Re: [PHP] Integers
It would also mean that 7 (8 digits which includes 0) is the highest numeric representation that you can have or go up to in an octal representation. So to take your example and represent an octal number : 00100010 (subscript 2) = 1057(subscript 8) --Shreyas On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Stephen wrote: > On 10-06-30 10:02 PM, David McGlone wrote: > >> Hi again >> >> I'm trying to learn about octal numbers and I don't understand this: >> >> Binary: 00100010 >> breakdown: (001)= 1 (000)= 0 (101)=5 (111)=7 >> >> I know it's similar to unix permissions, but I'm not understanding where >> for >> example: 111 = 7 >> >> > In base 10, which you use every day, we go > 0 > 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5 > 6 > 7 > 8 > 9 > 10 > > The number 10 is the number of distinct digits we use. > > In binary we only us two, 0 and 1, so 10 is 2 decimal > > So we go > > 0 = 0 decimal > 1 = 1 << important > 10 = 2 << important > 11 = 3 > 100 = 4 << important > 101 = 5 > 110 = 6 > 111 = 7 > > So binary 111 is 4 + 2 + 1 = 7 > > Stephen > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Regards, Shreyas Agasthya
Re: [PHP] Re: Regular Expression to get the whole Comma Separated String in Array Key
On 1 July 2010 06:47, Gaurav Kumar wrote:
> Hey Richard,
>
> Thanks!!! You have resolved my problem..
>
> GK
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Gaurav Kumar
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Need help in resolving the below problem-
>>
>>
>> I would like to get the whole comma separated string into an array value-
>>
>> 1. $postText = "chapters 5, 6, 7, 8";
>> OR
>> 2. $postText = "chapters 5, 6;
>> OR
>> 3. $postText = "chapters 5, 6, 7";
>>
>> What i have done so far is-
>> preg_match('/chapter[s]*[ ]*(\d+, \d+, \d+)/i', $postText, $matches);
>>
>> The above will exactly match the third value $postText = "chapters 5, 6,
>> 7";
>>
>> By Above $matches will contain a value of : $matches[1] = '5, 6, 7';
>>
>> Now i need a SINGLE regular expression which can match first, second
>> variable above or any number of comma separated string and IMPORTANTLY
>> provide me that whole comma separated sting value (as above) in single array
>> key element like below-
>>
>> $matches[1] = '5, 6, 7';
>> OR
>> $matches[1] = '5, 6';
>> OR
>> $matches[1] = '5, 6, 7, 8, 9';
>>
>>
>> Also I have to use regular expression only as the flow of the code does not
>> permit to use any other method to get comma separated string from the
>> master/base string.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gaurav Kumar
>>
>>
>>
>
No problem.
If you are on Windows, then the RegexBuddy application from JGSoft is
pretty good. It allows you to build regex in a step by step way with a
full description of what the regex will do, along with testing and
code snippets. Also has a lot of examples to work from and a built in
support forum.
BTW. I'm not connected to JGSoft. Just a happy licensee.
Richard.
--
-
Richard Quadling
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
EE : http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_248814.html
EE4Free : http://www.experts-exchange.com/becomeAnExpert.jsp
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
ZOPA : http://uk.zopa.com/member/RQuadling
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
From: Adam Richardson
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:16 PM, David Mehler
wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I've got a php form processing question. I've got a text field like
so:
>>
>>
>> Name*:
>>
>>
>>
>> My question is what is the purpose of the id field? I know the name
>> field is what php references, but am not sure what id is for?
>
> Sometimes it's helpful to target a specific element for stylistic or
> functional purposes, and that's when you'll find an id attribute
helpful.
>
> In your example above, label elements use the id in the 'for'
attribute
> (and, speaking to your example, you should have for="name" instead of
> for="txtname"):
> http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp
>
> In terms of CSS, you can specifically reference the element by it's id
using
> the notation tag_name#id_value, and id's have the highest order of
> specificity (i.e., if you try and style an element by tag name, class,
> and/or id, the id styles are what will take precedent, all other
things
> equal.)
> http://webdesign.about.com/od/cssselectors/qt/cssselid.htm
> http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_specificity_wars.html
>
> In terms of javascript, you can reference the element by it's id by
using
> the function getElementById('id_value):
> http://www.tizag.com/javascriptT/javascript-getelementbyid.php
>
> Just remember that a particular id can only occur once on a page
(another
> difference between the name attributes in a form, as you could have
multiple
> forms on a page and each form could have an input with a "zip" name
without
> issue, but that same page could only have one id with the value
"zip".)
>
> That all said, with the advent of javascript data attributes, you'll
have
> one more way to target elements for design and functionality:
> http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/
If you look at the current HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 specification, you
will find 'name' is no longer listed as a standard attribute. It is all
but obsolete and has been replaced by 'id' almost everywhere. They
actually recommend you put both attributes into tags with identical
values until your applications can be updated to drop all uses of the
name attribute.
Bob McConnell
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
On 1 July 2010 14:38, Bob McConnell wrote:
> From: Adam Richardson
>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:16 PM, David Mehler
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I've got a php form processing question. I've got a text field like
> so:
>>>
>>>
>>> Name*:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My question is what is the purpose of the id field? I know the name
>>> field is what php references, but am not sure what id is for?
>>
>> Sometimes it's helpful to target a specific element for stylistic or
>> functional purposes, and that's when you'll find an id attribute
> helpful.
>>
>> In your example above, label elements use the id in the 'for'
> attribute
>> (and, speaking to your example, you should have for="name" instead of
>> for="txtname"):
>> http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp
>>
>> In terms of CSS, you can specifically reference the element by it's id
> using
>> the notation tag_name#id_value, and id's have the highest order of
>> specificity (i.e., if you try and style an element by tag name, class,
>> and/or id, the id styles are what will take precedent, all other
> things
>> equal.)
>> http://webdesign.about.com/od/cssselectors/qt/cssselid.htm
>> http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_specificity_wars.html
>>
>> In terms of javascript, you can reference the element by it's id by
> using
>> the function getElementById('id_value):
>> http://www.tizag.com/javascriptT/javascript-getelementbyid.php
>>
>> Just remember that a particular id can only occur once on a page
> (another
>> difference between the name attributes in a form, as you could have
> multiple
>> forms on a page and each form could have an input with a "zip" name
> without
>> issue, but that same page could only have one id with the value
> "zip".)
>>
>> That all said, with the advent of javascript data attributes, you'll
> have
>> one more way to target elements for design and functionality:
>> http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/
>
> If you look at the current HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 specification, you
> will find 'name' is no longer listed as a standard attribute. It is all
> but obsolete and has been replaced by 'id' almost everywhere. They
> actually recommend you put both attributes into tags with identical
> values until your applications can be updated to drop all uses of the
> name attribute.
