RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
May be this will work $elapsed = 28.56018; $elapsed_rel = (int) 28.56018; $elapsed_deci = $elapsed - $elapsed_rel; $deci = ((int) ($elapsed_deci * 10))/10; $final = $elapsed_rel + $deci; With regards, Chetan Dattaram Rane | Software Engineer | Persistent Systems chetan_r...@persistent.co.in | Cell: +91 9766646714 | Tel: +91 (0832) 30 79228 Innovation in software product design, development and delivery- www.persistentsys.com -Original Message- From: Arno Kuhl [mailto:ak...@telkomsa.net] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 12:07 PM To: 'Andre Dubuc'; php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision -Original Message- From: Andre Dubuc [mailto:aajdu...@webhart.net] Sent: 02 January 2010 03:20 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] Need unrounded precision Hi, I need to extract the first digit after the decimal point from a number such as 28.56018, which should be '5'. I've tried a few methods to accomplish this. If I use 'ini_set' I would need to know the number of digits before the decimal (which, unfortunately, I would not have access to). Then I've tried: What I need is only the first digit after the decimal -- all the rest could be 'chopped' or discarded but without rounding the first digit after the decimal point. Is there any way of doing this? I'm stumped. Tia, Andre -- One way that should work regardless the number of digits before/after the decimal is: - convert to string (sprintf or typecast) - strpos the decimal - grab the char from the next position Cheers Arno -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php DISCLAIMER == This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: php exception handling
cant http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.set-exception-handler.php be used ?
getMessage());
}
set_exception_handler('exception_handler');
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] VC9 x86 Non Thread Safe or VC9 x86 Thread Safe ?
Hello, We use Php-cgi.exe as FastCGI with our own custom WebServer on Windows Server What to choose, VC9 x86 Non Thread Safe or VC9 x86 Thread Safe ? We have these enviroment variable : PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN: 8 Thanks you by advance stephane -- Http://www.arkadia.com/fra/ Http://www.arkadia.com/usa/ Http://www.arkadia.com/rus/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Insult my code!
2009/10/11 Eric Bauman :
> As before, please feel free to insult my code. ;-) Any and all feedback is
> of course most appreciated.
I know you're more concerned with structure, but your checkInt()
method is arguably buggy/has an un-noted assumption. It accepts ints
formatted as ints and strings, but not floats:
assertNull( $fixture->setBalance($int) );
}
function testSetBalanceAcceptsFloats()
{
$fixture = new BankModel();
$float = (float)1351236;
$this->assertNull( $fixture->setBalance($float) );
}
function testSetBalanceAcceptsStrings()
{
$fixture = new BankModel();
$string = (string)1351236;
$this->assertNull( $fixture->setBalance($string) );
}
}
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] VC9 x86 Non Thread Safe or VC9 x86 Thread Safe ?
- Original Message > From: loki > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Sent: Mon, October 12, 2009 3:13:41 AM > Subject: [PHP] VC9 x86 Non Thread Safe or VC9 x86 Thread Safe ? > > Hello, > > We use Php-cgi.exe as FastCGI with our own custom WebServer on Windows Server > What to choose, VC9 x86 Non Thread Safe or VC9 x86 Thread Safe ? > > We have these enviroment variable : > > PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN: 8 > > Thanks you by advance > stephane > > -- > > Http://www.arkadia.com/fra/ > Http://www.arkadia.com/usa/ > Http://www.arkadia.com/rus/ > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php Stephane, If my memory serves, use NTS. Regards, Tommy -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] How do YOU set default function/method params?
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:17:00PM -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
> Stephan Ebelt wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:48:32PM -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
> >> Here is a problem that I have had for years now. I have been trying to
> >> come up
> >> with the perfect solution for this problem. But, I have come down to two
> >> different methods for solving it.
> >>
> >> Here is the problem...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Now, we all have a function or method like this floating around somewhere.
> >>
> >> My question is, how do YOU go about setting the required entries of the
> >> $headers
> >> array() ?
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> END of examples...
> >>
> >> Now, IMO, the last one is the simplest one and for me, I think it will be
> >> the
> >> new way that I solve this type of problem.
> >>
> >> But, my question that I put out to all of you is...
> >>
> >>How would you solve this problem?
> >
> > I have use this array_merge() approach mentioned in other posts for
> > quite some time but found that it introduced many bugs when fieldnames
> > changed.
