Re: [Pan-users] Please test replacement of gtkspell with gspell
On Tuesday, 13 August 2024 00:41:59 CEST Duncan wrote: > LOL. FWIW my brain is obviously elsewhere today; when reading the commits > I interpreted "post-ui" as one interprets "post-apocalyptic": post -> > after: ??after-ui?? and it just wasn't making sense! 😆 We all have these kind of moments > Seems to be working well; changed the ebuild dep, rebuilt pan which > properly pulled in the new dep, restarted pan, in this reply all the > expected non-usual words are red-underlined and it properly let me replace > my "apocolyptic" with "apocalyptic" above, so seems to be working as > expected both building and in-use. =:^) Cool. Thanks for the feedback All the best ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
[Pan-users] Trouble getting Pan release 0.160
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:19:47 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > I happy to announce the release of Pan 0.160 codename "Toresk" I seem to have hit a snag that's over my head. I run Fedora, currently fc40, updating it daily. I've been assuming that included updating Pan, which I check a couple times a day. But I now find rpm -q pan pan-0.149-4.fc38.x86_64 I asked why on the Fedora list, where I'm assured that the Fedora versions, if they exist, haven't been arriving. Porting anything to Fedora, if that's the term, is way beyond me. Can someone help? -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
Re: [Pan-users] Trouble getting Pan release 0.160
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:33:12 - (UTC) Beartooth via Pan-users wrote: > On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:19:47 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > > I happy to announce the release of Pan 0.160 codename "Toresk" > > I seem to have hit a snag that's over my head. I run Fedora, > currently fc40, updating it daily. I've been assuming that included > updating Pan, which I check a couple times a day. But I now find > > rpm -q pan pan-0.149-4.fc38.x86_64 > > I asked why on the Fedora list, where I'm assured that the > Fedora versions, if they exist, haven't been arriving. Porting > anything to Fedora, if that's the term, is way beyond me. Can someone > help? I think that Fedora decided to orphan Pan a while ago because the maintainer stopped maintaining it. I have been able to get it working on Fedora 40 up to pan-0.158, I build rpms locally from source using the Fedora .spec files slightly tweaked. Things have broken with pan-0.159 and pan-0.160, I think mostly because of the change from autotools to cmake. I have been working on pan-0.160 today but I can't get it working yet. If you would like the installable pan-0.158 rpms for Fedora 40 x86_64 then I can email them to you. You're looking at about 10.5MB including the debug rpms, so when encoded for email maybe 16-18MB. -- Brian Morrison "I am not young enough to know everything" Oscar Wilde ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
