[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Andrea De Pasquale added the comment: Hello, did you have a chance to look at my patch? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Andrea De Pasquale added the comment: Ok thanks, please kindly let me know. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Changes by Andrea De Pasquale : -- nosy: +adepasquale ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Andrea De Pasquale added the comment: Isn't this covered by the following test case? Lib/test/test_email/test_defect_handling.py:18 -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Andrea De Pasquale added the comment: How about the following patch? If it's different from what you had in mind, please let me know. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file43016/issue27010-notuniqueboundary.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Andrea De Pasquale added the comment: Yes you are right, my patch produces an RFC2046-compliant output and also registers the "not-unique-boundary" defect. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27010] email library could "recover" from bad mime boundary like (some?) email clients do
Andrea De Pasquale added the comment: To provide additional context, Microsoft has patched his Outlook client to be RFC2046-compliant. More details below: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-3366 https://technet.microsoft.com/library/security/MS16-107 http://www.certego.net/en/news/badepilogue-the-perfect-evasion/ -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue27010> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
