Re: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 21:46 -0800, bruce wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Got a bit of a question/issue that I'm trying to resolve. I'm asking this of
> a few groups so bear with me.
> 
> I'm considering a situation where I have multiple processes running, and
> each process is going to access a number of files in a dir. Each process
> accesses a unique group of files, and then writes the group of files to
> another dir. I can easily handle this by using a form of locking, where I
> have the processes lock/read a file and only access the group of files in
> the dir based on the  open/free status of the lockfile.
> 
> However, the issue with the approach is that it's somewhat synchronous. I'm
> looking for something that might be more asynchronous/parallel, in that I'd
> like to have multiple processes each access a unique group of files from the
> given dir as fast as possible.
> 
> So.. Any thoughts/pointers/comments would be greatly appreciated. Any
> pointers to academic research, etc.. would be useful.
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
You could do it one of several ways:

1. Have the files actually written to a subversion/git repository, and
let that handle differences.
2. Store the files in a database as blobs
3. Do something clever with filename suffixes to indicate versions of
the file


Ash
www.ashleysheridan.co.uk


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread Jim Lucas

Stuart wrote:

2009/3/1 Shawn McKenzie 


Stuart wrote:

2009/2/28 Shawn McKenzie 


Robert Cummings wrote:

On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:11 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:

On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:32 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:

On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:02 +0600, 9el wrote:

---

Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live.

Get

a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
www.ubuntu.com


--


On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Robert Cummings <

rob...@interjinn.com>wrote:

On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 09:28 -0700, LuKreme wrote:

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:12, Hans Schultz 

wrote:

Hahahah,I was thinking the same thing

The trouble is most people mean "compile a source file to an
executable binary" when they sat compile. By this measure, PHP

does

not compile.

I add the following to the top of my PHP shell scripts:

   #!/usr/bin/php -qC

Then I do the following:

   chmod 775 script.php

Then I run it as follows:

   ./script.php

Look... and executable binary :) Don't say it's not binary. All

data

on

a hard disk is binary (although I do know what you mean ;)

Well you are running shell script style execution its not example of
Compiled code or Binary

The data in the file is ASCII or UTF text :)

Which are subsets of binary representation ;)


Compilation happens when its zendOptimized or OpCoded. Its then is

converted

into binary content file.

But one could probably quite easily set up a system whereby

eAccelerator

or APC or Zend Optimizer cache bytecodes are torn from a file run
similarly. As I said in an earlier post... the line between the
definition of interpreted language and compiled language is quite

blurry

these days.

Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP



ASCII is only a subset of binary in a pedantic, literal sense. When
people say binary file, they mean one that contains characters which

are

outside the normal display spectrum, such as chr(0), etc.

And the argument that PHP is not compiled requires a certain level of
pedantry and it is still an incorrect argument since it most certainly
is compiled to an intermediary virtual machine code.

Cheers,
Rob.

Still, in PHP $compile_time == $run_time.


I haven't been following this thread, but this caught my eye as being
completely wrong. There are distinct compile and execution phases when

PHP

runs a script, and different rules apply to each. If you don't believe me
try defaulting the value of a class variable to the result of a function.

-Stuart


Rob, I wasn't talking about time.  I was talking about they're pretty
much the same as in when they execute.

Stuart,

Great, then show the OP how he can enforce strict error checking at
compile time and halt compilation and runtime altogether.



Like I said I haven't been following this thread so have no idea what the
original question was. I was just pointing out that your assertion
that $compile_time == $run_time is incorrect.

As far as error checking goes the PHP engine performs syntactical checks
during compile time but due to the highly flexible nature of the language
it's not possible to do most error checking until runtime.

-Stuart



And I quote:

Hello,
I am beginner with PHP and prior to PHP I have worked with java for some time
and with perl for very short period. I can't help to notice some things that
are little annoyance for me with PHP, but I am sure someone more experienced
can help me :-)
Is there in PHP something like "use strict" from perl? I find it pretty
annoying to need to run script over and over again just to find out that I
made typo in variable name.
Is there some way for PHP to cache some data on the page? I like very much
PHP's speed but it would be even better to be able to cache some frequently
used data from database?
Also regarding databases, I liked a lot java's way of sending data to database
using parameters ("select * from user where username = ?" and then passing
parameter separately with database doing necessary escaping and everything).
Is there something like PHPDBC similar to JDBC?

TIA,
Hans

End Quote;

