[PHP-BUG] Req #63668 [NEW]: Unable to replicate method signature if the method uses "self"

2012-12-02 Thread dev at jurajsplayground dot com
From: dev at jurajsplayground dot com
Operating system: Linux/GNU
PHP version:  5.4.9
Package:  Reflection related
Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Bug description:Unable to replicate method signature if the method uses "self"

Description:

I was trying to mock a ZF class using PHPUnit which has a method that hints
a 
parameter as "self" rather than using the class name. 
ReflectionParameter::getClass() returns the correct class name, however,
there 
is no way to find out that the actual method signature used "self" rather
than 
the class name.

See:
https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/phpunit-mock-objects/issues/107
https://github.com/zendframework/zf2/issues/2977

While this behaviour is expected, using echo() on the parameters outputs 
"Parameter #0 [  self $merge ]" (we can see it's not "Config" but

"self") while using getClass() returns the "self" turned into
ReflectionClass. 
Could another method be added to ReflectionParameter that returns the raw
"type 
hint", i.e. "self" so that method's signature can be properly replicated
for 
testing?

Test script:
---
class Config {
public function merge(self $merge){
}
}

$ref = new ReflectionMethod("Config", "merge");
echo current($ref->getParameters()) , " ",
current($ref->getParameters())->getClass()->name;


-- 
Edit bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63668&edit=1
-- 
Try a snapshot (PHP 5.4):   
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=trysnapshot54
Try a snapshot (PHP 5.3):   
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=trysnapshot53
Try a snapshot (trunk): 
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=trysnapshottrunk
Fixed in SVN:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=fixed
Fixed in release:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=alreadyfixed
Need backtrace: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=needtrace
Need Reproduce Script:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=needscript
Try newer version:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=oldversion
Not developer issue:https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=support
Expected behavior:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=notwrong
Not enough info:
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=notenoughinfo
Submitted twice:
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=submittedtwice
register_globals:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=globals
PHP 4 support discontinued: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=php4
Daylight Savings:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=dst
IIS Stability:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=isapi
Install GNU Sed:https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=gnused
Floating point limitations: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=float
No Zend Extensions: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=nozend
MySQL Configuration Error:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63668&r=mysqlcfg



Bug #45910 [Com]: Cannot declare self-referencing constant

2012-12-02 Thread semnanweb at gmail dot com
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45910&edit=1

 ID: 45910
 Comment by: semnanweb at gmail dot com
 Reported by:s dot tretter at szene1 dot at
 Summary:Cannot declare self-referencing constant
 Status: Closed
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Scripting Engine problem
 Operating System:   Linux
 PHP Version:5.3.0alpha1
 Assigned To:dmitry
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

same problem on php 5.4.8 apc 1.3.13

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13272981/cannot-declare-self-referencing-constant/

the bugs for apc. but i need apc. i must restart apache for working sometimes 
and then same error. restart after some times error and etc ... :(


Previous Comments:

[2008-08-26 08:38:45] dmi...@php.net

This bug has been fixed in CVS.

Snapshots of the sources are packaged every three hours; this change
will be in the next snapshot. You can grab the snapshot at
http://snaps.php.net/.
 
Thank you for the report, and for helping us make PHP better.




[2008-08-25 19:58:46] fel...@php.net

I've added two tests (bug45910.phpt, bug45910_2.phpt), the latter segfaults. 
(5_3 and HEAD)


[2008-08-25 19:28:11] fel...@php.net

Here's a simple script based in your example:

class foo {
const AAA = 'x';
const BBB = 'a';
const CCC = 'a';
const DDD = self::AAA;

private static $foo = array(
self::BBB   => 'a',
self::CCC   => 'b',
self::DDD   =>  self::AAA
);

public static function test() {
self::$foo;
}
}

foo::test();

The error is only issued when BBB and CCC contains same value.