>
>
>
Errr, what? Name is by no means obsolete for forms. Have a look at
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#attr-fe-name
- it's still in the html5 spec and there's little to no chance of it
going away any time soon.
Relying on w3schools is not ... really advisable.
Regards
Peter
--
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
From: Peter Lind
> On 1 July 2010 14:38, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> From: Adam Richardson
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:16 PM, David Mehler
>> wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I've got a php form processing question. I've got a text field like
>> so:
Name*:
My question is what is the purpose of the id field? I know the name
field is what php references, but am not sure what id is for?
>>>
>>> Sometimes it's helpful to target a specific element for stylistic or
>>> functional purposes, and that's when you'll find an id attribute
>> helpful.
>>>
>>> In your example above, label elements use the id in the 'for'
>> attribute
>>> (and, speaking to your example, you should have for="name" instead
of
>>> for="txtname"):
>>> http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp
>>>
>>> In terms of CSS, you can specifically reference the element by it's
id
>> using
>>> the notation tag_name#id_value, and id's have the highest order of
>>> specificity (i.e., if you try and style an element by tag name,
class,
>>> and/or id, the id styles are what will take precedent, all other
>> things
>>> equal.)
>>> http://webdesign.about.com/od/cssselectors/qt/cssselid.htm
>>> http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_specificity_wars.html
>>>
>>> In terms of javascript, you can reference the element by it's id by
>> using
>>> the function getElementById('id_value):
>>> http://www.tizag.com/javascriptT/javascript-getelementbyid.php
>>>
>>> Just remember that a particular id can only occur once on a page
>> (another
>>> difference between the name attributes in a form, as you could have
>> multiple
>>> forms on a page and each form could have an input with a "zip" name
>> without
>>> issue, but that same page could only have one id with the value
>> "zip".)
>>>
>>> That all said, with the advent of javascript data attributes, you'll
>> have
>>> one more way to target elements for design and functionality:
>>> http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/
>>
>> If you look at the current HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 specification, you
>> will find 'name' is no longer listed as a standard attribute. It is
all
>> but obsolete and has been replaced by 'id' almost everywhere. They
>> actually recommend you put both attributes into tags with identical
>> values until your applications can be updated to drop all uses of the
>> name attribute.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Errr, what? Name is by no means obsolete for forms. Have a look at
>
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#attr
-fe-name
> - it's still in the html5 spec and there's little to no chance of it
> going away any time soon.
HTML5 is years away from completion and still changes far too often, so
we don't consider it nearly ready for prime time. XHTML is here now, has
several usable validation suites and has been stable for years. That's
more of a reasonable target for commercial products.
> Relying on w3schools is not ... really advisable.
Where else would you go? Even W3C doesn't publish decent reference
documents, and their specifications are inscrutable to normal human
beings.
Bob McConnell
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] mail() + localhost
PHP'ers, I am sure this would have been asked a zillion times but I take this as my turn to get some help. I hate to ask such rhetorical questions but quite couldn't understand how to tweak this. All I am trying to do is send a mail from my localhost to my Gmail ID. I read stuff about how the SMTP port should be accessible; should be open et al. My set-up is very simple: 1. Using Easy PHP. 2. Windows XP Also, when the comment says that you need to 'configure' your php.ini, which .ini should I modify? The reason being, I see that file in two locations, apparently. (i) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\apache (ii) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\conf_files *My php.ini (will remove the semi-colon)* * * ; For Win32 only. ;SMTP = localhost ;smtp_port = 25 ; For Win32 only. ;sendmail_from = m...@example.com *My code: * * * * * * * Regards, *Shreyas Agasthya
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Shreyas Agasthya wrote: > Also, when the comment says that you need to 'configure' your php.ini, which > .ini should I modify? The reason being, I see that file in two locations, > apparently. > (i) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\apache > (ii) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\conf_files Call this in a script running under your web server: http://www.php.net/phpinfo Alternatively, you could also look at these: http://www.php.net/php-ini-loaded-file http://www.php.net/php-ini-scanned-files Andrew -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
On 1 July 2010 15:02, Bob McConnell wrote:
> From: Peter Lind
>
>> On 1 July 2010 14:38, Bob McConnell wrote:
>>> From: Adam Richardson
>>>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:16 PM, David Mehler
>
>>> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a php form processing question. I've got a text field like
>>> so:
>
>
> Name*:
>
>
>
> My question is what is the purpose of the id field? I know the name
> field is what php references, but am not sure what id is for?
Sometimes it's helpful to target a specific element for stylistic or
functional purposes, and that's when you'll find an id attribute
>>> helpful.
In your example above, label elements use the id in the 'for'
>>> attribute
(and, speaking to your example, you should have for="name" instead
> of
for="txtname"):
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp
In terms of CSS, you can specifically reference the element by it's
> id
>>> using
the notation tag_name#id_value, and id's have the highest order of
specificity (i.e., if you try and style an element by tag name,
> class,
and/or id, the id styles are what will take precedent, all other
>>> things
equal.)
http://webdesign.about.com/od/cssselectors/qt/cssselid.htm
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_specificity_wars.html
In terms of javascript, you can reference the element by it's id by
>>> using
the function getElementById('id_value):
http://www.tizag.com/javascriptT/javascript-getelementbyid.php
Just remember that a particular id can only occur once on a page
>>> (another
difference between the name attributes in a form, as you could have
>>> multiple
forms on a page and each form could have an input with a "zip" name
>>> without
issue, but that same page could only have one id with the value
>>> "zip".)
That all said, with the advent of javascript data attributes, you'll
>>> have
one more way to target elements for design and functionality:
http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/
>>>
>>> If you look at the current HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 specification, you
>>> will find 'name' is no longer listed as a standard attribute. It is
> all
>>> but obsolete and has been replaced by 'id' almost everywhere. They
>>> actually recommend you put both attributes into tags with identical
>>> values until your applications can be updated to drop all uses of the
>>> name attribute.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Errr, what? Name is by no means obsolete for forms. Have a look at
>>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#attr
> -fe-name
>> - it's still in the html5 spec and there's little to no chance of it
>> going away any time soon.
>
> HTML5 is years away from completion and still changes far too often, so
> we don't consider it nearly ready for prime time. XHTML is here now, has
> several usable validation suites and has been stable for years. That's
> more of a reasonable target for commercial products.
>
>> Relying on w3schools is not ... really advisable.
>
> Where else would you go? Even W3C doesn't publish decent reference
> documents, and their specifications are inscrutable to normal human
> beings.
