTF-8 code starting with '\xfc' in file /bin/ls on line 2, but no encoding declared; see https://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/ for detail while 3.10 shows: python /bin/ls File "/bin/ls", line 0 SyntaxError: unknown parsing error -- components: Parser messages: 408361 nosy: lys.nikolaou, pablogsal priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46054> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46054] Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28288 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30068 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46054> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46054] Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 4325a766f5f603ef6dfb8c4d5798e5e73cb5efd5 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46054: Fix parsing error when parsing non-utf8 characters in source files (GH-30068) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/4325a766f5f603ef6dfb8c4d5798e5e73cb5efd5 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46054> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46054] Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +28296 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30074 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46054> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46054] Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 94483f1e3cec182fabe19268e579f63045bc984a by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-46054: Fix parsing error when parsing non-utf8 characters in source files (GH-30068) (GH-30069) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/94483f1e3cec182fabe19268e579f63045bc984a -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46054> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46054] Incorrect error when parsing non-utf8 files
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset c6d1c52c166968fb722ae26d44aa2c1c030dc613 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46054: Correct non-utf8 character tests in test_exceptions (GH-30074) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c6d1c52c166968fb722ae26d44aa2c1c030dc613 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46054> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46091] IndendationError from multi-line indented statements
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is a side effect on the fix in: https://bugs.python.org/issue40847 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46091> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46091] IndendationError from multi-line indented statements
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Unfortunately I am not sure if this is going to be easier to retrofit for the reasons exposed in the issue. I will try to take a look, but if you have some cycles to spare, a PR would be welcomed. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46091> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46091] IndendationError from multi-line indented statements
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Actually, I am not sure if this is a bug, at least according to this comment: https://bugs.python.org/msg370812 What are your thoughts on this Guido? -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46091> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46091] IndendationError from multi-line indented statements
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28349 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30130 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46091> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46091] IndendationError from multi-line indented statements
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: nevermind, I am convinced is a bug. I filed a PR for it -- stage: patch review -> ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46091> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46091] IndendationError from multi-line indented statements
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg408657 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46091> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] `eval("-"*3000000 + "4")` in cmd causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46090] C extensions can't swap out live frames anymore
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: That is weird, but can happen for example if some pthread of some c extensión for example picks up the Gil, causing a new PyThreadState to be created and linked but has not called into Python yet. Basically, an external native thread that calls PyGILState_Ensure leaves a thread state with these characteristics. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46090> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46090] C extensions can't swap out live frames anymore
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Relevant section: https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/init.html#non-python-created-threads -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46090> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is a stack overflow in the parser, unfortunately, which unfortunately is very difficult to defend against. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is a known issue for recursive descendent parsers. The only thing we can do here is somehow limit the maximum stack depth of the C stack, but that can: * Slow down the parser. * Limit valid expressions that otherwise won't segfault. * Still don't work in certain systems. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I worked in the past in a refactor of the math based rules (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20696/files) that could prevent **this** particular example, but others could still make the parser crash by stack overflow -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6110] IDLE has two "Preferences..." menu's on OSX
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +pablogsal nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +28394 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30177 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue6110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I made a draft PR here: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30177 to fix the issue. But we should benchmark and evaluate it before deciding anything. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28395 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30177 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6110] IDLE has two "Preferences..." menu's on OSX
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +28396 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30177 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue6110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset e9898bf153d26059261ffef11f7643ae991e2a4c by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46110: Add a recursion check to avoid stack overflow in the PEG parser (GH-30177) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e9898bf153d26059261ffef11f7643ae991e2a4c -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +28435 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30214 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +28436 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30215 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset dc73199a212a44553578eb4952631e5ba9e5f292 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-46110: Add a recursion check to avoid stack overflow in the PEG parser (GH-30177) (GH-30214) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/dc73199a212a44553578eb4952631e5ba9e5f292 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset e5cf31d3c2b30d12f238c6ab26d15855eefb2a8a by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.9': [3.9] bpo-46110: Add a recursion check to avoid stack overflow in the PEG parser (GH-30177) (#30215) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e5cf31d3c2b30d12f238c6ab26d15855eefb2a8a -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue37295] Possible optimizations for math.comb()
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue37295> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46167] Parse assert (x == y, "Descriptive text") as statement params instead of a tuple
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I can try to prototype something in the parser to see how it looks and work on the pep if everything looks ok. Parentheses are a bit tricky in general as backtracking ends causing all sorts of tricky situations with custom syntax errors as the parser needs to distinguish between function calls, tuple construction and grouping so that's the only dangerous situation I can think of -- nosy: -gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46167> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46167] Parse assert (x == y, "Descriptive text") as statement params instead of a tuple
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
> We managed to do this for 'with' so it should be possible here too, I'd
> think. The "committing" token would be the newline following the close
> parenthesis.