[2008-08-25 18:34:38] s dot tretter at szene1 dot at

okay here a test script...
 array(
self::CONTENT_AD=> 
'n64',
self::CONTENT_AD_MAIN   => 
'n63',
self::CONTENT_AD_SALE   => 
'n65',
self::SKYSCRAPER=> 
'n62',
self::SITEBAR   => 
'n66',
self::BIGSIZE_BANNER=> 
'n61',
self::HOCKEY1_SKYSCRAPER
=> 'n62',
self::HOCKEY2_BIGSIZE_BANNER=> 
'n61',
self::SPECIAL_FOTO_SKYSCRAPER   => 
'n67',
self::CONTENT_USERPAGE  => 
self::NOSHOW
)
);

public static $objects = array();

public static function addElement($object)
{
self::$objects[] = $object;
}

}

Test::addElement("socha");
?>


[2008-08-25 18:10:42] s dot tretter at szene1 dot at

Description:

The problem is that the same script worked in php5.2.6, but in php5.3 it 
results in a "Fatal error: Cannot declare self-referencing constant 'n61' in 
..."

There is an array that uses many constants to set the array with values. If I 
execute a method of the class this error message stops the execution..but the 
line of the code has nothing todo with this array! strange error... just let me 
send my test code, u will see it yourself.
If i modify the array, remove the lines that php is complain about, some lines 
and so on.. it works.. but these lines are not differnt to the ohter lines..!? 
I don't understand it.

Also tried with latest cvs snapshot

Reproduce code:
---
I have a test script, but I don't wanna publish the code... May I send it 
directly to a php developer?

Expected result:

like in php5.2.6 this code should work!

Actual result:
--
Fatal error: Cannot declare self-referencing constant 'n61' in //test.php 
on line 132







-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45910&edit=1


Bug #63646 [Wfx]: Trait method names matching classes that use said trait treated as constructors

2012-12-02 Thread phpbugs at catchall dot drarok dot com
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63646&edit=1

 ID: 63646
 User updated by:phpbugs at catchall dot drarok dot com
 Reported by:phpbugs at catchall dot drarok dot com
 Summary:Trait method names matching classes that use said
 trait treated as constructors
 Status: Wont fix
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Scripting Engine problem
 Operating System:   OS X 10.8
 PHP Version:master-Git-2012-11-29 (Git)
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

@nikic: precisely what I was thinking!


Previous Comments:

[2012-12-01 12:19:10] ni...@php.net

@laruence: On the other hand, if you are using a namespaced class old-style 
constructors aren't used either. So the same might also be done with traits.


[2012-12-01 11:31:06] larue...@php.net

Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at
http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report
a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php

the method name same as class name is considered as constructor as of PHP 5.4 

although we encourage use __construct instead of that. but it should also be 
compatible


[2012-11-29 09:48:49] phpbugs at catchall dot drarok dot com

Description:

If you use a Trait which has a method name matching your class name, it is used 
as 
an old-style constructor in the case where the using class doesn't define a 
constructor.

If you *do* define a constructor, you receive the error "Fatal error: Hello has 
colliding constructor definitions coming from traits".

Test script:
---
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63646&edit=1


Req #54123 [Com]: Built-in LINQ-style query support for objects

2012-12-02 Thread id2639730 at gmail dot com
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54123&edit=1

 ID: 54123
 Comment by: id2639730 at gmail dot com
 Reported by:dave dot mulford at gmail dot com
 Summary:Built-in LINQ-style query support for objects
 Status: Open
 Type:   Feature/Change Request
 Package:*Database Functions
 Operating System:   Linux / Windows
 PHP Version:5.3.6RC1
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

+1 for this feature. I would like to have the support custom LINQ provider like 
c# LinqToSql, LinqToXML, etc...


Previous Comments:

[2011-02-28 21:23:54] dave dot mulford at gmail dot com

Description:

Having a php native LINQ-style of querying objects in PHP would make code more 
maintainable and readable. As of now, developers must loop through an array of 
objects and perform manual filtering, grouping, etc.

Here is a link to Microsoft's examples of using LINQ: 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vcsharp/aa336746







-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54123&edit=1


Req #54123 [Opn]: Built-in LINQ-style query support for objects

2012-12-02 Thread dave dot mulford at gmail dot com
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54123&edit=1

 ID: 54123
 User updated by:dave dot mulford at gmail dot com
 Reported by:dave dot mulford at gmail dot com
 Summary:Built-in LINQ-style query support for objects
 Status: Open
 Type:   Feature/Change Request
 Package:*Database Functions
 Operating System:   Linux / Windows
 PHP Version:5.3.6RC1
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

I had forgotten all about this request. If you're interested in trying it out, 
I 
have started a php LINQ project, called php-iq. Here is the github link for it: 
https://github.com/mw007/php-iq


Previous Comments:

[2012-12-02 14:25:28] id2639730 at gmail dot com

+1 for this feature. I would like to have the support custom LINQ provider like 
c# LinqToSql, LinqToXML, etc...