> > Ie. if the defaults come from a database table and I changed the schema it
> > caused undefined values during the merging and - worse - sometimes messed
> > up the
> > inner workings of functions...
> >
> > Then I heard of the "value object" approach somewhere and found that much
> > more
> > solid. One would basically define a class where default values are
> > represented
> > by its properties. Ie:
> >
> > class vo_email extends vo {
> > public $to = '';
> > public $from = '';
> > public $subject = '(no subject)';
> > public $body = '';
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > the constructor can make sure that absolutly necessary values are required
> > and
> > set properly - and could complain if something is not right. There could be
> > methods that add() or set() or change() things. These could also be
> > inherited
> > from a very generic class "vo" so that this stuff is written once and
> > applies
> > to all sorts of defaults in the program.
> > In my app the inherited constructor accepts arrays as parameter and assigns
> > their elements to the object properties and - by that - overwrites the
> > default
> > settings. If elements do not match with the defined properties it will
> > trigger
> > a very visible call trace.
> >
> > A function like sendEmail() would then require a object of type vo_email as
> > parameter and would work with its properties internally and can rely on it
> > as
> > the vo's constructor should have catched anything bad.
> >
> > If additional logic for the input values is required, it can be added
> > easily:
> >
> > class dao_email extends vo_email {
> > ...
> > public function encode_body() {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > public function sanitize_mail_address() {
> >
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
>
> This is a very interesting approach. How would you initialize the class?
> Using
> a Singleton Method, or a Globally available class variable
as far as I understood/use it: I try to hardcode as many workable defaults in
the vo class as possible (ie. see $subject in the example). Then I create
objects
by passing result records from the database (arrays) to the constructor. That
either returns a object or crashes the application if something is wrong.
Optionally I can create objects without any passed-in parameter which will give
one with only the defaults set. Depending on the class' definition those may
have empty properties. These can be set by subsequent code like
$object->empty_property='bla'. This way its not much different than using plain
arrays except that its still an object which might have additional
functionality.
in the email example the constructor should probably refuse to return a object
unless $to and $from are given. I can't see much use without these two.
stephan
>
>
> > sendEmail() would then require a dao_email object (dao=data access object)
> > as
> > input.
> >
> > stephan
> >
> >> TIA
> >>
> >> Jim Lucas
> >>
> >> --
> >> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] How do YOU set default function/method params?
2009/10/12 Stephan Ebelt : > as far as I understood/use it: I try to hardcode as many workable defaults in > the vo class as possible (ie. see $subject in the example). Then I create > objects > by passing result records from the database (arrays) to the constructor. That > either returns a object or crashes the application if something is wrong. > Optionally I can create objects without any passed-in parameter which will > give > one with only the defaults set. Depending on the class' definition those may Ok, I'm going to make a case against the use of default values hard-coded within the class here: a) Default values mean more code. The less code you have, the less bugs. Just strip the defaults out, and they'll never cause errors. b) Default values hide missing values. If a value gets mislaid during the build process, the class will still work, kinda, sortof, but it won't behave as expected. Better to exit loudly and let the build manager fix the missing value, rather than try to muddle through on partial data, and fail /really/ impressively further down the road. c) You should store all your config options in the same place. This is simply good practice - it makes life easier for anyone coming after you who knows that /everything/ is in one place. Zend_Config is a nice approach - the Config object parses an ini file, and you pass fragments of the config object to your class constructors. Eg: $conf = new Zend_Config_Ini( 'config/settings.ini', 'live' ); $db = Zend_Db::factory( $conf->application->databasesettings ); d) Default values lead to assumptions. MyClass assumes that DbClass connects to localhost if nothing is passed. This means that MyClass is relying on a feature of DbClass where it doesn't strictly have to, and DbClass is a little bit less of a black box. e) Defaults aren't. What makes sense on one machine (eg a default of 'localhost' for the db) may not make sense on another. Rather than tweak the class defaults to fit the local conditions every time you deploy it, and have dozens of slightly different versions hanging around, just be explicit and push the parameters in from outside. Comments welcome of course, but I've strayed off PHP and into OO design, here. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
A simple way to do that would be: $elapsed = strval( 28.56018 ); $pos = strpos( $elapsed, '.' ); echo $elapsed[ ++$pos ]; On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Andre Dubuc wrote: > Hi, > > I need to extract the first digit after the decimal point from a number > such > as 28.56018, which should be '5'. > > I've tried a few methods to accomplish this. If I use 'ini_set' I would > need > to know the number of digits before the decimal (which, unfortunately, I > would not have access to). > > Then I've tried: > > >$elapsed = 28.56018; > >$digit = round($elapsed, 1); // rounds result is '6' >$digit = number_format($elapsed, 1); // still rounds result to '6' > > ?> > > What I need is only the first digit after the decimal -- all the rest could > be 'chopped' or discarded but without rounding the first digit after the > decimal point. > > Is there any way of doing this? > > I'm stumped. > > Tia, > Andre > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Thanks, Diogo Neves Web Developer @ SAPO.pt by PrimeIT.pt
[PHP] Wrighting to $_POST array
I have some code which will loop over the whole $_POST array, runs it
through mysql_real_escape_string and then writes it all back to the array
again, which seams to work. Are there any incompatibility problems or such
like with writing into the $_POST or $_GET array?