I am not so sure is that inmediate. Changing the assert statement from:
'assert' a=expression b=[',' z=expression { z }]
to
| 'assert' '(' a=expression b=[',' z=expression { z }] ')'
| 'assert' a=expression b=[',' z=expression { z }]
will render this invalid:
assert (a, b) <= c, "something"
The reason is that it will parse the (a, b) as the assert statement eagerly and
then it will fail to parse the rest.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46167>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46167] Parse assert (x == y, "Descriptive text") as statement params instead of a tuple
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
We could do this, but feels a bit hacky:
| 'assert' '(' a=expression b=[',' z=expression { z }] ')' &(NEWLINE | ';')
| 'assert' a=expression b=[',' z=expression { z }]
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46167>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46167] Parse assert (x == y, "Descriptive text") as statement params instead of a tuple
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Another possibility is actually handled this in the compiler: if we see an assert with a tuple of two elements, we can assume is basically in the form that we want and proceed as if is in the form assert A, B This also feels a bit hacky because the AST is somehow wrong as the assert node is already prepared to differentiate these two cases. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46167> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46167] Parse assert (x == y, "Descriptive text") as statement params instead of a tuple
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28465 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30247 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46167> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46206] Crash when editing emoji containing strings
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This seems to be fixed on the main branch (at least I cannot reproduce it in the main branch). If so, this means that will be fixed in Python 3.10.2. 10maurycy10, could you please confirm that this is indeed the case? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46206> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46206] Crash when editing emoji containing strings
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46206> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46206] Crash when editing emoji containing strings
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Example: >>> ___😀 File "", line 1 ___😀 ^ SyntaxError: invalid character '😀' (U+1F600) >>> __😀 File "", line 1 __😀 ^ SyntaxError: invalid character '😀' (U+1F600) -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46206> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: >It seems that the PR was merged without discussion about 85% regression in >python_startup benchmark Ugh, that's quite bad. We measured performance impact in general and that was quite acceptable but seems that for startup this is quite sensitive :( There isn't many other ways we can do this that I can think of unfortunately, so we need to make a decision on what we care most here, unless someone has a better idea on how we can overcome the recursion problem. Adding Guido and Eric as they gave been working on startup quite a lot. -- nosy: +eric.snow, gvanrossum priority: normal -> release blocker status: closed -> open ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +lukasz.langa versions: +Python 3.11, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Guido, Eric, what are your thoughts here? The fix that I merged works by limiting the maximum recursion but seems that incrementing the recursion counter on every parser call makes quite a lot of impact on startup. Unfortunately if we revert the fix, we still have the problem that Python can segfault for certain inputs that overload the stack. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > Let me have a look. May take a day, okay?-- Absolutely! There is no rush as the only close release IIRC is another alpha of 3.11. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46230] NEWLINE* is missing in 'file' rule in PEG grammar
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I don't know what you mean with "it's missing". That is the actual rule used in the grammar: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/8e75c6b49b7cb8515b917f01b32ece8c8ea2c0a0/Grammar/python.gram#L88 -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46230> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46231] grammar rule definition is missing: invalid_double_starred_kvpairs
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: invalid_* rules are not part of the official grammar as they are only used for error reporting. We need to update the peg grammar highlighter to exclude it -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46231> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46231] grammar rule definition is missing: invalid_double_starred_kvpairs
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28553 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30341 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46231> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This are my results running directly the pyperformance run script (https://github.com/python/pyperformance/blob/main/pyperformance/data-files/benchmarks/bm_python_startup/run_benchmark.py) with and without the fix (both PGO/LTO): pablogsal@Obsidian-W:~$ ./cpython/python startup_benchmark.py --compare-to ./cpython_base/python python_with_fix: . 8.14 ms +- 0.17 ms python_with_reverted_fix: . 