Jim Lucas

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:57 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Stuart wrote:
> > 2009/2/28 Shawn McKenzie 
> > 
> >> Robert Cummings wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:11 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>  On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:32 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:02 +0600, 9el wrote:
> >> ---
> >> Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
> >> a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
> >> www.ubuntu.com
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Robert Cummings <
> >> rob...@interjinn.com>wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 09:28 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>  On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:12, Hans Schultz 
> >> wrote:
> > Hahahah,I was thinking the same thing
>  The trouble is most people mean "compile a source file to an
>  executable binary" when they sat compile. By this measure, PHP does
>  not compile.
> >>> I add the following to the top of my PHP shell scripts:
> >>>
> >>>#!/usr/bin/php -qC
> >>>
> >>> Then I do the following:
> >>>
> >>>chmod 775 script.php
> >>>
> >>> Then I run it as follows:
> >>>
> >>>./script.php
> >>>
> >>> Look... and executable binary :) Don't say it's not binary. All data
> >> on
> >>> a hard disk is binary (although I do know what you mean ;)
> >> Well you are running shell script style execution its not example of
> >> Compiled code or Binary
> >>
> >> The data in the file is ASCII or UTF text :)
> > Which are subsets of binary representation ;)
> >
> >> Compilation happens when its zendOptimized or OpCoded. Its then is
> >> converted
> >> into binary content file.
> > But one could probably quite easily set up a system whereby
> >> eAccelerator
> > or APC or Zend Optimizer cache bytecodes are torn from a file run
> > similarly. As I said in an earlier post... the line between the
> > definition of interpreted language and compiled language is quite
> >> blurry
> > these days.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob.
> > --
> > http://www.interjinn.com
> > Application and Templating Framework for PHP
> >
> >
>  ASCII is only a subset of binary in a pedantic, literal sense. When
>  people say binary file, they mean one that contains characters which are
>  outside the normal display spectrum, such as chr(0), etc.
> >>> And the argument that PHP is not compiled requires a certain level of
> >>> pedantry and it is still an incorrect argument since it most certainly
> >>> is compiled to an intermediary virtual machine code.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Rob.
> >> Still, in PHP $compile_time == $run_time.
> > 
> > 
> > I haven't been following this thread, but this caught my eye as being
> > completely wrong. There are distinct compile and execution phases when PHP
> > runs a script, and different rules apply to each. If you don't believe me
> > try defaulting the value of a class variable to the result of a function.
> > 
> > -Stuart
> > 
> Rob, I wasn't talking about time.  I was talking about they're pretty
> much the same as in when they execute.

They're not if you're using a compile cache.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 21:46 -0800, bruce wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Got a bit of a question/issue that I'm trying to resolve. I'm asking this of
> a few groups so bear with me.
> 
> I'm considering a situation where I have multiple processes running, and
> each process is going to access a number of files in a dir. Each process
> accesses a unique group of files, and then writes the group of files to
> another dir. I can easily handle this by using a form of locking, where I
> have the processes lock/read a file and only access the group of files in
> the dir based on the  open/free status of the lockfile.
> 
> However, the issue with the approach is that it's somewhat synchronous. I'm
> looking for something that might be more asynchronous/parallel, in that I'd
> like to have multiple processes each access a unique group of files from the
> given dir as fast as possible.
> 
> So.. Any thoughts/pointers/comments would be greatly appreciated. Any
> pointers to academic research, etc.. would be useful.

Threads? Or spawn off child processes. Maybe I'm not understanding your
issues well enough.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread Gevorg Harutyunyan
Hi guys

I need to create file upload progress bar using PHP and AJAX. I found two
Pecl extensions that support that may be used: "uploadprogress" and
"php-apc".
I asked my shared hosting provider to add that extensions, but my request
was declined, because "uploadprogress" is still BETA version and "php-apc"
dont works
fine with Fast-CGI version of PHP.

Had you similar problem or do you know how else can I track upload progress?

Btw site is www.soongy.com

Thanks for help


Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread tedd

The OP asked:


Is there in PHP something like "use strict" from perl? I find it pretty
annoying to need to run script over and over again just to find out that I
made typo in variable name.


And I've been waiting for an answer myself, but I haven't seen one.

From what I remember, in perl if you use "use strict;" it requires to 
to define your variables (my) before using them. If you make a 
variable typo in your code, then you'll trigger an error when you try 
to run it.


From what I've seen of php, even with using strict error reporting, 
you can do that all day long without generating an error.


So the answer appears to be "No, you can't do that in PHP." Is that the answer?

Cheers,

tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread tedd

At 2:20 PM +0400 3/1/09, Gevorg Harutyunyan wrote:

Hi guys

I need to create file upload progress bar using PHP and AJAX. I found two
Pecl extensions that support that may be used: "uploadprogress" and
"php-apc".
I asked my shared hosting provider to add that extensions, but my request
was declined, because "uploadprogress" is still BETA version and "php-apc"
dont works
fine with Fast-CGI version of PHP.

Had you similar problem or do you know how else can I track upload progress?


Gevorg:

I'm sure this isn't the answer you want, but I went that route 
several times and never found a better solution than this:


http://webbytedd.com/bb/wait/

Throw up a "wait" graphic and allow the process to take it's course 
without intervention.


If you want to programmatically determine over time how much of the 
file has been uploaded and update a progress bar, then you're in for 
quite the learning experience.


Cheers,

tedd

PS: After everything is said and done, you may steal any of the 
graphics I provide above -- I stole them fair and square myself. 
Number 39 is not a wait graphic, it just assumed me.


--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread Nitsan Bin-Nun
There is no need to go that far, try to google a bit about swfupload.

In short, this is a flash & javascript component that give's you the ability
to maintain the upload, get the current speed, get the current amount of
uploaded data, etc. It is very simple and works like a charm on a dedi
server. There are some issues on shared server sometimes, but even these
things are not that much complicated and can be easily solved.