function clean_post()
{
$npost = array();
while ($value = current($_POST))
{
$key = key($_POST);
$npost += array("$key" => mysql_real_escape_string($value));
next($_POST);
}
$_POST = $npost;
}
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Wrighting to $_POST array
hessi...@hessiess.com wrote:
I have some code which will loop over the whole $_POST array, runs it
through mysql_real_escape_string and then writes it all back to the array
again, which seams to work. Are there any incompatibility problems or such
like with writing into the $_POST or $_GET array?
function clean_post()
{
$npost = array();
while ($value = current($_POST))
{
$key = key($_POST);
$npost += array("$key" => mysql_real_escape_string($value));
next($_POST);
}
$_POST = $npost;
}
There could be problems when introducing slashes if you use other
peoples codes. But if this is for your own code it probably wont matter.
And here is a shorter version of your code :
foreach($_POST as $key=>$val)
$_POST[$key] = mysql_real_escape_string($val);
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Wrighting to $_POST array
Jay Ess wrote:
> hessi...@hessiess.com wrote:
>> I have some code which will loop over the whole $_POST array, runs it
>> through mysql_real_escape_string and then writes it all back to the array
>> again, which seams to work. Are there any incompatibility problems or
>> such
>> like with writing into the $_POST or $_GET array?
>>
>> function clean_post()
>> {
>> $npost = array();
>>
>> while ($value = current($_POST))
>> {
>> $key = key($_POST);
>> $npost += array("$key" => mysql_real_escape_string($value));
>> next($_POST);
>> }
>>
>> $_POST = $npost;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>
> There could be problems when introducing slashes if you use other
> peoples codes. But if this is for your own code it probably wont matter.
>
> And here is a shorter version of your code :
> foreach($_POST as $key=>$val)
> $_POST[$key] = mysql_real_escape_string($val);
>
But, first, you need to use get_magic_quotes_gpc() to see if magic_quotes_gpc is
turned on. If so, you need to run stripslashes() on your variables before you
run the mysql_real_escape_string() on them.
if ( get_magic_quotes_gpc() ) {
$_POST = array_map('stripslashes', $_POST);
}
$_POST = array_map('mysql_real_escape_string', $_POST);
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Wrighting to $_POST array
> But, first, you need to use get_magic_quotes_gpc() to see if magic_quotes_gpc
> is
> turned on. If so, you need to run stripslashes() on your variables before you
> run the mysql_real_escape_string() on them.