8.05 ms +- 0.16 ms Mean +- std dev: [python_with_fix] 8.14 ms +- 0.16 ms -> [python_with_reverted_fix] 8.05 ms +- 0.17 ms: 1.01x faster -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I am not able to reproduce on Linux either, with pyperformance or manual testing in the CLI. Interestingle, this shows up in both machines: https://speed.python.org/timeline/#/?exe=12&ben=python_startup&env=1&revs=50&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on https://speed.python.org/timeline/#/?exe=12&ben=python_startup&env=4&revs=50&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > Does python_startup benchmark start with all modules parsed and __pycache__d, > or with no cache, so it includes the normally one-time parse time? I don't know what pyperf does with the cache (adding Victor as maybe he knowns). -- nosy: +vstinner ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Ran pyperformance with PGO/LTO CPU-isol on my Linux box and I cannot reproduce either: ❯ pyperf compare_to json/* --table --table-format=md -G | Benchmark | 2021-12-20_10-23-master-6ca78affc802 | 2021-12-20_15-43-master-e9898bf153d2 | ||::|::| | python_startup | 19.7 ms | 19.0 ms: 1.03x faster | -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > Maybe something unrelated changed on the benchmark machines? Very unlikely, it happened on two separate machines with different distributions and nothing was updated in the machines that I can see. Both use a configuration file for pyperformance that looks like this: - $ cat bench.conf [config] json_dir = ~/json_cron [scm] repo_dir = ~/cpython_cron update = True remote = origin [compile] lto = True pgo = True bench_dir = ~/bench_tmpdir_cron [run_benchmark] system_tune = True upload = False [upload] url = https://speed.python.org/ environment = speed-python executable = lto-pgo project = CPython [compile_all] [compile_all_revisions] COMMIT_SHA=master -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42202] Optimize function annotation
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42202> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > I propose a test: revert the PR and see if speed.Python.org shows a speedup back to the previous number.-- Ok, let's do that and see what happens -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +28577 stage: resolved -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30363 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 9d35dedc5e7e940b639230fba93c763bd9f19c09 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': Revert "bpo-46110: Add a recursion check to avoid stack overflow in the PEG parser (GH-30177)" (GH-30363) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9d35dedc5e7e940b639230fba93c763bd9f19c09 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +28579 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30366 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue44092] [sqlite3] Remove special rollback handling
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 9d6a239a34a66e16188d76c23a3a770515ca44ca by Erlend Egeberg Aasland in branch 'main': bpo-44092: Don't reset statements/cursors before rollback (GH-26026) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9d6a239a34a66e16188d76c23a3a770515ca44ca -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue44092> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue44092] [sqlite3] Remove special rollback handling
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue44092> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I ran the benchmarks machines with the revert and seems that it doesn't go back to the previous timing: https://speed.python.org/timeline/#/?exe=12&ben=python_startup&env=1&revs=50&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on (check last data point for https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9d35dedc5e7e940b639230fba93c763bd9f19c09). So this seems that the difference in speed remains a mystery but is not due to this fix. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: https://speed.python.org/timeline/#/?exe=12&ben=python_startup&env=4&revs=50&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on also doesn't show any difference with the revert -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset dd6c35761a4cd417e126a2d51dd0b89c8a30e5de by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46110: Restore commit e9898bf153d26059261ffef11f7643ae991e2a4c https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/dd6c35761a4cd417e126a2d51dd0b89c8a30e5de -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: At thing at this point we can confidently say that is very very unlike that there is no actual regression. What's going on with the performance servers is something I still cannot explain. I at least can confirm the servers system packages were not updated between these runs but I cannot think of anything that could have influenced that change. I propose to close this issue as we are clearly unable to reproduce said slowdown. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > I presume you mean > "it is very very *likely* that there is no actual regression" Yes, sorry, that's what I meant :) > This shouldn't hold up releases Cool, we will proceed with 3.9.10 and 3.11.0a3 tomorrow. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46240] Incorrect hint about forgetting a comma
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +28588 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30378 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46240> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue44092] [sqlite3] Remove special rollback handling
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset a09062c267a94200ad299f779429fea1b571ee35 by Erlend Egeberg Aasland in branch 'main': bpo-44092: Move What's New entry to where it belongs (GH-30381) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a09062c267a94200ad299f779429fea1b571ee35 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue44092> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46240] Incorrect hint about forgetting a comma
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 70f415fb8b632247e28d87998642317ca7a652ae by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46240: Correct the error for unclosed parentheses when the tokenizer is not finished (GH-30378) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/70f415fb8b632247e28d87998642317ca7a652ae -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46240> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46231] grammar rule definition is missing: invalid_double_starred_kvpairs
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset e09d94a140a5f6903017da9b6ac752ba041d69da by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46231: Remove invalid_* rules preceded by more tokens from the grammar docs (GH-30341) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e09d94a140a5f6903017da9b6ac752ba041d69da -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46231> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46231] grammar rule definition is missing: invalid_double_starred_kvpairs
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46231> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46240] Incorrect hint about forgetting a comma
