R: Re: License Question
Steve Crawford ha scritto > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:35 AM Jamie Specter wrote: > > ... > > I would love to use it in an Apache-licensed project but unfortunately, LGPL > licenses are not compatible with Apache 2.0. > ... > > Is there any chance the project can be dual-licensed with a permissive option > like MIT or BSD? ... > > > That is a question better suited for the psycopg2 developers: The psycopg developers are on this list. :) And we asked the OP to write here so that everybody could follow the discussion (initially he opened a bug report). federico
R: Re: License Question
Federico Di Gregorio ha scritto > Steve Crawford ha scritto > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:35 AM Jamie Specter > > wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > I would love to use it in an Apache-licensed project but unfortunately, > > LGPL licenses are not compatible with Apache 2.0. > > > ... > > > > > > Is there any chance the project can be dual-licensed with a permissive > > option like MIT or BSD? ... > > > > > > > > > That is a question better suited for the psycopg2 developers: > > > The psycopg developers are on this list. :) > > > And we asked the OP to write here so that everybody could follow the > discussion (initially he opened a bug report). > > > federico Obviously not on "general". Sorry for the noiose. :/ federico