>
>
> if ( get_magic_quotes_gpc() ) {
> $_POST = array_map('stripslashes', $_POST);
> }
> $_POST = array_map('mysql_real_escape_string', $_POST);
I would totally remove magic_quotes_gpc rather than this for each request:
if ( get_magic_quotes_gpc() ) {
$_GET = array_map('stripslashes', $_GET);
$_POST = array_map('stripslashes', $_POST);
// $_REQUEST = array_map('stripslashes', $_REQUEST);
$_COOKIES = array_map('stripslashes', $_COOKIES);
}
there is a reason if magic_quotes has been removed by PHP defaults since ages
Regards
_
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on
Facebook.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_2:092009
[PHP] exec() confused by a specially crafted string
When shell command returns a specially crafted string, I get an empty
array as $output of exec(), instead of the string. I can very easily
reproduce this issue as follows:
Put the following lines in bug.php:
Then put the following in echostr.php (the string is just one line
actually, new lines may be inserted by this mail agent, I provide a link
below):
65536] S=[9216->65536]";}i:9;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:25:"UDPv4
link local: [undef]";}i:10;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:38:"UDPv4
link remote: 81.215.105.114:1194";}i:11;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:98:"TLS
Error: TLS key negotiation failed to occur within 60 seconds (check your
network connectivity)";}i:12;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:31:"TLS
Error: TLS handshake failed";}i:13;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:23:"TCP/UDP:
Closing socket";}i:14;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:52:"SIGUSR1[soft,tls-error]
received, process restarting";}i:15;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:26:"Restart
pause, 2 second(s)";}i:16;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:102:"NOTE:
OpenVPN 2.1 requires \'--script-security 2\' or higher to call user-defined
scripts or executables";}i:17;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:24:"Re-using
SSL/TLS context";}i:18;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:27:"LZO
compression initialized";}i:19;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:63:"Control
Channel MTU parms [ L:1542 D:138 EF:38 EB:0 ET:0 EL:0
]";}i:20;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:70:"Data
Channel MTU parms [ L:1542 D:1450 EF:42 EB:135 ET:0 EL:0 AF:3/1
]";}i:21;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:39:"Local
Options hash (VER=V4): \'41690919\'";}i:22;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:49:"Expected
Remote Options hash (VER=V4): \'530fdded\'";}i:23;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:48:"Socket
Buffers: R=[41600->65536] S=[9216->65536]";}i:24;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:25:"UDPv4
link local: [undef]";}}';
?>
When you execute bug.php, you will get an empty array printed out:
Array
(
)
But actually, $output should have contained the string above as element
0 of the array.
If you delete or add a character in the string, exec() runs
correctly and you get the intended result. So the issue is specific to
this special string. You can download echostr.php contents at this link:
http://comixwall.org/dmdocuments/echostr
The problem is not with the size of the string, because much longer
strings are fine.
Also this issue does *not* exists with passthru(), shell_exec()
functions and backtick operator. Furthermore, exec() return value, i.e.
the last line of shell command output seems fine too (it contains the
string correctly). So I believe the issue is internal to exec(),
effecting $output contents only.
As you can guess, this string is in fact serialized openvpn startup log
lines (I just escaped the single quotes for testing purposes, that's
all), it is not some manually crafted string. Therefore, the chances are
quite high that I will get more than one similar situation in the
future, specifically every time the openvpn logs are rotated, and I
start openvpn.
I have confirmed this issue on OpenBSD, Linux, and Windows. Here are the
versions:
OpenBSD:
PHP 5.2.8 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.3 (cli) (built: Mar 1 2009
10:26:06)
Copyright (c) 1997-2008 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2008 Zend Technologies
with Suhosin v0.9.27, Copyright (c) 2007, by SektionEins GmbH
Linux:
PHP 5.2.6-3ubuntu4.2 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Aug 21
2009 21:43:13)
Copyright (c) 1997-2008 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2008 Zend Technologies
Windows:
PHP 5.2.11 (cli) (built: Sep 16 2009 19:39:46)
Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2009 Zend Technologies
Since Windows version is without Suhosin patch, suhosin as culprit is
ruled out. (Also to test on Windows, I changed the exec she
Re: [PHP] exec() confused by a specially crafted string
Confirmed, it also happens to me on Linux, PHP version:
PHP 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Aug 21
2009 19:52:39)
Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Zend Technologies
And adding a single character to the echoed string makes it work fine,
seems like a bug to me.