HTH,
Nitsan

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:09 PM, tedd  wrote:

> At 2:20 PM +0400 3/1/09, Gevorg Harutyunyan wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I need to create file upload progress bar using PHP and AJAX. I found two
>> Pecl extensions that support that may be used: "uploadprogress" and
>> "php-apc".
>> I asked my shared hosting provider to add that extensions, but my request
>> was declined, because "uploadprogress" is still BETA version and "php-apc"
>> dont works
>> fine with Fast-CGI version of PHP.
>>
>> Had you similar problem or do you know how else can I track upload
>> progress?
>>
>
> Gevorg:
>
> I'm sure this isn't the answer you want, but I went that route several
> times and never found a better solution than this:
>
> http://webbytedd.com/bb/wait/
>
> Throw up a "wait" graphic and allow the process to take it's course without
> intervention.
>
> If you want to programmatically determine over time how much of the file
> has been uploaded and update a progress bar, then you're in for quite the
> learning experience.
>
> Cheers,
>
> tedd
>
> PS: After everything is said and done, you may steal any of the graphics I
> provide above -- I stole them fair and square myself. Number 39 is not a
> wait graphic, it just assumed me.
>
> --
> ---
> http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 08:36 -0500, tedd wrote:
> The OP asked:
> 
> >Is there in PHP something like "use strict" from perl? I find it pretty
> >annoying to need to run script over and over again just to find out that I
> >made typo in variable name.
> 
> And I've been waiting for an answer myself, but I haven't seen one.
> 
>  From what I remember, in perl if you use "use strict;" it requires to 
> to define your variables (my) before using them. If you make a 
> variable typo in your code, then you'll trigger an error when you try 
> to run it.
> 
>  From what I've seen of php, even with using strict error reporting, 
> you can do that all day long without generating an error.
> 
> So the answer appears to be "No, you can't do that in PHP." Is that the 
> answer?

You can do anything you want... :)

 $init )
{
$this->{$prop} = $init;
}
}
else
{
$this->{$props} = null;
}
}

$this->___init = false;
}

function __set( $name, $value )
{
if( !$this->___init )
{
die( 'Attempt to set non-existent property: '
.get_class( $this ).'->'.$name."\n" );
}

$this->{$name} = $value;
}

function __get( $name )
{
die( 'Attempt to get non-existent property: '
.get_class( $this ).'->'.$name."\n" );
}
}

//
// Declare strict properties...
//
$my = new StrictProps( 'foo', 'fee', 'fii' );
print_r( $my );

//
// Declare and intialize strict properties...
//
$my = new StrictProps( array( 'foo' => 'Foo1', 'fee' => 'Fee1' ) );
print_r( $my );

echo $my->foo."\n";
echo $my->fee."\n";
echo $my->blah."\n";

?>

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread tedd

At 4:17 PM +0200 3/1/09, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:

There is no need to go that far, try to google a bit about swfupload.

In short, this is a flash & javascript component that give's you the 
ability to maintain the upload, get the current speed, get the 
current amount of uploaded data, etc. It is very simple and works 
like a charm on a dedi server. There are some issues on shared 
server sometimes, but even these things are not that much 
complicated and can be easily solved.


HTH,



Nitsan

Oh yeah, try this:

http://swfupload.org/documentation/demonstration

and go through the "up" link -- and then try the "See it in action!" 
link and also try the "Demonstration" link. You can even use the 
demo.swfupload.org link, which will provide you with this:


http://demo.swfupload.org/v220beta5/index.htm

All of which is well worth the effort if you're trying to waste your 
time. If their code is as good as their web site, no thanks -- I'll 
pass.


But if I was to seriously investigate it, I would go directly to Google:

http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/

However, I haven't a clue as to if it works or not.

Cheers,

tedd


--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread tedd

At 9:21 AM -0500 3/1/09, Robert Cummings wrote:

On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 08:36 -0500, tedd wrote:

 The OP asked:

 >Is there in PHP something like "use strict" from perl? I find it pretty
 >annoying to need to run script over and over again just to find out that I
 >made typo in variable name.

 And I've been waiting for an answer myself, but I haven't seen one.

  From what I remember, in perl if you use "use strict;" it requires to
 to define your variables (my) before using them. If you make a
 variable typo in your code, then you'll trigger an error when you try
 to run it.

  From what I've seen of php, even with using strict error reporting,
 you can do that all day long without generating an error.

 So the answer appears to be "No, you can't do that in PHP." Is 
that the answer?


You can do anything you want... :)


Rob:

Just to show that your words of wisdom don't go unnoticed, see here:

http://php1.net/oop/strict/

That's pretty slick.

Now if I only understood WT* you did, I would be a better programmer for it.