[2011-02-28 21:23:54] dave dot mulford at gmail dot com

Description:

Having a php native LINQ-style of querying objects in PHP would make code more 
maintainable and readable. As of now, developers must loop through an array of 
objects and perform manual filtering, grouping, etc.

Here is a link to Microsoft's examples of using LINQ: 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vcsharp/aa336746







-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54123&edit=1


Bug #63663 [Opn->Ana]: str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin characters

2012-12-02 Thread aharvey
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1

 ID: 63663
 Updated by: ahar...@php.net
 Reported by:kobrien at kiva dot org
 Summary:str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin
 characters
-Status: Open
+Status: Analyzed
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Strings related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.3.20-dev
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

This is due to the use of isalpha() internally, which doesn't play well with 
multibyte encodings like UTF-8, regardless of the locale setting.

Fundamentally, this is the same issue as bug #27668 — I'm not sure there's a 
lot we can do about this in PHP 5.x, but it's worth noting if and when we 
revisit Unicode string handling internally.


Previous Comments:

[2012-12-01 02:29:17] kobrien at kiva dot org

Description:

The function str_word_count() does work properly on non-latin characters. It 
will 
return a value of zero. Whereas str_word_count() works properly on latin 
characters and returns the value for the number of words in a string.

Test script:
---
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1


Bug #63663 [Ana]: str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin characters

2012-12-02 Thread kobrien at kiva dot org
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1

 ID: 63663
 User updated by:kobrien at kiva dot org
 Reported by:kobrien at kiva dot org
 Summary:str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin
 characters
 Status: Analyzed
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Strings related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.3.20-dev
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

Thanks for the reply. Given your comments about the problems, would it be 
helpful 
for me to also file a feature request for newer versions of php to have a 
mb_str_word_count function which could properly handle this case? I haven't dug 
into the C code enough to understand why isalpha() fails on multibyte, but I'd 
have to imagine there is an alternative available that will handle multi-byte 
characters properly. I could potentially even create a patch if pointed in the 
right direction.


Previous Comments:

[2012-12-03 02:29:16] ahar...@php.net

This is due to the use of isalpha() internally, which doesn't play well with 
multibyte encodings like UTF-8, regardless of the locale setting.

Fundamentally, this is the same issue as bug #27668 — I'm not sure there's a 
lot we can do about this in PHP 5.x, but it's worth noting if and when we 
revisit Unicode string handling internally.


[2012-12-01 02:29:17] kobrien at kiva dot org

Description:

The function str_word_count() does work properly on non-latin characters. It 
will 
return a value of zero. Whereas str_word_count() works properly on latin 
characters and returns the value for the number of words in a string.

Test script:
---
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1


Bug #63663 [Ana]: str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin characters

2012-12-02 Thread aharvey
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1

 ID: 63663
 Updated by: ahar...@php.net
 Reported by:kobrien at kiva dot org
 Summary:str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin
 characters
 Status: Analyzed
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Strings related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.3.20-dev
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

Yeah, a feature request for mb_str_word_count() might be a good idea.

The isalpha() issue isn't really PHP specific: the underlying C function simply 
takes a single byte as its input, so it can't ascertain whether a multibyte 
character is actually alphanumeric or not (since it only ever gets the first 
byte of the sequence). There's an iswalpha() function that would do the right 
thing, but PHP was written before it was widely available, and using it in 
str_word_count() alone would be inconsistent with the rest of the language: 
it's something we'd need to think about as part of making the whole language 
more multibyte-aware.


Previous Comments:

[2012-12-03 02:36:37] kobrien at kiva dot org

Thanks for the reply. Given your comments about the problems, would it be 
helpful 
for me to also file a feature request for newer versions of php to have a 
mb_str_word_count function which could properly handle this case? I haven't dug 
into the C code enough to understand why isalpha() fails on multibyte, but I'd 
have to imagine there is an alternative available that will handle multi-byte 
characters properly. I could potentially even create a patch if pointed in the 
right direction.


[2012-12-03 02:29:16] ahar...@php.net

This is due to the use of isalpha() internally, which doesn't play well with 
multibyte encodings like UTF-8, regardless of the locale setting.