>
> Bob McConnell
>
--
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 09:09, Shreyas Agasthya wrote: > > All I am trying to do is send a mail from my localhost to my Gmail ID. I > read stuff about how the SMTP port should be accessible; should be open et > al. My set-up is very simple: > > 1. Using Easy PHP. > 2. Windows XP 3.) An SMTP server, I hope...? > Also, when the comment says that you need to 'configure' your php.ini, which > .ini should I modify? The reason being, I see that file in two locations, > apparently. > (i) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\apache > (ii) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\conf_files In a browser, check the output of phpinfo() - specifically, the value for "Loaded Configuration File" - and modify that, as the other may be for the PHP CLI, another installed component using a local override, or may not even be used at all. > *My php.ini (will remove the semi-colon)* > * > * > ; For Win32 only. > ;SMTP = localhost > ;smtp_port = 25 Uncomment the two lines above. > ; For Win32 only. > ;sendmail_from = m...@example.com You don't *need* to uncomment and set the `sendmail_from` option, as long as you set an explicit `From` header in your code. More on that after your snippet. > *My code: * > * > * > * > * > > $from= "shreya...@gmail.com"; > $to ="shreya...@gmail.com"; > $subject = "PHP Testing"; > $message = "Test Me"; > mail ($to,$subject,$message,'From:'.$from); > ?> Your code should be modified just a bit for better conformance and portability, but I understand that you're just using it as a test. After following the suggestions above (and remembering to restart Apache, of course), try this: -- UNADVERTISED DEDICATED SERVER SPECIALS SAME-DAY SETUP Just ask me what we're offering today! daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] how to use HTML Symbol Entities with mail() ?
Hi List, I am working on generated emails, using the mail() function. Works fine, but when including characters like ∧ (= ∧) or ∨ (= ∨) in the message, these characters are displayed as ? in the emails. Snippet: $headers = 'MIME-Version: 1.0' . "\r\n"; $headers .= 'Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1' . "\r\n"; ... $bool = mail ($mailto, $subject, $body, $headers); also tested with: $headers .= 'Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8' . "\r\n"; but without result. Any ideas ? TIA, Cor
Re: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
On 1 July 2010 15:28, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 1 July 2010 15:02, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> From: Peter Lind
>>
>>> On 1 July 2010 14:38, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Adam Richardson
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:16 PM, David Mehler
>>
wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I've got a php form processing question. I've got a text field like
so:
>>
>>
>> Name*:
>>
>>
>>
>> My question is what is the purpose of the id field? I know the name
>> field is what php references, but am not sure what id is for?
>
> Sometimes it's helpful to target a specific element for stylistic or
> functional purposes, and that's when you'll find an id attribute
helpful.
>
> In your example above, label elements use the id in the 'for'
attribute
> (and, speaking to your example, you should have for="name" instead
>> of
> for="txtname"):
> http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp
>
> In terms of CSS, you can specifically reference the element by it's
>> id
using
> the notation tag_name#id_value, and id's have the highest order of
> specificity (i.e., if you try and style an element by tag name,
>> class,
> and/or id, the id styles are what will take precedent, all other
things
> equal.)
> http://webdesign.about.com/od/cssselectors/qt/cssselid.htm
> http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_specificity_wars.html
>
> In terms of javascript, you can reference the element by it's id by
using
> the function getElementById('id_value):
> http://www.tizag.com/javascriptT/javascript-getelementbyid.php
>
> Just remember that a particular id can only occur once on a page
(another
> difference between the name attributes in a form, as you could have
multiple
> forms on a page and each form could have an input with a "zip" name
without
> issue, but that same page could only have one id with the value
"zip".)
>
> That all said, with the advent of javascript data attributes, you'll
have
> one more way to target elements for design and functionality:
> http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/
If you look at the current HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 specification, you
will find 'name' is no longer listed as a standard attribute. It is
>> all
but obsolete and has been replaced by 'id' almost everywhere. They
actually recommend you put both attributes into tags with identical
values until your applications can be updated to drop all uses of the
name attribute.
>>>
>>> Errr, what? Name is by no means obsolete for forms. Have a look at
>>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#attr
>> -fe-name
>>> - it's still in the html5 spec and there's little to no chance of it
>>> going away any time soon.
>>
>> HTML5 is years away from completion and still changes far too often, so
>> we don't consider it nearly ready for prime time. XHTML is here now, has
>> several usable validation suites and has been stable for years. That's
>> more of a reasonable target for commercial products.
>>
>>> Relying on w3schools is not ... really advisable.
>>
>> Where else would you go? Even W3C doesn't publish decent reference
>> documents, and their specifications are inscrutable to normal human
>> beings.
>>
>> Bob McConnell
>>
Sorry about the empty mail, a mistake.
Apart from that, html5 is not going to do away with the name
attribute. And name is in xhtml1 and html4.01 and there's no mention
of it being obsolete, deprecated or in any other fashion on the way
out.
As far as reference: the source.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/dtds.html#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Strict very
clearly specifies that name is still a very valid attribute.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4 shows the same
in a slightly more readable format - the only mentions of anything
deprecated (there are no references to anything obsolete) are for the
isindex element and the align attribute of the legend element.
What is the case regarding the name attribute is that it's been
deprecated for a few elements (such as a, form, frame, img) in XHTML1
and will be removed in XHTML2 (which we'll likely never see used in
browsers). See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.10
Regards
Peter
--
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
Erm... understood.
I modified the changes to look like this in the "php.ini" file (the right
one based on the output of phpinfo()).
3)
*smtp = smtp.gmail.com*
*smtp_port = 587*
*
*
*I get : "Failed to connect to mailserver at "localhost" port 587, verify
your "SMTP" and "smtp_port" setting in php.ini"*
*
*
Regards,
Shreyas
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 09:09, Shreyas Agasthya
> wrote:
> >
> > All I am trying to do is send a mail from my localhost to my Gmail ID. I
> > read stuff about how the SMTP port should be accessible; should be open
> et
> > al. My set-up is very simple:
> >
> > 1. Using Easy PHP.
> > 2. Windows XP
>
> 3.) An SMTP server, I hope...?
>
> > Also, when the comment says that you need to 'configure' your php.ini,
> which
> > .ini should I modify? The reason being, I see that file in two locations,
> > apparently.
> > (i) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\apache
> > (ii) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\conf_files
>
> In a browser, check the output of phpinfo() - specifically, the
> value for "Loaded Configuration File" - and modify that, as the other
> may be for the PHP CLI, another installed component using a local
> override, or may not even be used at all.
>
> > *My php.ini (will remove the semi-colon)*
> > *
> > *
> > ; For Win32 only.
> > ;SMTP = localhost
> > ;smtp_port = 25
>
> Uncomment the two lines above.
>
> > ; For Win32 only.
> > ;sendmail_from = m...@example.com
>
> You don't *need* to uncomment and set the `sendmail_from` option,
> as long as you set an explicit `From` header in your code. More on
> that after your snippet.