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Thanks Andre for the report! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46240> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20369] concurrent.futures.wait() blocks forever when given duplicate Futures
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 7d7817cf0f826e566d8370a0e974bbfed6611d91 by Kumar Aditya in branch 'main': bpo-20369: concurrent.futures.wait() now deduplicates futures given a… (GH-30168) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7d7817cf0f826e566d8370a0e974bbfed6611d91 -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue20369> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46260] Misleading SyntaxError on f-string
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46260> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46110] compile("-"*3000000 + "4", '', mode) causes hard crash
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I did a run of pyperformance manually forcing setuptools<60.0 and another with setuptools>=60.0 I can reproduce the timing difference. I assume we can therefore close this issue and maybe open another one thinking about how to deal with the setuptools problem (maybe reaching to the package maintainera). -- stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46110> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46263] FreeBSL buiildbots cannot compile Python
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : Seems that the FreeBSD buildbots cannot compile Python 3.11 anymore: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build CC='cc -pthread' LDSHARED='cc -pthread -shared' OPT='-g -O0 -Wall' _TCLTK_INCLUDES='' _TCLTK_LIBS='' ./python -E ./setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build/./setup.py", line 49, in from distutils.command.build_ext import build_ext ^ File "/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build/Lib/distutils/command/build_ext.py", line 13, in from distutils.sysconfig import customize_compiler, get_python_version ^^ File "/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build/Lib/distutils/sysconfig.py", line 53, in _config_vars = get_config_vars() ^ File "/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build/Lib/sysconfig.py", line 621, in get_config_vars _init_posix(_CONFIG_VARS) ^ File "/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build/Lib/sysconfig.py", line 482, in _init_posix _temp = __import__(name, globals(), locals(), ['build_time_vars'], 0) ^ ModuleNotFoundError: No module named '_sysconfigdata_d_freebsd14_x86_64-unknown-freebsd14' *** [sharedmods] Error code 1 make: stopped in /usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build make: stopped in /usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-564d/build https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/483/builds/1408 -- messages: 409719 nosy: lukasz.langa, pablogsal priority: release blocker severity: normal status: open title: FreeBSL buiildbots cannot compile Python versions: Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46263> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue40222] "Zero cost" exception handling
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Can this be closed? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue40222> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43137] webbrowser to support "gio open "
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: If this is not fixed by this week, I will be forced to revert the PR -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43137> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46263] FreeBSL buiildbots cannot compile Python
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: There is also this other builder: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/172/builds/1093 failing what what seems is a freeze problem: - 'use_frozen_modules': 1, + 'use_frozen_modules': -1, ?+ 'use_hash_seed': 0, 'user_site_directory': 1, 'verbose': 0, 'warn_default_encoding': 0, 'warnoptions': [], 'write_bytecode': 1, 'xoptions': []} -- Ran 1 test in 0.152s FAILED (failures=1) test test_embed failed 1 test failed again: test_embed Adding Eric and Guido for this particular problem to the nosy list -- nosy: +eric.snow, gvanrossum ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46263> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43683] Handle generator (and coroutine) state in the bytecode.
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Is there anything left here? -- priority: release blocker -> ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43683> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46236] PyFunction_GetAnnotations returning Tuple vs Dict
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Yeah, the docs mention explicitly that is a dictionary or NULL. -- priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46236> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46236] PyFunction_GetAnnotations returning Tuple vs Dict
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46236> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46236] PyFunction_GetAnnotations returning Tuple vs Dict
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I am quite sure this is due to PR 23316 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46236> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43137] webbrowser to support "gio open "
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: >> I am not a regular CPython developer, so I don't have a good way to assess >> which reviewers speak for the project and which reviewers are only offering >> a personal opinion. In this webpage (bpo) core developers have a little python logo close to their name (as myself). In GitHub, you can sometimes tell by hovering over the profile or checking the core dev log in the devguide: https://devguide.python.org/developers/ -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43137> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43137] webbrowser to support "gio open "
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset dd50316e458d7c3284f8948b0606d8aa91ab855d by Simon McVittie in branch 'main': bpo-43137: Revert "webbrowser: Don't run gvfs-open on GNOME" (GH-30417) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/dd50316e458d7c3284f8948b0606d8aa91ab855d -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43137> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43137] webbrowser to support "gio open "
