On Fri, Oct 18, 2019, at 12:37, Ariadne Conill wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am one of the primary maintainers of Pleroma, a federated social
> networking application written in Elixir, which uses PostgreSQL in
> ways that may be considered outside the typical usage scenarios for
> PostgreSQL.
>
> Namely, we leverage JSONB heavily as a backing store for JSON-LD
> documents[1]. We also use JSONB in combination with Ecto's "embedded
> structs" to store things like user preferences.
>
> The fact that we can use JSONB to achieve our design goals is a
> testament to the flexibility PostgreSQL has.
>
> However, in the process of doing so, we have discovered a serious flaw
> in the way jsonb_set() functions, but upon reading through this
> mailing list, we have discovered that this flaw appears to be an
> intentional design.[2]
>
> A few times now, we have written migrations that do things like copy
> keys in a JSONB object to a new key, to rename them. These migrations
> look like so:
>
>update users set info=jsonb_set(info, '{bar}', info->'foo');
>
> Typically, this works nicely, except for cases where evaluating
> info->'foo' results in an SQL null being returned. When that happens,
> jsonb_set() returns an SQL null, which then results in data loss.[3]
>
> This is not acceptable. PostgreSQL is a database that is renowned for
> data integrity, but here it is wiping out data when it encounters a
> failure case. The way jsonb_set() should fail in this case is to
> simply return the original input: it should NEVER return SQL null.
>
> But hey, we've been burned by this so many times now that we'd like to
> donate a useful function to the commons, consider it a mollyguard for
> the real jsonb_set() function.
>
> create or replace function safe_jsonb_set(target jsonb, path
> text[], new_value jsonb, create_missing boolean default true) returns
> jsonb as $$
> declare
> result jsonb;
> begin
> result := jsonb_set(target, path, coalesce(new_value,
> 'null'::jsonb), create_missing);
> if result is NULL then
> return target;
> else
> return result;
> end if;
> end;
> $$ language plpgsql;
>
> This safe_jsonb_set() wrapper should not be necessary. PostgreSQL's
> own jsonb_set() should have this safety feature built in. Without it,
> using jsonb_set() is like playing russian roulette with your data,
> which is not a reasonable expectation for a database renowned for its
> commitment to data integrity.
>
> Please fix this bug so that we do not have to hack around this bug.
> It has probably ruined countless people's days so far. I don't want
> to hear about how the function is strict, I'm aware it is strict, and
> that strictness is harmful. Please fix the function so that it is
> actually safe to use.
>
> [1]: JSON-LD stands for JSON Linked Data. Pleroma has an "internal
> representation" that shares similar qualities to JSON-LD, so I use
> JSON-LD here as a simplification.
>
> [2]:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/qfkua9$2q0e$1...@blaine.gmane.org
>
> [3]: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/issues/1324 is an
> example of data loss induced by this issue.
>
> Ariadne
>
This should be directed towards the hackers list, too.
What will it take to change the semantics of jsonb_set()? MySQL implements safe
behavior here. It's a real shame Postgres does not. I'll offer a $200 bounty to
whoever fixes it. I'm sure it's destroyed more than $200 worth of data and
people's time by now, but it's something.
Kind regards,
--
Mark Felder
ports-secteam & portmgr alumni
f...@freebsd.org