Regards,
Jonathan
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Soner Tari wrote:
> When shell command returns a specially crafted string, I get an empty
> array as $output of exec(), instead of the string. I can very easily
> reproduce this issue as follows:
>
> Put the following lines in bug.php:
>
> exec('php echostr.php', $output);
> print_r($output);
> echo "\n";
> ?>
>
> Then put the following in echostr.php (the string is just one line
> actually, new lines may be inserted by this mail agent, I provide a link
> below):
>
> echo 'a:25:{i:0;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 7";s:4:"Time";s:8:"16:00:01";s:7:"Process";s:16:"newsyslog[23117]";s:3:"Log";s:19:"logfile
> turned over";}i:1;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:76:"OpenVPN
> 2.1_rc18 x86_64-unknown-openbsd4.5 [SSL] [LZO1] built on Jun 26
> 2009";}i:2;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:102:"NOTE:
> OpenVPN 2.1 requires \'--script-security 2\' or higher to call user-defined
> scripts or executables";}i:3;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:27:"LZO
> compression initialized";}i:4;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:63:"Control
> Channel MTU parms [ L:1542 D:138 EF:38 EB:0 ET:0 EL:0
> ]";}i:5;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:70:"Data
> Channel MTU parms [ L:1542 D:1450 EF:42 EB:135 ET:0 EL:0 AF:3/1
> ]";}i:6;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:39:"Local
> Options hash (VER=V4): \'41690919\'";}i:7;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:12:"openvpn[226]";s:3:"Log";s:49:"Expected
> Remote Options hash (VER=V4): \'530fdded\'";}i:8;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:48:"Socket
> Buffers: R=[41600->65536] S=[9216->65536]";}i:9;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:25:"UDPv4
> link local: [undef]";}i:10;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:43:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:38:"UDPv4
> link remote: 81.215.105.114:1194";}i:11;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:98:"TLS
> Error: TLS key negotiation failed to occur within 60 seconds (check your
> network connectivity)";}i:12;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:31:"TLS
> Error: TLS handshake failed";}i:13;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:23:"TCP/UDP:
> Closing socket";}i:14;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:52:"SIGUSR1[soft,tls-error]
> received, process restarting";}i:15;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:55";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:26:"Restart
> pause, 2 second(s)";}i:16;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:102:"NOTE:
> OpenVPN 2.1 requires \'--script-security 2\' or higher to call user-defined
> scripts or executables";}i:17;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:24:"Re-using
> SSL/TLS context";}i:18;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:27:"LZO
> compression initialized";}i:19;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:63:"Control
> Channel MTU parms [ L:1542 D:138 EF:38 EB:0 ET:0 EL:0
> ]";}i:20;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:70:"Data
> Channel MTU parms [ L:1542 D:1450 EF:42 EB:135 ET:0 EL:0 AF:3/1
> ]";}i:21;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:39:"Local
> Options hash (VER=V4): \'41690919\'";}i:22;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:49:"Expected
> Remote Options hash (VER=V4): \'530fdded\'";}i:23;a:4:{s:4:"Date";s:6:"Aug
> 10";s:4:"Time";s:8:"22:44:57";s:7:"Process";s:14:"openvpn[31938]";s:3:"Log";s:48:"Socket
> Buffers: R=[41600->65536] S=[9216->6553
RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
> Hmmm... Didn't think about this, but % only works with int values it was just future prof precaution since this statement is false for many other languages. In few words I am not sure PHP6 does the same ... never mind so far Regards _ Keep your friends updated—even when you’re not signed in. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_5:092010
RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
>> Hmmm... Didn't think about this, but % only works with int values > >it was just future prof precaution since this statement is false for many >other languages. >In few words I am not sure PHP6 does the same ... never mind so far Good to know. In that case, I would probably just use intval() instead of >> since it's clearer and bitwise shifts aren't necessarily integer only either. Jaime -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
> Couldn't this be done with just simple math functions? indeed: $a = 28.56018; $b = $a * 10 % 10 >> 0; Regards _ Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook updates, right from Hotmail®. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_4:092009
RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
> -Original Message- > From: Diogo Neves [mailto:dafne...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 9:19 AM > To: Andre Dubuc > Cc: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Need unrounded precision > > A simple way to do that would be: > > $elapsed = strval( 28.56018 ); > $pos = strpos( $elapsed, '.' ); > echo $elapsed[ ++$pos ]; > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Andre Dubuc > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I need to extract the first digit after the decimal point from a > number > > such > > as 28.56018, which should be '5'. Couldn't this be done with just simple math functions? $a = 28.56018; $b = intval(($a*10)-(intval($a)*10)); or: $a = 28.56018; $b = intval(($a-intval($a))*10); Jaime -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
>> Couldn't this be done with just simple math functions? > >indeed: > >$a = 28.56018; >$b = $a * 10 % 10 >> 0; Hmmm... Didn't think about this, but % only works with int values, so $b = $a * 10 % 10; Should work as well. Jaime -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] exec() confused by a specially crafted string