Fundamentally, this is the same issue as bug #27668 — I'm not sure there's a 
lot we can do about this in PHP 5.x, but it's worth noting if and when we 
revisit Unicode string handling internally.


[2012-12-01 02:29:17] kobrien at kiva dot org

Description:

The function str_word_count() does work properly on non-latin characters. It 
will 
return a value of zero. Whereas str_word_count() works properly on latin 
characters and returns the value for the number of words in a string.

Test script:
---
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1


[PHP-BUG] Req #63671 [NEW]: Create a mb_str_word_count() function which is multi-byte aware

2012-12-02 Thread kobrien at kiva dot org
From: kobrien at kiva dot org
Operating system: Ubuntu 12.04
PHP version:  5.5.0alpha1
Package:  *Unicode Issues
Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Bug description:Create a mb_str_word_count() function which is multi-byte aware

Description:

Create a mb_str_word_count() function which will properly handle counting
the 
number of words in string that contains multi-byte characters. This is
currently 
not possible with str_word_count() because of use of the isalpha() C
function 
which does not properly handle multi-byte characters.

As suggested by aharvey, this new function would replace usage of isalpha()
with 
iswalpha(). 

A naive (meaning no real knowledge of this or testing of it) patch would
look 
like:

diff --git a/ext/standard/string.c b/ext/standard/string.c
index 7a4ae2e..9ab6b5f 100644
--- a/ext/standard/string.c
+++ b/ext/standard/string.c
@@ -5202,7 +5202,7 @@ PHP_FUNCTION(str_word_count)
 
while (p < e) {
s = p;
-   while (p < e && (isalpha((unsigned char)*p) || (char_list
&& 
ch[(unsigned char)*p]) || *p == '\'' || *p == '-')) {
+   while (p < e && (iswalpha((unsigned char)*p) || (char_list
&& 
ch[(unsigned char)*p]) || *p == '\'' || *p == '-')) {
p++;
}
if (p > s) {


Test script:
---
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63671&edit=1
-- 
Try a snapshot (PHP 5.4):   
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=trysnapshot54
Try a snapshot (PHP 5.3):   
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=trysnapshot53
Try a snapshot (trunk): 
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=trysnapshottrunk
Fixed in SVN:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=fixed
Fixed in release:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=alreadyfixed
Need backtrace: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=needtrace
Need Reproduce Script:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=needscript
Try newer version:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=oldversion
Not developer issue:https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=support
Expected behavior:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=notwrong
Not enough info:
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=notenoughinfo
Submitted twice:
https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=submittedtwice
register_globals:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=globals
PHP 4 support discontinued: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=php4
Daylight Savings:   https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=dst
IIS Stability:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=isapi
Install GNU Sed:https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=gnused
Floating point limitations: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=float
No Zend Extensions: https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=nozend
MySQL Configuration Error:  https://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=63671&r=mysqlcfg



Bug #63663 [Ana]: str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin characters

2012-12-02 Thread kobrien at kiva dot org
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1

 ID: 63663
 User updated by:kobrien at kiva dot org
 Reported by:kobrien at kiva dot org
 Summary:str_word_count does not properly handle non-latin
 characters
 Status: Analyzed
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Strings related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.3.20-dev
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

Ok feature request filed here: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63671
First time doing that, so hopefully it's correctly filed.


Previous Comments:

[2012-12-03 02:47:28] ahar...@php.net

Yeah, a feature request for mb_str_word_count() might be a good idea.

The isalpha() issue isn't really PHP specific: the underlying C function simply 
takes a single byte as its input, so it can't ascertain whether a multibyte 
character is actually alphanumeric or not (since it only ever gets the first 
byte of the sequence). There's an iswalpha() function that would do the right 
thing, but PHP was written before it was widely available, and using it in 
str_word_count() alone would be inconsistent with the rest of the language: 
it's something we'd need to think about as part of making the whole language 
more multibyte-aware.


[2012-12-03 02:36:37] kobrien at kiva dot org

Thanks for the reply. Given your comments about the problems, would it be 
helpful 
for me to also file a feature request for newer versions of php to have a 
mb_str_word_count function which could properly handle this case? I haven't dug 
into the C code enough to understand why isalpha() fails on multibyte, but I'd 
have to imagine there is an alternative available that will handle multi-byte 
characters properly. I could potentially even create a patch if pointed in the 
right direction.


