[issue31904] Python should support VxWorks RTOS

2017-10-30 Thread Brian Kuhl 

New submission from Brian Kuhl :

With the trend to use REST APIs between the cloud and the IoT there is 
increasing interest in Python on embedded devices.  Cloud developer’s typical 
release a reference REST implementation of JSON and/or Python on Linux and 
leave it to the device developer to adapt it to their platform.   While many 
devices use eLinux, others with IP and/or hard real-time constraints need a 
commercial RTOS platform. 

Currently the automake configure explicitly prevents configuration of VxWorks 
as a build target.

I'll provide a pull request referencing this issue with the required changes.

--
components: Cross-Build
messages: 305249
nosy: Alex.Willmer, Brian Kuhl
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Python should support VxWorks RTOS
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.7

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31904>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue31904] Python should support VxWorks RTOS

2017-10-30 Thread Brian Kuhl 

Change by Brian Kuhl :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4149
stage:  -> patch review

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31904>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue31904] Python should support VxWorks RTOS

2017-10-30 Thread Brian Kuhl 

Change by Brian Kuhl :


--
pull_requests: +4155

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31904>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue31904] Python should support VxWorks RTOS

2017-11-08 Thread Brian Kuhl 

Brian Kuhl  added the comment:

I'm quite happy to take on maintainer role for Python on VxWorks, so I think we 
can get that one solved. 

Enabling a build bot for cross compile of propitiatory OS presents a number of 
legal licensing issues that outside my control. And I'll discuss it internally 
at Wind River. However I think it is in line with where our customers want us 
to go, so well worth pursuing. 

I'll keep this pull request active and up to date, till the broader issues you 
have raised can be resolved.  

I'll post a proposal on the mailing list after I consulted within Wind River.

Many thanks for your interest and support.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31904>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com