>
> > *My code: *
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > > *
> >
> > $from= "shreya...@gmail.com";
> > $to ="shreya...@gmail.com";
> > $subject = "PHP Testing";
> > $message = "Test Me";
> > mail ($to,$subject,$message,'From:'.$from);
> > ?>
>
> Your code should be modified just a bit for better conformance and
> portability, but I understand that you're just using it as a test.
> After following the suggestions above (and remembering to restart
> Apache, of course), try this:
>
>
> $from = "sherya...@gmail.com";
>
> // Gmail allows (\+[a-z0-9\.\-_]+) appended to your username to
> filter emails in your Gmail box.
> $to = "shreyasbr+phpt...@gmail.com ";
>
> // This will append (at the moment, my local time) 1 Jul 2010, 09:27:23
> $subject = "PHP Testing ".date("j M Y, H:i:s");
>
> $message = "Test Me.";
>
> // Create your headers, remembering to terminate each line with CRLF
> (\r\n) to comply with RFC [2]821.
> $headers = "From: ".$from."\r\n";
> $headers .= "X-Mailer: PHP/".phpversion()."\r\n";
>
> // Send it, or inform us of an error. No need to use a -f flag here.
> if (!mail($to,$subject,$body,$headers)) {
>echo "Ah, crap. Something's SNAFU'd here.";
>exit(-1);
> }
> ?>
>
> --
>
> UNADVERTISED DEDICATED SERVER SPECIALS
> SAME-DAY SETUP
> Just ask me what we're offering today!
> daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
> http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
>
--
Regards,
Shreyas Agasthya
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
Spoke too fast.
Fixed that (SMTP has to be uppercase)
Now it is : *SMTP server response: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command
first. c15sm7128213rvi.11*
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Shreyas Agasthya wrote:
> Erm... understood.
>
> I modified the changes to look like this in the "php.ini" file (the right
> one based on the output of phpinfo()).
>
> 3)
> *smtp = smtp.gmail.com*
> *smtp_port = 587*
> *
> *
> *I get : "Failed to connect to mailserver at "localhost" port 587, verify
> your "SMTP" and "smtp_port" setting in php.ini"*
> *
> *
> Regards,
> Shreyas
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 09:09, Shreyas Agasthya
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > All I am trying to do is send a mail from my localhost to my Gmail ID. I
>> > read stuff about how the SMTP port should be accessible; should be open
>> et
>> > al. My set-up is very simple:
>> >
>> > 1. Using Easy PHP.
>> > 2. Windows XP
>>
>> 3.) An SMTP server, I hope...?
>>
>> > Also, when the comment says that you need to 'configure' your php.ini,
>> which
>> > .ini should I modify? The reason being, I see that file in two
>> locations,
>> > apparently.
>> > (i) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\apache
>> > (ii) C:\Program Files\EasyPHP 3.0\conf_files
>>
>> In a browser, check the output of phpinfo() - specifically, the
>> value for "Loaded Configuration File" - and modify that, as the other
>> may be for the PHP CLI, another installed component using a local
>> override, or may not even be used at all.
>>
>> > *My php.ini (will remove the semi-colon)*
>> > *
>> > *
>> > ; For Win32 only.
>> > ;SMTP = localhost
>> > ;smtp_port = 25
>>
>> Uncomment the two lines above.
>>
>> > ; For Win32 only.
>> > ;sendmail_from = m...@example.com
>>
>> You don't *need* to uncomment and set the `sendmail_from` option,
>> as long as you set an explicit `From` header in your code. More on
>> that after your snippet.
>>
>> > *My code: *
>> > *
>> > *
>> > *
>> > > > *
>> >
>> > $from= "shreya...@gmail.com";
>> > $to ="shreya...@gmail.com";
>> > $subject = "PHP Testing";
>> > $message = "Test Me";
>> > mail ($to,$subject,$message,'From:'.$from);
>> > ?>
>>
>> Your code should be modified just a bit for better conformance and
>> portability, but I understand that you're just using it as a test.
>> After following the suggestions above (and remembering to restart
>> Apache, of course), try this:
>>
>> >
>> $from = "sherya...@gmail.com";
>>
>> // Gmail allows (\+[a-z0-9\.\-_]+) appended to your username to
>> filter emails in your Gmail box.
>> $to = "shreyasbr+phpt...@gmail.com ";
>>
>> // This will append (at the moment, my local time) 1 Jul 2010, 09:27:23
>> $subject = "PHP Testing ".date("j M Y, H:i:s");
>>
>> $message = "Test Me.";
>>
>> // Create your headers, remembering to terminate each line with CRLF
>> (\r\n) to comply with RFC [2]821.
>> $headers = "From: ".$from."\r\n";
>> $headers .= "X-Mailer: PHP/".phpversion()."\r\n";
>>
>> // Send it, or inform us of an error. No need to use a -f flag here.
>> if (!mail($to,$subject,$body,$headers)) {
>>echo "Ah, crap. Something's SNAFU'd here.";
>>exit(-1);
>> }
>> ?>
>>
>> --
>>
>> UNADVERTISED DEDICATED SERVER SPECIALS
>> SAME-DAY SETUP
>> Just ask me what we're offering today!
>> daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
>> http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shreyas Agasthya
>
--
Regards,
Shreyas Agasthya
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:02, Shreyas Agasthya wrote: > Spoke too fast. > > Fixed that (SMTP has to be uppercase) > > Now it is : *SMTP server response: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command > first. c15sm7128213rvi.11* (Quick note: per the list guidelines, please don't top-post in threads.) That error message is because you're trying to connect to an SMTPS (secure, SSL-encrypted SMTP) server using plain text, which won't work. If you have a plain SMTP server running, try that to get one thing resolved at a time. Change the port to 25 in your php.ini (and, again, restart Apache) if plain SMTP is available on the default port. -- UNADVERTISED DEDICATED SERVER SPECIALS SAME-DAY SETUP Just ask me what we're offering today! daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:40:56PM +0200, Peter Lind wrote: > Apart from that, html5 is not going to do away with the name > attribute. And name is in xhtml1 and html4.01 and there's no mention > of it being obsolete, deprecated or in any other fashion on the way > out. > > As far as reference: the source. > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/dtds.html#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Strict very > clearly specifies that name is still a very valid attribute. > http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4 shows the same > in a slightly more readable format - the only mentions of anything > deprecated (there are no references to anything obsolete) are for the > isindex element and the align attribute of the legend element. > > What is the case regarding the name attribute is that it's been > deprecated for a few elements (such as a, form, frame, img) in XHTML1 > and will be removed in XHTML2 (which we'll likely never see used in > browsers). See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.10 All this is fortunate, since I don't think PHP is even aware of the ID attribute. Imagine trying to process form fields without the "name" attribute being present. Paul -- Paul M. Foster -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
Not sure where I am top-posting. I posted to my own mail so that one gets to know the latest. Nevertheless, I wouldn't go against the guidelines as I completely understand the havoc that it can create. The port is 587 as per Google; SMTP that I am using is Google's (anything wrong here?). If there is a rudimentary mistake that I am doing, please guide me. Regards, Shreyas On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:02, Shreyas Agasthya > wrote: > > Spoke too fast. > > > > Fixed that (SMTP has to be uppercase) > > > > Now it is : *SMTP server response: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS > command > > first. c15sm7128213rvi.11* > >(Quick note: per the list guidelines, please don't top-post in threads.) > >That error message is because you're trying to connect to an SMTPS > (secure, SSL-encrypted SMTP) server using plain text, which won't > work. If you have a plain SMTP server running, try that to get one > thing resolved at a time. Change the port to 25 in your php.ini (and, > again, restart Apache) if plain SMTP is available on the default port. > > -- > > UNADVERTISED DEDICATED SERVER SPECIALS > SAME-DAY SETUP > Just ask me what we're offering today! > daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net > http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ > -- Regards, Shreyas Agasthya
Re: [PHP] Integers
At 10:02 PM -0400 6/30/10, David McGlone wrote: Hi again I'm trying to learn about octal numbers and I don't understand this: Binary: 00100010 breakdown: (001)= 1 (000)= 0 (101)=5 (111)=7 I know it's similar to unix permissions, but I'm not understanding where for example: 111 = 7 wikipedia has got me all confused. -- Blessings, David M. David: You're mixing things (Octal/Permissions)-- let's deal with Octal first. All number systems have a defined base for the power of their placeholder. Our Decimal system is based upon tens. More explicitly -- each placeholder in the Decimal system is dependant on a power of ten. For example, the number 559 (DEC) is simply: (5 x 10^2) + (5 x 10^1) + (9 x 10^0) That's 5 times 10 to the power of two, plus 5 times 10 to the power of 1, plus 9 times ten to the power of zero (which is always 1). The sum of the products is 559. I won't go into the reasons why we want to convert numbers between bases, but there are reasons. The beauty of Octal (base 8) is it is much easier to convert from Binary than it is to convert Binary to Decimal. Additionally, it's simpler to convert Octal to Decimal than it is to convert Binary to Decimal, Lastly, it is much easier to take the conversion from Binary to Octal and then convert from Octal to Decimal in a two step process than it is to it all at once by converting Binary to Decimal. That's the main reason why we use Octal. For example: If you take the Binary number: 00100010 (BIN) and translate that to Octal, you have: 1057 (OCT) How did I do that? That is (as you said above) a very easy process -- you just break it up into groups of three. (100) = 1, (000) = 0, (101) = 5, (111) = 7 But what you are actually doing is: 1 x 10^3 (OCT) + 0 x 10^2 (OCT) + 5 x 10^1 (OCT) + 7 x 1 x 10^0( OCT) -- side note -- Why is 111 = 7? It's because: 1 x 10^2 = 4 1 x 10^1 = 2 1 x 10^0 = 1 Total 7 -- Interestingly enough it's 7 in both Octal and Decimal (and anything greater than base 8). -- end of side note --- But realize the number 10 in Octal is 8 in Decimal. As such, I can convert Octal to Decimal pretty easily by: 1 x 8^3 = 512 0 x 8^2 = 0 5 x 8^1 = 40 7 x 8^0 = 7 559 (DEC) Please note 4 computations. Whereas, if I tried to convert Binary (base 2) directly to Decimal (based 10) it would go like this: 0010 0010 (BIN) 1 x 10^9 = 512 0 x 10^8 = 0 0 x 10^7 = 0 0 x 10^6 = 0 1 x 10^5 = 32 0 x 10^4 = 0 1 x 10^3 = 8 1 x 10^2 = 4 1 x 10^1 = 2 1 x 10^0 = 1 Total: 559 Please note 10 computations! As you can see above, it is *much* easier to take a Binary number and break it into Octal portions by simply looking at the pairs of three, namely: (100) = 1, (000) = 0, (101) = 5, (111) = 7 And from that run the Octal to Decimal conversion. === Now permissions === Permissions are set to the power of 8 (Octal). Why? Because we don't need a higher base number system to cover the needs of setting permissions. It is defined as: read (r) = 4 write (w) = 2 execute (x) = 1 So, the numbers mean: 7 = rwx (read write execute) 6 = rw- (read and write) 5 = r-x (read and execute) 4 = r-- (read) 3 = -wx (write and execute) 2 = -w- (write) 1 = --x (execute 0 = --- (no access) The permission system for files/directories is divided into divisions, namely "Owner", "Group", and "ALL". Each division can have their own permission settings. The standard is to list them in order of "Owner", "Group", and "ALL" such as: 777 means that all three divisions have their permission set to read, write, and execute. 755 means that the Owner has permission set to read, write, and execute whereas the "Group", and "ALL" have their permissions set to only read and execute. You often see this displayed as: Owner Group All example --- chmod 777 rwx rwx rwx rwx rwx rwx Owner Group All example --- chmod 755 rwx r-x r-x rwx r-x -r-x Owner Group All example --- chmod 766 rwx rw- rw- rwx rw- rw- Owner Group All example --- chmod 644 rw- r-- r-- rw- r-- -r-- Owner Group All example --- chmod 600 rw- --- --- rw- --- --- There is no magical rule why we use Octal for this. In fact, we could have used any system greater than base 8 -- even base 16 (HEX), but there was no need for more (there is, but I don't want to explain that). I hope this lifts some of the confusion. Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Integers (correction)