Thanks,

tedd

--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:48 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 9:21 AM -0500 3/1/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 08:36 -0500, tedd wrote:
> >>  The OP asked:
> >>
> >>  >Is there in PHP something like "use strict" from perl? I find it pretty
> >>  >annoying to need to run script over and over again just to find out that 
> >> I
> >>  >made typo in variable name.
> >>
> >>  And I've been waiting for an answer myself, but I haven't seen one.
> >>
> >>   From what I remember, in perl if you use "use strict;" it requires to
> >>  to define your variables (my) before using them. If you make a
> >>  variable typo in your code, then you'll trigger an error when you try
> >>  to run it.
> >>
> >>   From what I've seen of php, even with using strict error reporting,
> >>  you can do that all day long without generating an error.
> >>
> >>  So the answer appears to be "No, you can't do that in PHP." Is 
> >>that the answer?
> >
> >You can do anything you want... :)
> 
> Rob:
> 
> Just to show that your words of wisdom don't go unnoticed, see here:
> 
> http://php1.net/oop/strict/
> 
> That's pretty slick.
> 
> Now if I only understood WT* you did, I would be a better programmer for it.

I used the magic methods __set() and __get() to facilitate error
handling. These methods fire when a property is not accessible. So when
the property does not exist these will fire. So first we init the
properties when we create an instance (I'll discuss this shortly)... to
init them we are setting them, this fires the __set() method... but
since we check the value of the private ___init property, we don't fire
an error in this instance. Future requests for the properties will not
incurr a hit to __set() or __get() as long as the property is defined.
If it is not defined then voila, the error fires and we die (we could do
anything such as fire an exception but I just die for the example).

With respect to initialization I use func_get_args() so that an
arbitrary number of parameters can be passed to the constructor. This is
useful since we don't know the number of properties. I also check if an
argument is an array. If it is an array then I treat it as a property
with an initialized value and create and set the property accordingly.

That's all there is to it.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: "use strict" or similar in PHP?

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:57 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:48 -0500, tedd wrote:
> > At 9:21 AM -0500 3/1/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > >On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 08:36 -0500, tedd wrote:
> > >>  The OP asked:
> > >>
> > >>  >Is there in PHP something like "use strict" from perl? I find it pretty
> > >>  >annoying to need to run script over and over again just to find out 
> > >> that I
> > >>  >made typo in variable name.
> > >>
> > >>  And I've been waiting for an answer myself, but I haven't seen one.
> > >>
> > >>   From what I remember, in perl if you use "use strict;" it requires to
> > >>  to define your variables (my) before using them. If you make a
> > >>  variable typo in your code, then you'll trigger an error when you try
> > >>  to run it.
> > >>
> > >>   From what I've seen of php, even with using strict error reporting,
> > >>  you can do that all day long without generating an error.
> > >>
> > >>  So the answer appears to be "No, you can't do that in PHP." Is 
> > >>that the answer?
> > >
> > >You can do anything you want... :)
> > 
> > Rob:
> > 
> > Just to show that your words of wisdom don't go unnoticed, see here:
> > 
> > http://php1.net/oop/strict/
> > 
> > That's pretty slick.
> > 
> > Now if I only understood WT* you did, I would be a better programmer for it.
> 
> I used the magic methods __set() and __get() to facilitate error
> handling. These methods fire when a property is not accessible. So when
> the property does not exist these will fire. So first we init the
> properties when we create an instance (I'll discuss this shortly)... to
> init them we are setting them, this fires the __set() method... but
> since we check the value of the private ___init property, we don't fire
> an error in this instance. Future requests for the properties will not
> incurr a hit to __set() or __get() as long as the property is defined.
> If it is not defined then voila, the error fires and we die (we could do
> anything such as fire an exception but I just die for the example).
> 
> With respect to initialization I use func_get_args() so that an
> arbitrary number of parameters can be passed to the constructor. This is
> useful since we don't know the number of properties. I also check if an
> argument is an array. If it is an array then I treat it as a property
> with an initialized value and create and set the property accordingly.
> 
> That's all there is to it.

Oh, I didn't bother, but if someone finds this at all useful, they could
use debug_backtrace() to walk the call stack and output the actual
source file and line number where the illegal property was requested.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread bruce
hi rob...

here's the issue in more detail..

i have multiple processes that are generated/created and run in a
simultaneous manner. each process wants to get XX number of files from the
same batch of files... assume i have a batch of 50,000 files. my issue is
how do i allow each of the processes to get their batch of unique files as
fast as possible. (the 50K number is an arbotrary number.. my project will
shrink/expand over time...

if i dump all the 50K files in the same dir, i can have a lock file that
would allow each process to sequentially read/write the lock file, and then
access the dir to get the XX files the process is needing. (each process is
just looking to get the next batch of files for processing. there's no
searching based on text in the name of the files. it's a kind of fifo queing
system) this approach could work, but it's basically sequential, and could
in theory get into race conditions regarding the lockfile.

i could also have the process that creates the files, throw the files in
some kind of multiple directory processes, where i split the 50K files into
separate dirs and somehow implement logic to allow the cient process to
fetch the files from the unique/separate dirs.. but this could get ugly.

so my issue is essentially how can i allow as close to simultaneous access
by client/child processes to a kind of FIFO of files...

whatever logic i create for this process, will also be used for the next
iteration of the project, where i get rid of the files.. and i use some sort
of database as the informational storage.

hopefully this provides a little more clarity.

thanks


-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 2:50 AM
To: bruce
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] file locking...