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:21 -0300, Jonathan Tapicer wrote: > Confirmed, it also happens to me on Linux, PHP version: > > PHP 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Aug 21 > 2009 19:52:39) > Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP Group > Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Zend Technologies > > And adding a single character to the echoed string makes it work fine, > seems like a bug to me. Thanks, filed the bug report: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49847 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] How do YOU set default function/method params?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:44:56PM +0100, David Otton wrote: > 2009/10/12 Stephan Ebelt : > > > as far as I understood/use it: I try to hardcode as many workable defaults > > in > > the vo class as possible (ie. see $subject in the example). Then I create > > objects > > by passing result records from the database (arrays) to the constructor. > > That > > either returns a object or crashes the application if something is wrong. > > > Optionally I can create objects without any passed-in parameter which will > > give > > one with only the defaults set. Depending on the class' definition those may > > Ok, I'm going to make a case against the use of default values > hard-coded within the class here: > [...] I skip a) and b) for now as I mostly agree and first like to clarify... > > c) You should store all your config options in the same place. ... that I do not use this approach for global program config options. If this was the intent of the original question I may have mistaken it entirely. (I actually use constants for all on-site configurations and all are defined in one file, there aren't so many and they can't be modified at runtime (I think)). My primary objective for using VOs was to have very strict and clear definitions for data structures inside the program. Passing loosely defined arrays from function to function caused too many bugs in my code. Now things crash much earlier and I get to know problems quicker. (besides: phpdoc creates nice crosslinks that tell precisely what some method needs, no long parameter lists but thats also straying off). stephan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] exec() confused by a specially crafted string
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Soner Tari wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:21 -0300, Jonathan Tapicer wrote: >> Confirmed, it also happens to me on Linux, PHP version: >> >> PHP 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Aug 21 >> 2009 19:52:39) >> Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP Group >> Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Zend Technologies >> >> And adding a single character to the echoed string makes it work fine, >> seems like a bug to me. > > Thanks, filed the bug report: > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49847 > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Confirmed (again) here: PHP Version => 5.3.0 Build Date => Jul 1 2009 17:55:55 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision
bitwise right shift is probably the fastest cast to int so far ... still in many languages, intval is a function call being a cast in both cases (int) is good as well ... bitwise, casting, works with strings, arrays, boolean, whatever as well. I don't think there is any difference in php, except when the integer is "too big" ... but this was not the case, we had to deal with 1 to 10 :-) Regards > From: jbo...@mindsites.com > To: an_...@hotmail.com > CC: php-general@lists.php.net > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:33:10 -0500 > Subject: RE: [PHP] Need unrounded precision > > >> Hmmm... Didn't think about this, but % only works with int values > > > >it was just future prof precaution since this statement is false for many > >other languages. > >In few words I am not sure PHP6 does the same ... never mind so far > > Good to know. In that case, I would probably just use intval() instead of >> > since it's clearer and bitwise shifts aren't necessarily integer only either. > > Jaime > _ Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on Facebook. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_2:092009
[PHP] libphp5.so rebuild required?
Hi, We are looking to upgrade php 5.2.1 to 5.2.8. Do we need to rebuild the libphp5.so also to detect the new version of underlying php or will the same old version of libphp5.so build for php 5.2.1, automatically detect a new underlying php installation? thanks
[PHP] How to bypass (pipe) curl_exec return value directly to a file?
Newbie question. I need to download a very large amount of xml data from a site using CURL. How to bypass (pipe) curl_exec return value directly to a file, without using memory allocation? set_time_limit(0); $ch = curl_init($siteURL); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true); $mixed = curl_exec($ch); How to set/pipe $mixed as a (disk) file, so that data returned by curl_exec is directly saved to the disk-file, and not involving memory allocation? Thank you. -PHP 5 -Windows XP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Insult my code!
On 12/10/2009 9:21 PM, David Otton wrote: 2009/10/11 Eric Bauman: As before, please feel free to insult my code. ;-) Any and all feedback is of course most appreciated. I know you're more concerned with structure, but your checkInt() method is arguably buggy/has an un-noted assumption. It accepts ints formatted as ints and strings, but not floats: *sigh* sometimes I really wish PHP allowed one to be a bit more heavy-handed with types (optional real type hinting would be nice). I guess I only ever worried about string (from DB) and int (internal call) as in my specific use I would never be passing a float. You make an excellent point however; I suppose in the interests of completeness, forward compatibility etc. I should take into account more possibilities. Perhaps I should just throw an exception in deposit() etc. if the argument isn't int and worry about converting elsewhere. Also thanks for the sample TestCase code! I've never really thought about unit testing in PHP, despite doing so in Java etc. Reading about PHPUnit brought me on to phpUnderControl - interesting stuff! Best regards, Eric -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