[2012-12-03 02:29:16] ahar...@php.net

This is due to the use of isalpha() internally, which doesn't play well with 
multibyte encodings like UTF-8, regardless of the locale setting.

Fundamentally, this is the same issue as bug #27668 — I'm not sure there's a 
lot we can do about this in PHP 5.x, but it's worth noting if and when we 
revisit Unicode string handling internally.


[2012-12-01 02:29:17] kobrien at kiva dot org

Description:

The function str_word_count() does work properly on non-latin characters. It 
will 
return a value of zero. Whereas str_word_count() works properly on latin 
characters and returns the value for the number of words in a string.

Test script:
---
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63663&edit=1


Req #54243 [Com]: Shorter syntax for closures

2012-12-02 Thread id2639730 at gmail dot com
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54243&edit=1

 ID: 54243
 Comment by: id2639730 at gmail dot com
 Reported by:anil at saog dot net
 Summary:Shorter syntax for closures
 Status: Suspended
 Type:   Feature/Change Request
 Package:*General Issues
 Operating System:   *
 PHP Version:Irrelevant
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

When do you plan to implement short syntax for closures?
+1 for c# lambda style. 
Ecmascript 6 short function syntax used this approach. Typescript language 
already using lambdas.
Zend Framework 2 and Symfony2 actively using closures to work with events.


Previous Comments:

[2012-04-11 14:55:49] johan...@php.net

One of the goals of PHP is to have a "verbose enough" syntax. Giving people 
ways to search for information if they don't understand it. With the current 
syntax people reading the code see the word "function" an can get an idea what 
this might be and have a term to put in a search engine.

On the other side sometimes that is changed, like with arrays, initially one 
had to use array() to build arrays, nowadays we have the $a = [ ]; as shortcut, 
so maybe we'll add a new syntax, but only in the long run, when we see that 
anonymous functions really are going mainstream.


[2012-04-11 09:38:34] ninzya at inbox dot lv

I'm sorry, Anil, but you did not convince me on readability of "Where($($a, $b, 
{$a == $b}))".

"Microsoft's way" to define closures in C# linq "Where((a,b) => a == b)", in my 
opinion, is far more readable. I read it as "a two argument function "(a,b)" 
which results ("=>") in a being equal b ("a == b") or whatever the logic is 
defined there. However you can not read "$($a, $b, {$a == $b})" as good as you 
read microsoft's code. To me, there are too much dollar characters and they 
make 
your eyes hurt when you try to really understand which token does the dollar 
sing really belong to. You definately don't want readers of your code to 
tokenize a lot when the goal is readability :-)


[2012-03-19 11:54:13] anil at saog dot net

Guys, please calm down. I have no idea why you write these comments in a heat 
but this issue is just a wishing. Also, readability is a non-objective property 
which generally differs person to person, but the "key" is "shorter means 
readable". By the way, did you ever inspect c# - linq syntax? 

C#   : ...Where((a,b) => a == b)
PHP  : ...Where(function($a, $b){ return $a == $b; })
MY   : ...Where($($a, $b, {$a == $b}))

readability? yes of course readability... so you think you are better than 
microsoft on readability?

If you do not agree of course it is okay just tell it (like a human) otherwise 
keep your ignoble and invaluable ideas to yourself.


[2012-03-19 11:13:20] ninzya at inbox dot lv

I think the proposed syntax is not readable at all. Rather it looks like you 
have 
been affected by a "wannabe jQuery inventor". How do you come up with a dollar 
sign being "readable"? How do you define "readable code"? If you read your 
code, 
you read it as "dollar, dollar, bracket, dollar, dollar... whatever, dollar". 
Is 
this what you call "readability"?

However I do agree that the "use()" clause of closures sometimes bloats the 
code a 
little bit, especially if the closure is importing a lot of variables from its 
context.


[2012-03-19 09:08:09] danko at very dot lv

Um, no, *that* is unreadable. The original syntax can easily be made readable 
if you do care:

$myObject->MyMethod(
'abc',
function ($a) use ($b) {
return $a == $b;
}
);

There you go. As readable as it gets - just add some newlines and tabs. On the 
other hand, a soup of brackets and dollar signs can't be readable regardless of 
formatting.




The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54243


-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54243&edit=1