On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 21:46 -0800, bruce wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Got a bit of a question/issue that I'm trying to resolve. I'm asking this
of
> a few groups so bear with me.
>
> I'm considering a situation where I have multiple processes running, and
> each process is going to access a number of files in a dir. Each process
> accesses a unique group of files, and then writes the group of files to
> another dir. I can easily handle this by using a form of locking, where I
> have the processes lock/read a file and only access the group of files in
> the dir based on the  open/free status of the lockfile.
>
> However, the issue with the approach is that it's somewhat synchronous.
I'm
> looking for something that might be more asynchronous/parallel, in that
I'd
> like to have multiple processes each access a unique group of files from
the
> given dir as fast as possible.
>
> So.. Any thoughts/pointers/comments would be greatly appreciated. Any
> pointers to academic research, etc.. would be useful.

Threads? Or spawn off child processes. Maybe I'm not understanding your
issues well enough.

Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:09 -0800, bruce wrote:
> hi rob...
> 
> here's the issue in more detail..
> 
> i have multiple processes that are generated/created and run in a
> simultaneous manner. each process wants to get XX number of files from the
> same batch of files... assume i have a batch of 50,000 files. my issue is
> how do i allow each of the processes to get their batch of unique files as
> fast as possible. (the 50K number is an arbotrary number.. my project will
> shrink/expand over time...
> 
> if i dump all the 50K files in the same dir, i can have a lock file that
> would allow each process to sequentially read/write the lock file, and then
> access the dir to get the XX files the process is needing. (each process is
> just looking to get the next batch of files for processing. there's no
> searching based on text in the name of the files. it's a kind of fifo queing
> system) this approach could work, but it's basically sequential, and could
> in theory get into race conditions regarding the lockfile.
> 
> i could also have the process that creates the files, throw the files in
> some kind of multiple directory processes, where i split the 50K files into
> separate dirs and somehow implement logic to allow the cient process to
> fetch the files from the unique/separate dirs.. but this could get ugly.
> 
> so my issue is essentially how can i allow as close to simultaneous access
> by client/child processes to a kind of FIFO of files...
> 
> whatever logic i create for this process, will also be used for the next
> iteration of the project, where i get rid of the files.. and i use some sort
> of database as the informational storage.
> 
> hopefully this provides a little more clarity.

Would I be right in assuming that a process grabs X of the oldest
available files and then begins to work on them. Then the next process
would essentially grab the next X oldest files so on and so forth over
and over again? Also is the file discarded once processed? Would I be
correct in presuming that processing of the files takes longer than
grabbing the files wanted? If so then I would have a single lock upon
which all processes wait. Each process grabs the lock when it can and
then moves X oldest files to a working directory where it can then
process them.

So... directory structure:

/ROOT
/ROOT/queue
/ROOT/work

Locks...

/ROOT/lock
  
So let's say you have 500 files:

/ROOT/queue/file_001.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_002.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_003.dat
...
/ROOT/queue/file_499.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_500.dat

And you have 5 processes... 

/proc/1
/proc/2
/proc/3
/proc/4
/proc/5

Now to start all processes try to grab the lock at the same time, by
virtue of lock mechanics only one process gets the lock... let's say for
instance 4 While 4 has the lock all the other processes go to sleep
for say... 1 usecs... upon failing to get the lock.

So process 4 transfers file_001.dat through to file_050.dat
into /ROOT/work.

/ROOT/work/file_001.dat
/ROOT/work/file_002.dat
/ROOT/work/file_003.dat
...
/ROOT/work/file_049.dat
/ROOT/work/file_050.dat

Then it releases the lock and begins processing meanwhile the other
processes wake up and try to grab the lock again... this time PID 2 gets
it. It does the same...

/ROOT/work/file_043.dat
/ROOT/work/file_044.dat
/ROOT/work/file_045.dat
...
/ROOT/work/file_049.dat
/ROOT/work/file_100.dat

/ROOT/queue/file_101.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_102.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_103.dat
...
/ROOT/queue/file_499.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_500.dat

Now while it was doing that PID 4 finished and all it's files are now
deleted. The first thing it does is try to get the lock so it can get
more... but it's still owned by PID 2 so PID 4 goes to sleep. Once PID 2
gets it's files it releases the lock and off it goes and the cycle
continued. Now there's still an issue with respect to incoming partially
written files. During the incoming process those should be written
elsewhere... lets say /ROOT/incoming. Once writing of the file is
complete it can be moved to /ROOT/queue. Also if you don't want
processes to delete the files you can have yet another
directory /ROOT/processed. So with everything considered here's your
directory structure:

/ROOT
/ROOT/incoming
/ROOT/processed
/ROOT/queue
/ROOT/work

One last thing to consider is that if there are no available files on
which to work then you might have your processes sleep a little longer.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread bruce
hi rob...

what you have written is similar to my initial approach... my question, and
the reason for posting this to a few different groups.. is to see if someone
has pointers/thoughts for something much quicker...

this is going to handle processing requests from client apps to a
webservice.. the backend of the service has to quickly process the files in
the dir as fast as possible to return the data to the web client query...

thanks



-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:54 AM
To: bruce
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] file locking...


