[PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread dealTek
Hi all,

I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use one 
mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish tables per 
project like...


Project 1

mysales_contacts
mysales_invoices
etc

and

jobs_contacts
jobs_invoices

however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like tbl_Mytable but 
I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am I missing something?



--
Thanks,
Dave - DealTek
deal...@gmail.com
[db-3]



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Ashley Sheridan


dealTek  wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use
>one mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish
>tables per project like...
>
>
>Project 1
>
>mysales_contacts
>mysales_invoices
>etc
>
>and
>
>jobs_contacts
>jobs_invoices
>
>however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like
>tbl_Mytable but I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am
>I missing something?
>
>
>
>--
>Thanks,
>Dave - DealTek
>deal...@gmail.com
>[db-3]

I think that's a pattern that people use to distinguish their tables from 
views, etc, but personally I find it a little pointless. It doesn't really help 
in any way, and just means more typing.

Using a prefix for a set of tables in one db where you might have several 
things using the db (i.e. some hosting limits the databases you can have) makes 
sense, and especially so if you name it sensibly as in your first example. 
Thanks,
Ash

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Tedd Sperling
On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Ashley Sheridan  wrote:
dealTek  wrote:
> 
>> I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use
>> one mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish
>> tables per project like...
>> 
>> -snip-
>> however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like
>> tbl_Mytable but I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am
>> I missing something?
> 
> I think that's a pattern that people use to distinguish their tables from 
> views, etc, but personally I find it a little pointless. It doesn't really 
> help in any way, and just means more typing.
> 
> Using a prefix for a set of tables in one db where you might have several 
> things using the db (i.e. some hosting limits the databases you can have) 
> makes sense, and especially so if you name it sensibly as in your first 
> example. 
> Thanks,
> Ash

I agree, but more than that I also set up databases specifically for clients 
such that all the tables in them are related to the client and not each other, 
such as:

client1_db

contacts
invoices
etc

and

client2_db

contacts
invoices
etc

As such, the "tbl_" prefix is not needed.

Cheers,

tedd

_
tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
http://sperling.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Julian Wanke
A database for each client? Isn't that over-powered? If you have 1000  
clients, you would loose the overview over your databases...


Am 08.06.2013, 21:46 Uhr, schrieb Tedd Sperling :

On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Ashley Sheridan   
wrote:

dealTek  wrote:



I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use
one mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish
tables per project like...

-snip-
however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like
tbl_Mytable but I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am
I missing something?


I think that's a pattern that people use to distinguish their tables  
from views, etc, but personally I find it a little pointless. It  
doesn't really help in any way, and just means more typing.


Using a prefix for a set of tables in one db where you might have  
several things using the db (i.e. some hosting limits the databases you  
can have) makes sense, and especially so if you name it sensibly as in  
your first example.

Thanks,
Ash


I agree, but more than that I also set up databases specifically for  
clients such that all the tables in them are related to the client and  
not each other, such as:


client1_db

contacts
invoices
etc

and

client2_db

contacts
invoices
etc

As such, the "tbl_" prefix is not needed.

Cheers,

tedd

_
tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
http://sperling.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Tamara Temple
Tedd Sperling  wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Ashley Sheridan  wrote:
> dealTek  wrote:
> > 
> >> I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use
> >> one mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish
> >> tables per project like...
> >> 
> >> -snip-
> >> however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like
> >> tbl_Mytable but I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am
> >> I missing something?
> > 
> > I think that's a pattern that people use to distinguish their tables from 
> > views, etc, but personally I find it a little pointless. It doesn't really 
> > help in any way, and just means more typing.
> > 
> > Using a prefix for a set of tables in one db where you might have several 
> > things using the db (i.e. some hosting limits the databases you can have) 
> > makes sense, and especially so if you name it sensibly as in your first 
> > example. 
> > Thanks,
> > Ash
> 
> I agree, but more than that I also set up databases specifically for clients 
> such that all the tables in them are related to the client and not each 
> other, such as:
> 
> client1_db
> 
> contacts
> invoices
> etc
> 
> and
> 
> client2_db
> 
> contacts
> invoices
> etc
> 
> As such, the "tbl_" prefix is not needed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> tedd
> 
> _
> tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
> http://sperling.com
> -- 
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 

In a multi-client situation like Tedd describes, it is rather more
important to segregate client's data, otherwise you need to do a fair
bit of permissions management to keep rogue employees/contractors at the
various clients from snooping around. (It happens!)

OTOH, when it's your own apps, and you are db restricted as Ash
mentions, the table prefix thing can be useful. Personally, I don't do
that, but that's because I am rarely resource-bound in that way. One db
per app, basically.



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Tamara Temple
Julian Wanke  wrote:
> A database for each client? Isn't that over-powered? If you have 1000
> clients, you would loose the overview over your databases...

I believe what is being talked about is one DB per application install --
'client' can be a way-overloaded term.


> 
> Am 08.06.2013, 21:46 Uhr, schrieb Tedd Sperling :
> 
> > On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> >  wrote:
> > dealTek  wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use
> >>> one mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish
> >>> tables per project like...
> >>>
> >>> -snip-
> >>> however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like
> >>> tbl_Mytable but I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am
> >>> I missing something?
> >>
> >> I think that's a pattern that people use to distinguish their
> >> tables from views, etc, but personally I find it a little
> >> pointless. It  doesn't really help in any way, and just means more
> >> typing.
> >>
> >> Using a prefix for a set of tables in one db where you might have
> >> several things using the db (i.e. some hosting limits the databases
> >> you  can have) makes sense, and especially so if you name it
> >> sensibly as in  your first example.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ash
> >
> > I agree, but more than that I also set up databases specifically for
> > clients such that all the tables in them are related to the client
> > and  not each other, such as:
> >
> > client1_db
> >
> > contacts
> > invoices
> > etc
> >
> > and
> >
> > client2_db
> >
> > contacts
> > invoices
> > etc
> >
> > As such, the "tbl_" prefix is not needed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > tedd
> >
> > _
> > tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
> > http://sperling.com
> > --
> > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Bastien


Bastien Koert

On 2013-06-08, at 5:58 PM, Tamara Temple  wrote:

> Julian Wanke  wrote:
>> A database for each client? Isn't that over-powered? If you have 1000
>> clients, you would loose the overview over your databases...
> 
> I believe what is being talked about is one DB per application install --
> 'client' can be a way-overloaded term.


Some projects or apps require one db per client. But it does become a pain to 
manage. 


Bastien

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Using Table prefixes

2013-06-08 Thread Bastien


Bastien Koert

On 2013-06-08, at 5:56 PM, Tamara Temple  wrote:

> Tedd Sperling  wrote:
>> On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Ashley Sheridan  
>> wrote:
>> dealTek  wrote:
>>> 
 I can see the basic need for a table prefix in a case where you may use
 one mysql database for several projects at once so as to distinguish
 tables per project like...
 
 -snip-
 however I was told a long time ago to use a prefix "tbl_" like
 tbl_Mytable but I don't really see much need for this by itself ... Am
 I missing something?
>>> 
>>> I think that's a pattern that people use to distinguish their tables from 
>>> views, etc, but personally I find it a little pointless. It doesn't really 
>>> help in any way, and just means more typing.
>>> 
>>> Using a prefix for a set of tables in one db where you might have several 
>>> things using the db (i.e. some hosting limits the databases you can have) 
>>> makes sense, and especially so if you name it sensibly as in your first 
>>> example. 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ash
>> 
>> I agree, but more than that I also set up databases specifically for clients 
>> such that all the tables in them are related to the client and not each 
>> other, such as:
>> 
>> client1_db
>> 
>> contacts
>> invoices
>> etc
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> client2_db
>> 
>> contacts
>> invoices
>> etc
>> 
>> As such, the "tbl_" prefix is not needed.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> tedd
>> 
>> _
>> tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
>> http://sperling.com
>> -- 
>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
> In a multi-client situation like Tedd describes, it is rather more
> important to segregate client's data, otherwise you need to do a fair
> bit of permissions management to keep rogue employees/contractors at the
> various clients from snooping around. (It happens!)
> 
> OTOH, when it's your own apps, and you are db restricted as Ash
> mentions, the table prefix thing can be useful. Personally, I don't do
> that, but that's because I am rarely resource-bound in that way. One db
> per app, basically.
> 

I have run into situations where I prefix with the app name due to same table 
names in the same db. This was on a large db2 install. 



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php