Correction I said: 1 x 10^9 = 512 0 x 10^8 = 0 0 x 10^7 = 0 0 x 10^6 = 0 1 x 10^5 = 32 0 x 10^4 = 0 1 x 10^3 = 8 1 x 10^2 = 4 1 x 10^1 = 2 1 x 10^0 = 1 It should have been: 1 x 2^9 = 512 0 x 2^8 = 0 0 x 2^7 = 0 0 x 2^6 = 0 1 x 2^5 = 32 0 x 2^4 = 0 1 x 2^3 = 8 1 x 2^2 = 4 1 x 2^1 = 2 Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP 5 Configuration
I've been trying to install PHP5 with windows XP, but i had received the next errors: - Error trying to access the local web services Get Object failed. You will need manual configure the web server. - Error trying to access mime type file. You will need manual configure the web server. Somebody can help me??? Regards _ Agudiza los sentidos que viene un nuevo Messenger ¿estás listo? http://explore.live.com/windows-live-messenger
Re: [PHP] PHP 5 Configuration
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 19:24 +0100, Gustavo Carrasco wrote: > I've been trying to install PHP5 with windows XP, but i had received the next > errors: > - Error trying to access the local web services Get Object failed. You will > need manual configure the web > > server. > - Error trying to access mime type file. You will need manual configure the > web server. > Somebody can help me??? > Regards > > > > _ > Agudiza los sentidos que viene un nuevo Messenger ¿estás listo? > http://explore.live.com/windows-live-messenger It seems to suggest that you've not installed a web server, such as Apache or IIS. Of the two I'd choose Apache as it's by far the most configurable and secure. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
RE: [PHP] PHP 5 Configuration
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 19:38 +0100, Gustavo Carrasco wrote: > Hi, nice to meet you. > I had installed Apache, and his service is running good. > There's any sequence about how to install this products? or maybe i > need to modify some lines in httpd file or php.ini file? > > > __ > Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP 5 Configuration > From: a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk > To: carrascojg...@hotmail.com > CC: php-general@lists.php.net > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 19:28:30 +0100 > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 19:24 +0100, Gustavo Carrasco wrote: > > I've been trying to install PHP5 with windows XP, but i had received > the next errors: > - Error trying to access the local web services Get Object failed. > You will need manual configure the web > > server. > - Error trying to access mime type file. You will need manual > configure the web server. > Somebody can help me??? > Regards > > > > _ > Agudiza los sentidos que viene un nuevo Messenger ¿estás listo? > http://explore.live.com/windows-live-messenger > > > It seems to suggest that you've not installed a web server, such as > Apache or IIS. Of the two I'd choose Apache as it's by far the most > configurable and secure. > > Thanks, > Ash > http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk > > > > > > __ > Hotmail prepara novedades y sorpresas en breve, ¡estate atento! The php.net download area should have both the .exe install files and instructions about how to get it configured with a web server. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
RE: [PHP] PHP 5 Configuration
Hi, nice to meet you. I had installed Apache, and his service is running good. There's any sequence about how to install this products? or maybe i need to modify some lines in httpd file or php.ini file? Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP 5 Configuration From: a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk To: carrascojg...@hotmail.com CC: php-general@lists.php.net Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 19:28:30 +0100 On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 19:24 +0100, Gustavo Carrasco wrote: I've been trying to install PHP5 with windows XP, but i had received the next errors: - Error trying to access the local web services Get Object failed. You will need manual configure the web server. - Error trying to access mime type file. You will need manual configure the web server. Somebody can help me??? Regards _ Agudiza los sentidos que viene un nuevo Messenger ¿estás listo? http://explore.live.com/windows-live-messenger It seems to suggest that you've not installed a web server, such as Apache or IIS. Of the two I'd choose Apache as it's by far the most configurable and secure. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk _ No has visto nada como el nuevo Messenger, ¡te sorprenderá! http://explore.live.com/windows-live-messenger
[PHP] The script tried to execute a method or access a property of an incomplete object.
Hi, i got this error that i can't figure out.. Maybe you can help;
Notice: mbConfig(): The script tried to execute a method or access a
property of an incomplete object. Please ensure that the class
definition "classCoreDBtable" of the object you are trying to operate
on was loaded _before_ unserialize() gets called or provide a
__autoload() function to load the class definition in
/media/500gb/data2/www/htdocs/work_myown/mediaBeez/php/lib_mediaBeez.php
on line 540
lib_mediaBeez.php:540+;
function mbConfig ($name) {
$value = null;
540:if (class_exists('classCoreDBtable') &&
isset($_SESSION["mb_site_preferences"]) &&
is_array($_SESSION["mb_site_preferences"]->rec)) {
$sp = $_SESSION["mb_site_preferences"];
if (array_key_exists($name, $sp->rec)) $value = $sp->rec[$name];
}
//defaults required?
if (is_null($value)) {
switch ($name) {
case "sp_theme": $value="mediaBeez_default"; break;
case "sp_thumb_width" : $value="95"; break;
case "sp_thumb_height" : $value = "95"; break;
case "sp_midres_width" : $value="800"; break;
case "sp_midres_height" : $value = "600"; break;
case "sp_buttonTheme" : $value="orangeGreenBlue"; break;
case "sp_menu_theme" : $value="whiteBlue"; break;
lib_mediaBeez.php:0;
http://code.google.com/u/rene7705/
http://mediabeez.ws/downloads (and demos)
My music (i'm DJ firesnake)
http://mediabeez.ws/music
http://www.facebook.com/rene7705
-
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: The script tried to execute a method or access a property of an incomplete object.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> Hi, i got this error that i can't figure out.. Maybe you can help;
>
> Notice: mbConfig(): The script tried to execute a method or access a
> property of an incomplete object. Please ensure that the class
> definition "classCoreDBtable" of the object you are trying to operate
> on was loaded _before_ unserialize() gets called or provide a
> __autoload() function to load the class definition in
> /media/500gb/data2/www/htdocs/work_myown/mediaBeez/php/lib_mediaBeez.php
> on line 540
>
I have a partial fix, thanks to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/965611/forcing-access-to-php-incomplete-class-object-properties
function fixObject (&$object)
{
if (!is_object ($object) && gettype ($object) == 'object')
return ($object = unserialize (serialize ($object)));
return $object;
}
I believe this to be a hack, to call this function to fix my objects.
But it gets me going again.
I'm still holding out for more tips though ;)
>
>
> lib_mediaBeez.php:540+;
> function mbConfig ($name) {
>
> $value = null;
>
> 540: if (class_exists('classCoreDBtable') &&
> isset($_SESSION["mb_site_preferences"]) &&
> is_array($_SESSION["mb_site_preferences"]->rec)) {
>
> $sp = $_SESSION["mb_site_preferences"];
>
> if (array_key_exists($name, $sp->rec)) $value =
> $sp->rec[$name];
>
> }
>
>
>
> //defaults required?
>
> if (is_null($value)) {
>
> switch ($name) {
>
> case "sp_theme": $value="mediaBeez_default"; break;
>
> case "sp_thumb_width" : $value="95"; break;
>
> case "sp_thumb_height" : $value = "95"; break;
>
> case "sp_midres_width" : $value="800"; break;
>
> case "sp_midres_height" : $value = "600"; break;
>
>
>
> case "sp_buttonTheme" : $value="orangeGreenBlue"; break;
>
> case "sp_menu_theme" : $value="whiteBlue"; break;
>
>
>
> lib_mediaBeez.php:0;
>
> require_once ("defines_mediaBeez.php");
> require_once ('core_db_table.php');
>
>
>
>
> So i do include the class, yet i get this error.
> Any clues will be much appreciated..