On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:09 -0800, bruce wrote:
> hi rob...
>
> here's the issue in more detail..
>
> i have multiple processes that are generated/created and run in a
> simultaneous manner. each process wants to get XX number of files from the
> same batch of files... assume i have a batch of 50,000 files. my issue is
> how do i allow each of the processes to get their batch of unique files as
> fast as possible. (the 50K number is an arbotrary number.. my project will
> shrink/expand over time...
>
> if i dump all the 50K files in the same dir, i can have a lock file that
> would allow each process to sequentially read/write the lock file, and
then
> access the dir to get the XX files the process is needing. (each process
is
> just looking to get the next batch of files for processing. there's no
> searching based on text in the name of the files. it's a kind of fifo
queing
> system) this approach could work, but it's basically sequential, and could
> in theory get into race conditions regarding the lockfile.
>
> i could also have the process that creates the files, throw the files in
> some kind of multiple directory processes, where i split the 50K files
into
> separate dirs and somehow implement logic to allow the cient process to
> fetch the files from the unique/separate dirs.. but this could get ugly.
>
> so my issue is essentially how can i allow as close to simultaneous access
> by client/child processes to a kind of FIFO of files...
>
> whatever logic i create for this process, will also be used for the next
> iteration of the project, where i get rid of the files.. and i use some
sort
> of database as the informational storage.
>
> hopefully this provides a little more clarity.

Would I be right in assuming that a process grabs X of the oldest
available files and then begins to work on them. Then the next process
would essentially grab the next X oldest files so on and so forth over
and over again? Also is the file discarded once processed? Would I be
correct in presuming that processing of the files takes longer than
grabbing the files wanted? If so then I would have a single lock upon
which all processes wait. Each process grabs the lock when it can and
then moves X oldest files to a working directory where it can then
process them.

So... directory structure:

/ROOT
/ROOT/queue
/ROOT/work

Locks...

/ROOT/lock

So let's say you have 500 files:

/ROOT/queue/file_001.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_002.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_003.dat
...
/ROOT/queue/file_499.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_500.dat

And you have 5 processes...

/proc/1
/proc/2
/proc/3
/proc/4
/proc/5

Now to start all processes try to grab the lock at the same time, by
virtue of lock mechanics only one process gets the lock... let's say for
instance 4 While 4 has the lock all the other processes go to sleep
for say... 1 usecs... upon failing to get the lock.

So process 4 transfers file_001.dat through to file_050.dat
into /ROOT/work.

/ROOT/work/file_001.dat
/ROOT/work/file_002.dat
/ROOT/work/file_003.dat
...
/ROOT/work/file_049.dat
/ROOT/work/file_050.dat

Then it releases the lock and begins processing meanwhile the other
processes wake up and try to grab the lock again... this time PID 2 gets
it. It does the same...

/ROOT/work/file_043.dat
/ROOT/work/file_044.dat
/ROOT/work/file_045.dat
...
/ROOT/work/file_049.dat
/ROOT/work/file_100.dat

/ROOT/queue/file_101.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_102.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_103.dat
...
/ROOT/queue/file_499.dat
/ROOT/queue/file_500.dat

Now while it was doing that PID 4 finished and all it's files are now
deleted. The first thing it does is try to get the lock so it can get
more... but it's still owned by PID 2 so PID 4 goes to sleep. Once PID 2
gets it's files it releases the lock and off it goes and the cycle
continued. Now there's still an issue with respect to incoming partially
written files. During the incoming process those should be written
elsewhere... lets say /ROOT/incoming. Once writing of the file is
complete it can be moved to /ROOT/queue. Also if you don't want
processes to delete the files you can have yet another
directory /ROOT/processed. So with everything considered here's your
directory structure:

/ROOT
/ROOT/incoming

RE: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 10:05 -0800, bruce wrote:
> hi rob...
> 
> what you have written is similar to my initial approach... my question, and
> the reason for posting this to a few different groups.. is to see if someone
> has pointers/thoughts for something much quicker...
> 
> this is going to handle processing requests from client apps to a
> webservice.. the backend of the service has to quickly process the files in
> the dir as fast as possible to return the data to the web client query...

Then use a database to process who gets what. DB queries will queue up
while a lock is in place so batches will occur on first come first
served basis. I had thought this was for a background script. This will
save your script from having to browse the filesystem files, sort by
age, etc. Instead put an index on the ID of the file and grab the X
lowest IDs.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] file locking...

2009-03-01 Thread Stuart
2009/3/1 Robert Cummings 

> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 10:05 -0800, bruce wrote:
> > hi rob...
> >
> > what you have written is similar to my initial approach... my question,
> and
> > the reason for posting this to a few different groups.. is to see if
> someone
> > has pointers/thoughts for something much quicker...
> >
> > this is going to handle processing requests from client apps to a
> > webservice.. the backend of the service has to quickly process the files
> in
> > the dir as fast as possible to return the data to the web client query...
>
> Then use a database to process who gets what. DB queries will queue up
> while a lock is in place so batches will occur on first come first
> served basis. I had thought this was for a background script. This will
> save your script from having to browse the filesystem files, sort by
> age, etc. Instead put an index on the ID of the file and grab the X
> lowest IDs.


