Martin Ponweiser added the comment:
You are right, I should have looked closer -- sorry to all involved.
Nevertheless this caused some confusion here. I guess mentioning the
inconsistency in the documentation is out of the question.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
>
> Petri Lehtinen added the comment:
>
> The name of the "level" parameter to LogRecord constructor is correct in
> the documentation (I checked the code). The only inconsitency that I see is
> that the corresponding attribute name of LogRecord is "levelno".
>
> --
> nosy: +petri.lehtinen
>
> ___
> Python tracker
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12206>
> ___
>
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22187/unnamed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12206>
___You are right, I should have looked closer -- sorry to all involved.
Nevertheless this caused some confusion here. I guess mentioning the
inconsistency in the documentation is out of the question.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Petri Lehtinen <mailto:rep...@bugs.python.org";>rep...@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
Petri Lehtinen <mailto:pe...@digip.org";>pe...@digip.org>
added the comment:
The name of the "level" parameter to LogRecord constructor is correct
in the documentation (I checked the code). The only inconsitency that I see is
that the corresponding attribute name of LogRecord is "levelno".
--
nosy: +petri.lehtinen
___
Python tracker <mailto:rep...@bugs.python.org";>rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12206";
target="_blank">http://bugs.python.org/issue12206>
___
-- Martin
PonweiserFrauengasse 4/8, 2700 Wr. Neustadt, Austriacell phone: 0043
650-68 27 949 (no SMS inbox)
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