>
>
> --
> -
> Greetings from Rene7705,
>
> My free open source webcomponents:
> http://code.google.com/u/rene7705/
> http://mediabeez.ws/downloads (and demos)
>
> My music (i'm DJ firesnake)
> http://mediabeez.ws/music
>
> http://www.facebook.com/rene7705
> -
>
--
-
Greetings from Rene7705,
My free open source webcomponents:
http://code.google.com/u/rene7705/
http://mediabeez.ws/downloads (and demos)
My music (i'm DJ firesnake)
http://mediabeez.ws/music
http://www.facebook.com/rene7705
-
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] NULL Date Entries...
In one of my forms, I am building a variable that I can use as an
INSERT string.
On my form, I have several DATE fields which exist of 3 fields MM - DD
-
when I build my string it looks like this:
array('dbf'=>'applicant_dob',
'f'=>array('applicant_dob_1','applicant_dob_2','applicant_dob_3'),
'req'=>0, 's'=>'/'),
This enters in the DB fine when there is a DATE, but when these fields
are left empty, it inserts into the the DB as 2069-12-31.
How does one deal with this?
Don Wieland
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] NULL Date Entries...
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:26 -0700, Don Wieland wrote:
> In one of my forms, I am building a variable that I can use as an
> INSERT string.
>
> On my form, I have several DATE fields which exist of 3 fields MM - DD
> -
>
> when I build my string it looks like this:
>
> array('dbf'=>'applicant_dob',
> 'f'=>array('applicant_dob_1','applicant_dob_2','applicant_dob_3'),
> 'req'=>0, 's'=>'/'),
>
> This enters in the DB fine when there is a DATE, but when these fields
> are left empty, it inserts into the the DB as 2069-12-31.
>
> How does one deal with this?
>
> Don Wieland
>
How are you allowing the user to select a date? If it is three form
fields, it might be logical to use select lists with the allowed range
of values in.
If that's not possible, use lines like this to set default values:
$month = (isset($_POST['month']) && preg_match('/^\d{2}$/',
$_POST['month']))?$_POST['month']:'01';
which would set a default month value of '01' if there was either no
month value sent or it wasn't a 2-digit value.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] NULL Date Entries...
On 1 July 2010 23:40, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:26 -0700, Don Wieland wrote:
>
>> In one of my forms, I am building a variable that I can use as an
>> INSERT string.
>>
>> On my form, I have several DATE fields which exist of 3 fields MM - DD
>> -
>>
>> when I build my string it looks like this:
>>
>> array('dbf'=>'applicant_dob',
>> 'f'=>array('applicant_dob_1','applicant_dob_2','applicant_dob_3'),
>> 'req'=>0, 's'=>'/'),
>>
>> This enters in the DB fine when there is a DATE, but when these fields
>> are left empty, it inserts into the the DB as 2069-12-31.
>>
>> How does one deal with this?
>>
>> Don Wieland
>>
>
>
> How are you allowing the user to select a date? If it is three form
> fields, it might be logical to use select lists with the allowed range
> of values in.
>
> If that's not possible, use lines like this to set default values:
>
> $month = (isset($_POST['month']) && preg_match('/^\d{2}$/',
> $_POST['month']))?$_POST['month']:'01';
>
> which would set a default month value of '01' if there was either no
> month value sent or it wasn't a 2-digit value.
>
Not sure I'd bother with a preg there, intval should do it nicely.
Keep in mind you probably want to check the date at the end of this
with http://dk2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdate.php or something
similar.
Regards
Peter
--
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] NULL Date Entries...
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 23:48 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 1 July 2010 23:40, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:26 -0700, Don Wieland wrote:
> >
> >> In one of my forms, I am building a variable that I can use as an
> >> INSERT string.
> >>
> >> On my form, I have several DATE fields which exist of 3 fields MM - DD
> >> -
> >>
> >> when I build my string it looks like this:
> >>
> >> array('dbf'=>'applicant_dob',
> >> 'f'=>array('applicant_dob_1','applicant_dob_2','applicant_dob_3'),
> >> 'req'=>0, 's'=>'/'),
> >>
> >> This enters in the DB fine when there is a DATE, but when these fields
> >> are left empty, it inserts into the the DB as 2069-12-31.
> >>
> >> How does one deal with this?
> >>
> >> Don Wieland
> >>
> >
> >
> > How are you allowing the user to select a date? If it is three form
> > fields, it might be logical to use select lists with the allowed range
> > of values in.
> >
> > If that's not possible, use lines like this to set default values:
> >
> > $month = (isset($_POST['month']) && preg_match('/^\d{2}$/',
> > $_POST['month']))?$_POST['month']:'01';
> >
> > which would set a default month value of '01' if there was either no
> > month value sent or it wasn't a 2-digit value.
> >
>
> Not sure I'd bother with a preg there, intval should do it nicely.
> Keep in mind you probably want to check the date at the end of this
> with http://dk2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdate.php or something
> similar.
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
I thought of using intval(). but it would convert the string '01' into
the number 1, which wouldn't work in a MySQL date string without the
extra padding of a 0. You can do that with sprintf, but then it comes
down to what you prefer, intval and sprintf, or a single preg_match
call? Not sure there's any cause for concern over speed on this, as any
difference would be extremely slight.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] NULL Date Entries...
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 23:56 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 1 July 2010 23:50, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 23:48 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> >
> > On 1 July 2010 23:40, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:26 -0700, Don Wieland wrote:
> > >
> > >> In one of my forms, I am building a variable that I can use as an
> > >> INSERT string.
> > >>
> > >> On my form, I have several DATE fields which exist of 3 fields MM - DD
> > >> -
> > >>
> > >> when I build my string it looks like this:
> > >>
> > >> array('dbf'=>'applicant_dob',
> > >> 'f'=>array('applicant_dob_1','applicant_dob_2','applicant_dob_3'),
> > >> 'req'=>0, 's'=>'/'),
> > >>
> > >> This enters in the DB fine when there is a DATE, but when these fields
> > >> are left empty, it inserts into the the DB as 2069-12-31.
> > >>
> > >> How does one deal with this?
> > >>
> > >> Don Wieland
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > How are you allowing the user to select a date? If it is three form
> > > fields, it might be logical to use select lists with the allowed range
> > > of values in.
> > >
> > > If that's not possible, use lines like this to set default values:
> > >
> > > $month = (isset($_POST['month']) && preg_match('/^\d{2}$/',
> > > $_POST['month']))?$_POST['month']:'01';
> > >
> > > which would set a default month value of '01' if there was either no
> > > month value sent or it wasn't a 2-digit value.
> > >
> >
> > Not sure I'd bother with a preg there, intval should do it nicely.
> > Keep in mind you probably want to check the date at the end of this
> > with http://dk2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdate.php or something
> > similar.