A database would be the best way to do this, but I've need to handle this
situation with files in the past and this is the solution I came up with...

1) Get the next filename to process
2) Try to move it to /tmp/whatever.
3) Check to see if /tmp/whatever. exists, and if it does process it
then delete it or move it to an archive directory
4) Repeat until there are no files left to process

I have this running on a server that processes several million files a day
without any issues.

For database-based queues I use a similar system but the move is replaced by
an update which sets the pid field of a single row. I then do a select where
that pid is my pid and process whatever comes back. I have several queues
that use this system and combined they're handling 10's of millions of queue
items per day without any problems, with the advantage that I can scale
across servers as well as processes.

-Stuart

-- 
http://stut.net/


Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread German Geek
Also check this one out: google uses it in gmail:
http://code.google.com/p/jquery-multifile-plugin/downloads/detail?name=multiple-file-upload.zip&can=2&q=

Cheers,
Tim
Tim-Hinnerk Heuer

http://www.ihostnz.com
Groucho Marx  - "I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't
it."

2009/3/2 tedd 

> At 4:17 PM +0200 3/1/09, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
>
>> There is no need to go that far, try to google a bit about swfupload.
>>
>> In short, this is a flash & javascript component that give's you the
>> ability to maintain the upload, get the current speed, get the current
>> amount of uploaded data, etc. It is very simple and works like a charm on a
>> dedi server. There are some issues on shared server sometimes, but even
>> these things are not that much complicated and can be easily solved.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>
>
> Nitsan
>
> Oh yeah, try this:
>
> http://swfupload.org/documentation/demonstration
>
> and go through the "up" link -- and then try the "See it in action!" link
> and also try the "Demonstration" link. You can even use the
> demo.swfupload.org link, which will provide you with this:
>
> http://demo.swfupload.org/v220beta5/index.htm
>
> All of which is well worth the effort if you're trying to waste your time.
> If their code is as good as their web site, no thanks -- I'll pass.
>
> But if I was to seriously investigate it, I would go directly to Google:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/
>
> However, I haven't a clue as to if it works or not.
>
> Cheers,
>
> tedd
>
>
> --
> ---
> http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread mike
you can use gears pretty easily to make a seamless multiple file
upload now. it's all javascript too so you can make it look how you
want, behave how you want, etc. without having to buy/tweak flash
code.


On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM, German Geek  wrote:
> Also check this one out: google uses it in gmail:
> http://code.google.com/p/jquery-multifile-plugin/downloads/detail?name=multiple-file-upload.zip&can=2&q=
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
> Tim-Hinnerk Heuer
>
> http://www.ihostnz.com
> Groucho Marx  - "I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't
> it."
>
> 2009/3/2 tedd 
>
>> At 4:17 PM +0200 3/1/09, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
>>
>>> There is no need to go that far, try to google a bit about swfupload.
>>>
>>> In short, this is a flash & javascript component that give's you the
>>> ability to maintain the upload, get the current speed, get the current
>>> amount of uploaded data, etc. It is very simple and works like a charm on a
>>> dedi server. There are some issues on shared server sometimes, but even
>>> these things are not that much complicated and can be easily solved.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nitsan
>>
>> Oh yeah, try this:
>>
>> http://swfupload.org/documentation/demonstration
>>
>> and go through the "up" link -- and then try the "See it in action!" link
>> and also try the "Demonstration" link. You can even use the
>> demo.swfupload.org link, which will provide you with this:
>>
>> http://demo.swfupload.org/v220beta5/index.htm
>>
>> All of which is well worth the effort if you're trying to waste your time.
>> If their code is as good as their web site, no thanks -- I'll pass.
>>
>> But if I was to seriously investigate it, I would go directly to Google:
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/
>>
>> However, I haven't a clue as to if it works or not.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> tedd
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
>>
>> --
>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>
>

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] 500 Internal Server Error

2009-03-01 Thread VamVan
Hello All,

What is the situation when we get internal server error 500 on PHP pages?

>From Internet I got some info like, you get it when :

1) If friendly urls are not supported by apache.(mod_rewrite)
2) If max_execution_time max's out.
and some more related to apache.

I got a weird situation where I do PHP eval() and if the parsed string is
wrong, I get internal server error 500.

So question is I was under the impression that PHP code errors  will never
result in a http response errors. Am I completely wrong here? Can anyone
tell me from their experience what are the specific scenarios we get this
error?

Thanks,
V


Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread tedd

At 12:13 PM -0800 3/1/09, mike wrote:

you can use gears pretty easily to make a seamless multiple file
upload now. it's all javascript too so you can make it look how you
want, behave how you want, etc. without having to buy/tweak flash
code.


On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM, German Geek  wrote:

 Also check this one out: google uses it in gmail:
 > 
http://code.google.com/p/jquery-multifile-plugin/downloads/detail?name=multiple-file-upload.zip&can=2&q=


Understood, but I don't think either of these do what the OP wanted, 
whcih was a real time file upload progress bar.