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I am removing the "release blocker" tag. Simon, thanks a lot for both PRs. I am sorry that we needed to revert your original work, but unfortunately it was blocking a release and we are forced to act in this case. PLease, work together with Christian and Matthias to make a version of the patch that works in all supported platforms. -- priority: release blocker -> ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43137> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46236] PyFunction_GetAnnotations returning Tuple vs Dict
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- priority: release blocker -> resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46236> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45665] Problems caused by isinstance(list[int], type) returning True
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Gentle ping, as the next alpha will be release soon -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45665> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45665] Problems caused by isinstance(list[int], type) returning True
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45665> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46274] backslash creating statement out of nothing
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46274> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46275] caret location for syntax error pointing with f-strings
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46275> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46263] FreeBSD buildbots cannot compile Python
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Unfortunately the buildbots are still red:
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/483/builds/1416/steps/5/logs/stdio
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/172/builds/1102
One is the test_embed problem with frozen modules:
==
FAIL: test_init_setpythonhome (test.test_embed.InitConfigTests)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/Lib/test/test_embed.py",
line 1253, in test_init_setpythonhome
self.check_all_configs("test_init_setpythonhome", config,
^
File
"/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/Lib/test/test_embed.py",
line 736, in check_all_configs
self.check_config(configs, expected_config)
^^^
File
"/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/Lib/test/test_embed.py",
line 662, in check_config
self.assertEqual(config, expected)
^^
AssertionError: {'_co[346 chars]'], 'xoptions': [], 'warnoptions': [],
'python[1945 chars]': 1} != {'_co[346 chars]'], 'orig_argv': [], 'xoptions':
[], 'warnopti[1946 chars]: -1}
{'_config_init': 1,
'_init_main': 1,
'_install_importlib': 1,
'_isolated_interpreter': 0,
'argv': [''],
'base_exec_prefix':
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build',
'base_executable': '',
'base_prefix':
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build',
'buffered_stdio': 1,
'bytes_warning': 0,
'check_hash_pycs_mode': 'default',
'code_debug_ranges': 1,
'configure_c_stdio': 0,
'dev_mode': 0,
'dump_refs': 0,
'exec_prefix':
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build',
'executable': '',
'faulthandler': 0,
'hash_seed': 0,
'home': '/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build',
'import_time': 0,
'inspect': 0,
'install_signal_handlers': 1,
'interactive': 0,
'isolated': 0,
'malloc_stats': 0,
'module_search_paths':
['/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/target/lib/python311.zip',
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/Lib',
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/build/lib.freebsd-12.3-RELEASE-amd64-3.11',
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/lib/python311.zip',
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/lib/python3.11',
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/lib/python3.11/lib-dynload'],
'module_search_paths_set': 1,
'optimization_level': 0,
'orig_argv': [],
'parse_argv': 0,
'parser_debug': 0,
'pathconfig_warnings': 1,
'platlibdir': 'lib',
'prefix': '/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build',
'program_name': 'python3',
'pycache_prefix': None,
'pythonpath_env':
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/target/lib/python311.zip:/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/Lib:/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/build/lib.freebsd-12.3-RELEASE-amd64-3.11',
'quiet': 0,
'run_command': None,
'run_filename': None,
'run_module': None,
'show_ref_count': 0,
'site_import': 1,
'skip_source_first_line': 0,
'stdlib_dir':
'/usr/home/buildbot/python/3.x.koobs-freebsd-9e36.nondebug/build/lib/python3.11',
'tracemalloc': 0,
'use_environment': 1,
- 'use_frozen_modules': 1,
+ 'use_frozen_modules': -1,
?+
'use_hash_seed': 0,
'user_site_directory': 1,
'verbose': 0,
'warn_default_encoding': 0,
'warnoptions': [],
'write_bytecode': 1,
'xoptions': []}
---
[issue46256] Objects __del__ called after module have been removed
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This doesn't look like a bug to me and is documented behavior: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__del__ Check this paragraph: Warning Due to the precarious circumstances under which __del__() methods are invoked, exceptions that occur during their execution are ignored, and a warning is printed to sys.stderr instead. In particular: __del__() can be invoked when arbitrary code is being executed, including from any arbitrary thread. If __del__() needs to take a lock or invoke any other blocking resource, it may deadlock as the resource may already be taken by the code that gets interrupted to execute __del__(). __del__() can be executed during interpreter shutdown. As a consequence, the global variables it needs to access (including other modules) may already have been deleted or set to None. Python guarantees that globals whose name begins with a single underscore are deleted from their module before other globals are deleted; if no other references to such globals exist, this may help in assuring that imported modules are still available at the time when the __del__() method is called. Here, the object __del__ should take s strong reference to whatever is going to use to ensure is available when needed. Indeed, the standard library does this regularly, for example: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/f4c03484da59049eb62a9bfb963e2267d187/Lib/asyncio/windows_utils.py#L110 I am closing it as "not a bug" but feel free to reopen if we think we missed something or I misinterpret the bug report. -- nosy: +pablogsal resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46256> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
