[issue3799] Byte/string inconsistencies between different dbm modules
Changes by Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +bboissin ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3799> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3799] Byte/string inconsistencies between different dbm modules
Changes by Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3799> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3799] Byte/string inconsistencies between different dbm modules
Changes by Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: -bboissin ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3799> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3187] os.listdir can return byte strings
Changes by Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +bboissin ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3187> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2848] Remove mimetools usage from the stdlib
Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Why does it need to be in 2.6? mimetools is still there. Because it outputs a warning with python2.6 -3, it's annoying for people trying to port their application to python3k -- nosy: +bboissin ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2848> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4753] Faster opcode dispatch on gcc
Changes by Benoit Boissinot : -- nosy: +bboissin ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue4753> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4948] Make heapq work with all mutable sequences
New submission from Benoit Boissinot : Generalize heapq to work with all kind of mutable sequences. It should be investigated PySequence_SetItem is a lot slower than PyList_SET_ITEM (same for GET_ITEM and GET_SIZE). -- components: Extension Modules messages: 79859 nosy: bboissin severity: normal status: open title: Make heapq work with all mutable sequences type: feature request ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue4948> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4948] Make heapq work with all mutable sequences
Benoit Boissinot added the comment: I was thinking about array.array. I don't know if it would be faster than using a list, but it seemed elegant to be able to do a heap on it anyway. ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue4948> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