Cheers,

tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] 500 Internal Server Error

2009-03-01 Thread 9el
---
Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
www.ubuntu.com
--


On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, VamVan  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> What is the situation when we get internal server error 500 on PHP pages?
>
> From Internet I got some info like, you get it when :
>
> 1) If friendly urls are not supported by apache.(mod_rewrite)
> 2) If max_execution_time max's out.
> and some more related to apache.
>
> I got a weird situation where I do PHP eval() and if the parsed string is
> wrong, I get internal server error 500.
>
> So question is I was under the impression that PHP code errors  will never
> result in a http response errors. Am I completely wrong here? Can anyone
> tell me from their experience what are the specific scenarios we get this
> error?

Understandably  2)  for the eval.




>
>
> Thanks,
> V
>


Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread mike
gears will allow you to do that, more or less. i have it going...

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:34 PM, tedd  wrote:
> At 12:13 PM -0800 3/1/09, mike wrote:
>>
>> you can use gears pretty easily to make a seamless multiple file
>> upload now. it's all javascript too so you can make it look how you
>> want, behave how you want, etc. without having to buy/tweak flash
>> code.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM, German Geek  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Also check this one out: google uses it in gmail:
>>
>>  >
>> http://code.google.com/p/jquery-multifile-plugin/downloads/detail?name=multiple-file-upload.zip&can=2&q=
>
> Understood, but I don't think either of these do what the OP wanted, whcih
> was a real time file upload progress bar.
>
> Cheers,
>
> tedd
> --
> ---
> http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
>

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread Gevorg Harutyunyan
Thank you all for your help!

I tried to do without being dependent from flash, but as I see there are
only two ways for this: "flash" and "loading without tracking percentage". I
choose second way :)

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:58 AM, mike  wrote:

> gears will allow you to do that, more or less. i have it going...
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:34 PM, tedd  wrote:
> > At 12:13 PM -0800 3/1/09, mike wrote:
> >>
> >> you can use gears pretty easily to make a seamless multiple file
> >> upload now. it's all javascript too so you can make it look how you
> >> want, behave how you want, etc. without having to buy/tweak flash
> >> code.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM, German Geek  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Also check this one out: google uses it in gmail:
> >>
> >>  >
> >>
> http://code.google.com/p/jquery-multifile-plugin/downloads/detail?name=multiple-file-upload.zip&can=2&q=
> >
> > Understood, but I don't think either of these do what the OP wanted,
> whcih
> > was a real time file upload progress bar.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > tedd
> > --
> > ---
> > http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
> >
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Gevorg Harutyunyan


Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com

2009-03-01 Thread mike
I have a basic demo here. The code is not at it's best, you have to
hit reload to upload a new file.

http://mikehost.com/~mike/tmp/u/

It does show you though with some javascript trickery and some math
you can derive estimated time and approximate speed. I did have an
example of multiple files too (I don't think this one supports that)

At some point I'll publish all the components required and clean it up nicely.

I also have an nginx module to complement it that should be available
soon, to alleviate the need for the PHP processing piece (even though
it does work like a charm)


On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Gevorg Harutyunyan  wrote:
> Thank you all for your help!
>
> I tried to do without being dependent from flash, but as I see there are
> only two ways for this: "flash" and "loading without tracking percentage". I
> choose second way :)
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:58 AM, mike  wrote:
>>
>> gears will allow you to do that, more or less. i have it going...
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:34 PM, tedd  wrote:
>> > At 12:13 PM -0800 3/1/09, mike wrote:
>> >>
>> >> you can use gears pretty easily to make a seamless multiple file
>> >> upload now. it's all javascript too so you can make it look how you
>> >> want, behave how you want, etc. without having to buy/tweak flash
>> >> code.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM, German Geek  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>  Also check this one out: google uses it in gmail:
>> >>
>> >>  >
>> >>
>> >> http://code.google.com/p/jquery-multifile-plugin/downloads/detail?name=multiple-file-upload.zip&can=2&q=
>> >
>> > Understood, but I don't think either of these do what the OP wanted,
>> > whcih
>> > was a real time file upload progress bar.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > tedd
>> > --
>> > ---
>> > http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
>> >
>>
>> --
>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Gevorg Harutyunyan
>

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] PHP-based forum software ideas

2009-03-01 Thread mike
I'm looking around and usually wikipedia has a complete list of everything...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software_(PHP)

Anything missing there?

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: Browser timeout

2009-03-01 Thread Ondrej Kulaty
40 seconds is not very long execution time for timeout, if you have some 
loop in the script, try to output a dot character, for example, on every 
iteration, with flush() immediately after echo (or whatever command you use 
for sending output).

""? ""  pí¹e v diskusním pøíspìvku 
news:907722000902270633j559478cdi1ff0f1c7fc07...@mail.gmail.com...
> Hello, I am running a script that process the user's request, which 
> usually
> takes about 40 seconds. The problem is that on Internet Explorer 6, it
> timeouts - probably because no response was sent.
> How do I solve this problem? Since I tried some things and header()
> messages, nothing worked.
> 



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php