Re: [opensource-dev] Request for review/testing Socks 5 support for viewer-development (VWR-20801)

2010-08-31 Thread Scruffy
Hi Robin,

It would be great if you could fix this (
http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SNOW-822) at the same time.  I use SL
through an authenticated web proxy and apart from that issue it works great.

Scruffy

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Robin Cornelius
wrote:

> As mentioned at Oz's OH yesterday, I would like to try to finish off
> the Socks 5 proxy work in the sprint about to start, my repository can
> be found at
>
> https://bitbucket.org/robincornelius/viewer-development-vwr-20801
>
> It is a few days out of date, and I will address that ASAP, but I am
> more concerned with the functionality of the core feature at this
> immediate stage to make sure it does what it says on the tin for
> everyone else. I've compiled on all 3 platforms ok but I've only
> tested currently on windows as my other boxes are having issues
> running the viewer (for various off topic reasons that i'm fixing when
> i get time)
>
> I started a test plan (also incomplete/outof date currently)
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1LM1EjS_RFzgR_3nkDkrpM8NMBuQaeJo7CDbp21fCE_Q&hl=en&authkey=CIjDl9sB
>
> The proxy supports the same feature set as the original implementation
> in Snowglobe 1.X, that is http traffic can be sent to a http proxy
> (web proxy setting) independent of the UDP trafic being sent to a
> socks 5 proxy. This provides combinations that allow
> http-texture/asset to be sent via squids (with appropriate store
> rewrite rule) to cache textures/assets. Access to these extra modes
> can be achieved by clicking the tool icon to the side of the socks
> proxy address/port field on preferences/network
>
> I believe this feature is a partial answer to the story  "As a
> Business User, I am sometimes unable to access SL at all from behind
> my company firewall. How do I work around this?" on the back log,
> clearly this only provides one method to work from behind a firewall
> and currently it does not address Voice at all. It is possible to
> proxy voice via socks 5 as well, but this requires other modifications
> that are outside the scope of this jira/feature, but is something I
> have done a functional proof of concept test on, i just need to find a
> clean solution that is acceptable and easy to use.
>
> Robin
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Down tools and play the "game" -- was Re: What was the point of display names?

2010-11-07 Thread Scruffy
Can we not have the whining about Display Names on here please?  It's
happening so get over it.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] OpenJPEG v2 progress update

2010-11-11 Thread Scruffy
If Phoenix is broken then use the official viewer to upload your sculpts.
What's hard about that?  Noone is stopping you running multiple viewers.

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:37 PM, GeneJ  wrote:

> I am a Mac user who builds and create sculpts.
>
> My last two months in SL have been horrid from a viewer standpoint. When
> the Phoenix viewer moved away from KDU, most Mac users lost the ability to
> upload sculpts in that viewer. I'm at least led to believe this IS an
> OpenJpg issue. (I don't consider it a bug, as I have at least formed an
> opionion that no one bothered to check for this functionality prior to
> release.)
>
>
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges