Re: [PHP] long running php script won't complete :(
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:57 PM, rene7705 wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I've got a piece of code that builds up a multi-meg test array for my >> opensourced http://mediabeez.ws/products/htmlMicroscope var_dump() >> improvement, and when I run it for longer than about 20 minutes, the >> browser just calls it quits.. :( Firefox, and chrome. >> >> I'd like to do this with a browser call, if all else fails I suppose I >> can run the generation of the test array from the commandline, but I >> prefer calling from the browser.. >> >> So, I'm doing ob_start(), then start the main loop which does echo >> '.'; ob_flush(); flush();. >> >> I've got my KeepAliveTime set to 25 seconds, as per >> http://www.pctools.com/guides/registry/detail/891/ >> >> And I'm calling this from my browser to the domain name that points >> back to the machine I run the browser on, latest wampserver on windows >> 7. >> Calling via localhost doesn't work somehow. >> >> Is there anything obvious I've missed? >> > > Just to be sure, have you checked the Apache error logs for anything > obvious? (eg. out of memory?) > In case the browser closes the connection, you could use > ignore_user_abort [1] to be sure the script continues, though the > browser won't receive the result. > > - Matijn > > [1] www.php.net/manual/en/function.ignore-user-abort.php ignore_user_abort(true) together with set_time_limit(0) is doing the job nicely atm. thanks! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] disabled cookies
Matijn Woudt wrote: Yeah, it's been such a pain, as nobody over here is quite sure how the > hell it'll be enforced either, or if it even will be. It's also pretty > vague as to just where the line gets drawn. The official government > sites on this are pretty black and white, but don't clearly address the > grey areas. I think this is definitely a case of the persons making the > laws don't understand the technology involved, which sadly seems to be > the case across a lot of tech laws being passed world-wide of late:( > Yep, When this law was discussed, they were mostly talking about completely banning cookies. Only later they figured out that there are quite a few sites that can't live without cookies... Cookies for shopping baskets got flagged up early on and then people started to realise that there were more good reasons for using the than bad ;) The main 'grey' area is a session cookie which classified along with shopping basket ones - which don't need specific permission - but then we are told we should still ask? But we don't need to ask about shopping basket ones! -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 0.0.0.0 & iplong()
On 06/04/2012 12:48 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, jas wrote: On 06/04/2012 11:33 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, jaswrote: Not sure if this is a bug or not... I have run into an error when performing a conditional using iplong() and the ~ bitwise operator $ip = '0.0.0.0'; $mask = '24'; $end = (ip2long($ip) || (~ip2long($mask))) + 1; PHP Fatal error: Unsupported operand types I even tried to typecast the mask to (int) The error is probably not where you suspect it to be. ip2long will return false for ip2long($mask), because $mask is not a valid IP address. The ~ operator is not supported for false. - Matijn Strange... this works $ip = '10.0.2.0'; $mask = '24'; Anything using 0.0.0.0 fails using the bitmask to calculate valid CIDR ranges. Yes, because with $ip being 0.0.0.0, the result of ip2long($ip) will be zero. Zero evaluates to false when PHP is going to parse the || operator, and because of that, it continues to parse the rest. When the result of ip2long($ip) is greater that zero, in case of some other valid IP, it will evaluate to true and PHP will not even execute the rest after the || because the result will be true anyway. Did you mean to use a single | operator, as a bitwise OR? - Matijn With any ACL rule using iptables, hosts.allow/hosts.deny, routers where 0.0.0.0/24 is specified (all of the internet ipv4 addresses) this is a valid range using CIDR notation. It seems like a bug to me -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 0.0.0.0 & iplong()
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:07 PM, jas wrote: > On 06/04/2012 12:48 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, jas wrote: >>> >>> On 06/04/2012 11:33 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, jas wrote: > > > Not sure if this is a bug or not... > > I have run into an error when performing a conditional using iplong() > and > the ~ bitwise operator > > $ip = '0.0.0.0'; > $mask = '24'; > > $end = (ip2long($ip) || (~ip2long($mask))) + 1; > > PHP Fatal error: Unsupported operand types > > I even tried to typecast the mask to (int) > The error is probably not where you suspect it to be. ip2long will return false for ip2long($mask), because $mask is not a valid IP address. The ~ operator is not supported for false. - Matijn >>> >>> >>> >>> Strange... this works >>> >>> $ip = '10.0.2.0'; >>> $mask = '24'; >>> >>> Anything using 0.0.0.0 fails using the bitmask to calculate valid CIDR >>> ranges. >>> >> >> Yes, because with $ip being 0.0.0.0, the result of ip2long($ip) will >> be zero. Zero evaluates to false when PHP is going to parse the || >> operator, and because of that, it continues to parse the rest. >> When the result of ip2long($ip) is greater that zero, in case of some >> other valid IP, it will evaluate to true and PHP will not even execute >> the rest after the || because the result will be true anyway. >> Did you mean to use a single | operator, as a bitwise OR? >> >> - Matijn > > > With any ACL rule using iptables, hosts.allow/hosts.deny, routers where > 0.0.0.0/24 is specified (all of the internet ipv4 addresses) this is a valid > range using CIDR notation. > > It seems like a bug to me > Nope, there's no bug here. Can you explain what you're trying to do with ip2long($mask)? - Matijn -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 0.0.0.0 & iplong()
On 06/05/2012 05:40 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:07 PM, jas wrote: On 06/04/2012 12:48 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, jaswrote: On 06/04/2012 11:33 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, jas wrote: Not sure if this is a bug or not... I have run into an error when performing a conditional using iplong() and the ~ bitwise operator $ip = '0.0.0.0'; $mask = '24'; $end = (ip2long($ip) || (~ip2long($mask))) + 1; PHP Fatal error: Unsupported operand types I even tried to typecast the mask to (int) The error is probably not where you suspect it to be. ip2long will return false for ip2long($mask), because $mask is not a valid IP address. The ~ operator is not supported for false. - Matijn Strange... this works $ip = '10.0.2.0'; $mask = '24'; Anything using 0.0.0.0 fails using the bitmask to calculate valid CIDR ranges. Yes, because with $ip being 0.0.0.0, the result of ip2long($ip) will be zero. Zero evaluates to false when PHP is going to parse the || operator, and because of that, it continues to parse the rest. When the result of ip2long($ip) is greater that zero, in case of some other valid IP, it will evaluate to true and PHP will not even execute the rest after the || because the result will be true anyway. Did you mean to use a single | operator, as a bitwise OR? - Matijn With any ACL rule using iptables, hosts.allow/hosts.deny, routers where 0.0.0.0/24 is specified (all of the internet ipv4 addresses) this is a valid range using CIDR notation. It seems like a bug to me Nope, there's no bug here. Can you explain what you're trying to do with ip2long($mask)? - Matijn As stated previously using CIDR notation such as 192.168.0.0/24, 10.0.0.0/24 perform validation on an IP existing within said subnet range. visiting ip: 192.168.0.22 acl allow range: 192.168.0.0/24 acl deny range: 0.0.0.0/24 CIDR notation allows me to utilize shorthand notation for specifying a range of IP's In those two cases any ip within 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is allowed while anything else residing between 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255 is denied The problem is I can perform operations on CIDR ranges such as the following: 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/16 10.0.0.0/24 But cannot use the traditional 0.0.0.0/24 because iplong() evaluates 0.0.0.0 as false thereby invalidating a valid CIDR notation when evaluated as (ip2long($ip) || (~ip2long($mask))) + 1; From my own tests only 0.0.0.0/24 fails or as shown in the example code above (ip2long(0.0.0.0) || (~ip2long(24))) + 1; The class I am using to test with can be found at http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.ip2long.php#108812 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 0.0.0.0 & iplong()
> acl allow range: 192.168.0.0/24 > acl deny range: 0.0.0.0/24 > > CIDR notation allows me to utilize shorthand notation for specifying a range > of IP's > > In those two cases any ip within 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is allowed > while anything else residing between 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255 is denied Na-uh. You want 0.0.0.0/0, which is valid. 0.0.0.0/24 isn't valid. -- Regards, Chris Knipe -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Which workstation????
hi guys i really confuse by choosing the best work station for php ( cakephp , smarty , net bean , ... ) , please give me some advisdes. and please tell why which one is better, tnx best regards farzan
Re: [PHP] Which workstation????
Hi, Farzan I do not really get your point of confusion ... What you've posted here are tools/frameworks that do not to the same stuff at all, yes you could even use all without missing something ... cakephp .. is a full-stack PHP-Framework. Yes, I have to say that there's quite a bunch of full-stack frameworks in PHP you could choose and I myself would recommend one by knowing how much experience you have in PHP :) smarty .. is a template-engine for PHP. If you want to use smarty, twig, php itself or another library as template-engine is up to you. Using a template-engine for some programmers I know just feel like a better separation between the view and the controler/model (search for ModelViewControler if you don't know what I mean here). netbeans .. is an IDE where you can develop with. I prefer to use PhpStorm, others use EclipsePDT, Notepad++ or even the basic editor of windows. This is just about syntax-highlight, code-completion and other things helping you to develop your code. Hope that helps :) Bye Simon On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Farzan Dalaee wrote: > hi guys > i really confuse by choosing the best work station for php ( cakephp , > smarty , net bean , ... ) , please give me some advisdes. > and please tell why which one is better, > tnx > best regards farzan
Re: [PHP] 0.0.0.0 & iplong()
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:49 PM, jas wrote:
>
>
> As stated previously using CIDR notation such as 192.168.0.0/24, 10.0.0.0/24
> perform validation on an IP existing within said subnet range.
>
> visiting ip: 192.168.0.22
>
> acl allow range: 192.168.0.0/24
> acl deny range: 0.0.0.0/24
>
> CIDR notation allows me to utilize shorthand notation for specifying a range
> of IP's
>
> In those two cases any ip within 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is allowed
> while anything else residing between 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255 is denied
>
> The problem is I can perform operations on CIDR ranges such as the
> following:
> 192.168.0.0/24
> 192.168.1.0/16
> 10.0.0.0/24
>
> But cannot use the traditional 0.0.0.0/24 because iplong() evaluates 0.0.0.0
> as false thereby invalidating a valid CIDR notation when evaluated as
>
> (ip2long($ip) || (~ip2long($mask))) + 1;
>
> From my own tests only 0.0.0.0/24 fails or as shown in the example code
> above
>
> (ip2long(0.0.0.0) || (~ip2long(24))) + 1;
>
> The class I am using to test with can be found at
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.ip2long.php#108812
>
First of all, as I suggested earlier, the class uses the single |,
which means bitwise OR, you're using ||, boolean OR.
Second, the class you're referring to is wrong. Using ip2long on 24 is
just not valid, you probably want to call ip2long('255.255.255.0')
instead, though it is probably easier to convert the 24 to the long
value.
- Matijn
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] zend_auto_global_disable_jit missing in PHP 5.4.5
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:30 PM, freeone3000 wrote: > I'm working with a third-party PHP extension that makes a call to > zend_auto_global_disable_jit. However, in PHP5.4.5, there is no > zend_auto_global_disable_jit available, nor is it in its traditional > header. Commenting out all zend_auto_global_disable_jit calls causes > PHP to no longer recognize it as a valid extension, while leaving them > in attempts for an invalid method to be called. > > The file in question is > https://github.com/mtorromeo/runkit/blob/master/runkit.c line 305. As > is relatively obvious, it's not part of a macro, and its removal > should not affect whether the library is a PHP extension or not - > perhaps it's based on PHP's static analysis? If it doesn't call the > function, it would access a global, possibly before the global has > been JIT initialized by the runtime. If this is the case, what is the > replacement function for PHP 5.4.5? This is something you're going to want to ask on the Internals list (CC'd). General is more for questions on using the language. -- Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] zend_auto_global_disable_jit missing in PHP 5.4.5
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:39 AM, freeone3000 wrote: > I'm working with a third-party PHP extension that makes a call to > zend_auto_global_disable_jit. However, in PHP5.4.5, there is no > zend_auto_global_disable_jit available, nor is it in its traditional > header. Commenting out all zend_auto_global_disable_jit calls causes > PHP to no longer recognize it as a valid extension, while leaving them > in attempts for an invalid method to be called. > > The file in question is > https://github.com/mtorromeo/runkit/blob/master/runkit.c line 305. As > is relatively obvious, it's not part of a macro, and its removal > should not affect whether the library is a PHP extension or not - > perhaps it's based on PHP's static analysis? If it doesn't call the > function, it would access a global, possibly before the global has > been JIT initialized by the runtime. If this is the case, what is the > replacement function for PHP 5.4.5? > > -- > James Moore > There's a bug report about it at [1], though there's no solution there. - Matijn [1] https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61189 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] disabled cookies
On Jun 3, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote: > > There is a new law been passed in the UK that makes non-essential cookies > opt-in only, so you must get permission in order to use them. What's a non-essential cookie? Cheers, tedd _ tedd.sperl...@gmail.com http://sperling.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] disabled cookies
On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote: > > Yeah, it's been such a pain, as nobody over here is quite sure how the > hell it'll be enforced either, or if it even will be. It's also pretty > vague as to just where the line gets drawn. The official government > sites on this are pretty black and white, but don't clearly address the > grey areas. I think this is definitely a case of the persons making the > laws don't understand the technology involved, which sadly seems to be > the case across a lot of tech laws being passed world-wide of late :( > > -- > Thanks, > Ash This is what I put on my site to address the Cookie issue: http://sperling.com/contact.php Do you think it would be enough? Cheers, tedd _ tedd.sperl...@gmail.com http://sperling.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Happy Diamond Jubilee everyone!
On Jun 1, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote: > This is a bit of a shameless plug, but it is a Friday and a pretty > special weekend over here. > > I recently got to work on something a bit fun at work in my spare time > and they liked it so much that it got used internally to celebrate the > jubilee weekend. > > This is the result http://jubilee.themlondon.com > > For those of you interested, the leg-work is done by a bunch of PHP > scripts run in the background via cron, split into 3 tasks: > > > 1. A script goes out and searches Twitter for tweets that mention >the jubilee, one instance per keyword and records those to a DB >to limit the draw on the Twitter API > 2. A second script goes over those tweets and pulls in all the >non-default profile images for each unique user > 3. Lastly, the image is built as 12 separate tiles every half hour, >using PHP and GD to match the average colour of each profile pic >to a spot on the image, and then these are stitched together for >the final image > > Anyway, hope you guys all have a great weekend, more so if you're > unlucky enough to be working over the whole 4 days :-/ > > -- > Thanks, > Ash > http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk > > Just saw it -- far out! Cheers, tedd PS: You Brits have too much free time on your hands. :-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] disabled cookies
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote: > On Jun 3, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote: >> >> There is a new law been passed in the UK that makes non-essential cookies >> opt-in only, so you must get permission in order to use them. > > What's a non-essential cookie? > > Cheers, > > tedd A cookie that can be removed without the site loosing essential functionality. On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote: > On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote: >> >> Yeah, it's been such a pain, as nobody over here is quite sure how the >> hell it'll be enforced either, or if it even will be. It's also pretty >> vague as to just where the line gets drawn. The official government >> sites on this are pretty black and white, but don't clearly address the >> grey areas. I think this is definitely a case of the persons making the >> laws don't understand the technology involved, which sadly seems to be >> the case across a lot of tech laws being passed world-wide of late :( >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Ash > > This is what I put on my site to address the Cookie issue: > > http://sperling.com/contact.php > > Do you think it would be enough? > > Cheers, > > tedd > If the cookie is non-essential, you also need an option to 'opt-out'. - Matijn -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Read dynamic variable from HTML form into PHP
Hi All, I am a basic user of PHP and I have need of reading the dynamic HTML form field as a variable in PHP so it will be great if someone can share some good link or snip for quick understanding. Thanks, Devang
Re: [PHP] Read dynamic variable from HTML form into PHP
> Hi All, > > I am a basic user of PHP and I have need of reading the dynamic HTML form > field as a variable in PHP so it will be great if someone can share some > good link or snip for quick understanding. > > Thanks, > Devang http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+to+pass+and+receive+a+PHP+variable When just starting out, "Google is your friend". Or did I misunderstand your question? -Govinda -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Read dynamic variable from HTML form into PHP
On 2012-06-05, at 10:54 PM, Devangnp wrote: > I know how to pass variable but having difficulties when I use the dynamic > form field in HTML that add more boxes as per user require. > >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am a basic user of PHP and I have need of reading the dynamic HTML form >>> field as a variable in PHP so it will be great if someone can share some >>> good link or snip for quick understanding. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Devang >> >> >> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+to+pass+and+receive+a+PHP+variable >> >> When just starting out, "Google is your friend". >> >> Or did I misunderstand your question? >> >> -Govinda Devang, Please keep replies on-list. Please post your replies at the bottom, past the older (snipped) content. Many here will be glad to help.. but you'll need to make your question more clear.. at least for me to be able to help anyway. First of all, what do you mean exactly, by, "the dynamic form field in HTML"? And by "boxes" do you mean form inputs of 'text' type? If so, then do you mean to suggest that input by the end user should determine the number of text inputs that should display in a second HTML form? Please spend more time describing what you are trying to do.. and also please show any code you attempt(ed) to accomplish this. If you are unable to write any code, then try pseudo code - meaning write in successive lines of prose what you want code to do, and post that here. -Govinda -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Read dynamic variable from HTML form into PHP
"Govinda" wrote in message news:72497398-3a6c-4faa-89f2-565c18fd2...@gmail.com... On 2012-06-05, at 10:54 PM, Devangnp wrote: > I know how to pass variable but having difficulties when I use the dynamic > form field in HTML that add more boxes as per user require. > >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am a basic user of PHP and I have need of reading the dynamic HTML >>> form >>> field as a variable in PHP so it will be great if someone can share some >>> good link or snip for quick understanding. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Devang >> >> >> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+to+pass+and+receive+a+PHP+variable >> >> When just starting out, "Google is your friend". >> >> Or did I misunderstand your question? >> >> -Govinda Devang, Please keep replies on-list. Please post your replies at the bottom, past the older (snipped) content. Many here will be glad to help.. but you'll need to make your question more clear.. at least for me to be able to help anyway. First of all, what do you mean exactly, by, "the dynamic form field in HTML"? And by "boxes" do you mean form inputs of 'text' type? If so, then do you mean to suggest that input by the end user should determine the number of text inputs that should display in a second HTML form? Please spend more time describing what you are trying to do.. and also please show any code you attempt(ed) to accomplish this. If you are unable to write any code, then try pseudo code - meaning write in successive lines of prose what you want code to do, and post that here. -Govinda= I thought he meant previously generated "array" type fields, that use the same name. I've never done it myself, but I thought the method of handling this kind of input included placing a hidden field with the count on the form to be retriieved later and used in processing the dynamic fields in a loop. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