> >
> > Regards
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > I thought of using intval(). but it would convert the string '01' into the
> > number 1, which wouldn't work in a MySQL date string without the extra
> > padding of a 0. You can do that with sprintf, but then it comes down to
> > what you prefer, intval and sprintf, or a single preg_match call? Not sure
> > there's any cause for concern over speed on this, as any difference would
> > be extremely slight.
> >
>
> The single preg_match will check the format (though not the contents,
> so you're stuck with more function calls anyway) but I'd much rather
> make sure the data is valid and format the date as I see fit with a
> date() call - you never know what users throw at you, and instead of
> failing (silently in this case) because you received 1 instead 01 I'd
> rather format the data myself.
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
> --
>
> WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
> BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
>
I suppose, I only ever check for valid content, not logical content. I
let the DB handle the date (I believe if the range goes beyond a proper
date it falls into the next date like PHP does), but I tend to use a
Javascript picker for the date. The only time I've ever worked with date
fields that allow a user entry has been on CMS systems, so I knew in
advance what specs the users had (so I could get away with relying on a
Javascript input method and hope nothing went wrong!)
However, checking to ensure the date is indeed valid and not something
like 31st February is a good idea I agree! :)
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] NULL Date Entries...
On 1 July 2010 23:50, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 23:48 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
>
> On 1 July 2010 23:40, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:26 -0700, Don Wieland wrote:
> >
> >> In one of my forms, I am building a variable that I can use as an
> >> INSERT string.
> >>
> >> On my form, I have several DATE fields which exist of 3 fields MM - DD
> >> -
> >>
> >> when I build my string it looks like this:
> >>
> >> array('dbf'=>'applicant_dob',
> >> 'f'=>array('applicant_dob_1','applicant_dob_2','applicant_dob_3'),
> >> 'req'=>0, 's'=>'/'),
> >>
> >> This enters in the DB fine when there is a DATE, but when these fields
> >> are left empty, it inserts into the the DB as 2069-12-31.
> >>
> >> How does one deal with this?
> >>
> >> Don Wieland
> >>
> >
> >
> > How are you allowing the user to select a date? If it is three form
> > fields, it might be logical to use select lists with the allowed range
> > of values in.
> >
> > If that's not possible, use lines like this to set default values:
> >
> > $month = (isset($_POST['month']) && preg_match('/^\d{2}$/',
> > $_POST['month']))?$_POST['month']:'01';
> >
> > which would set a default month value of '01' if there was either no
> > month value sent or it wasn't a 2-digit value.
> >
>
> Not sure I'd bother with a preg there, intval should do it nicely.
> Keep in mind you probably want to check the date at the end of this
> with http://dk2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdate.php or something
> similar.
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
>
> I thought of using intval(). but it would convert the string '01' into the
> number 1, which wouldn't work in a MySQL date string without the extra
> padding of a 0. You can do that with sprintf, but then it comes down to what
> you prefer, intval and sprintf, or a single preg_match call? Not sure there's
> any cause for concern over speed on this, as any difference would be
> extremely slight.
>
The single preg_match will check the format (though not the contents,
so you're stuck with more function calls anyway) but I'd much rather
make sure the data is valid and format the date as I see fit with a
date() call - you never know what users throw at you, and instead of
failing (silently in this case) because you received 1 instead 01 I'd
rather format the data myself.
Regards
Peter
--
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] mail() + localhost
Trying again; most likely I cannot do this without SSL. --Shreyas On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Shreyas Agasthya wrote: > Not sure where I am top-posting. I posted to my own mail so that one gets > to know the latest. Nevertheless, I wouldn't go against the guidelines as I > completely understand the havoc that it can create. > > The port is 587 as per Google; SMTP that I am using > is Google's (anything wrong here?). If there is a rudimentary mistake that I > am doing, please guide me. > > Regards, > Shreyas > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Daniel Brown wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:02, Shreyas Agasthya >> wrote: >> > Spoke too fast. >> > >> > Fixed that (SMTP has to be uppercase) >> > >> > Now it is : *SMTP server response: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS >> command >> > first. c15sm7128213rvi.11* >> >>(Quick note: per the list guidelines, please don't top-post in >> threads.) >> >>That error message is because you're trying to connect to an SMTPS >> (secure, SSL-encrypted SMTP) server using plain text, which won't >> work. If you have a plain SMTP server running, try that to get one >> thing resolved at a time. Change the port to 25 in your php.ini (and, >> again, restart Apache) if plain SMTP is available on the default port. >> >> -- >> >> UNADVERTISED DEDICATED SERVER SPECIALS >> SAME-DAY SETUP >> Just ask me what we're offering today! >> daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net >> http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Shreyas Agasthya > -- Regards, Shreyas Agasthya
Re: [PHP] php processing name vs. id field
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:19 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:40:56PM +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
>
>
>
> > Apart from that, html5 is not going to do away with the name
> > attribute. And name is in xhtml1 and html4.01 and there's no mention
> > of it being obsolete, deprecated or in any other fashion on the way
> > out.
> >
> > As far as reference: the source.
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/dtds.html#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Strict very
> > clearly specifies that name is still a very valid attribute.
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4 shows the same
> > in a slightly more readable format - the only mentions of anything
> > deprecated (there are no references to anything obsolete) are for the
> > isindex element and the align attribute of the legend element.
> >
> > What is the case regarding the name attribute is that it's been
> > deprecated for a few elements (such as a, form, frame, img) in XHTML1
> > and will be removed in XHTML2 (which we'll likely never see used in
> > browsers). See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.10
>
> All this is fortunate, since I don't think PHP is even aware of the ID
> attribute. Imagine trying to process form fields without the "name"
> attribute being present.
>
> Paul
>
> --
> Paul M. Foster
>
Not sure if my other email got through earlier. Replacing the name
attribute on form fields with the id one is not feasible at all. They
don't even behave the same. What would happen if you had two forms on a
page that both had an element with the same name? Using the name
attribute, everything is fine, but not so if you were using the id
instead.
Going further, what about form elements sent as an array? I don't think
the id attribute is set up to follow any sort of array format (bearing
in mind also that it's only PHP that uses the [] suffix to denote a form
element be sent as an array). Doing so would break the functionality of
many pages today (no longer would DOM functions such as getElementByID()
work anymore because you'd be retrieving potentially more than one
element, so code like document.getElementById('element').style.something
wouldn't work.
Either way, the id attribute is not, and dare I say doesn't ever look to
be, a substitute for the name attribute on form elements.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] NULL Date Entries...
> > However, checking to ensure the date is indeed valid and not something > like 31st February is a good idea I agree! :) Wait-- there's not a 31st of February? When did they change that? ;-} Paul -- Paul M. Foster -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
