[opensource-dev] Building viewer-release on OS X.
Hi there, I am no novice to building the viewer on various platforms, but currently I am building the viewer on OS X (first time setting this up on OS X too) and have ran into a problem that I am having difficulty working out what the cause is. I am currently using LLVM-GCC-4.2 from xcode 4.6.2 on OS 10.8.5. Google hasn't been helpful in this regard either. Hopefully someone can give me some idea as to what the problem might be. I am currently building the viewer-release using: autobuild build -c ReleaseOS -- -DLL_TESTS:BOOL=NO -DENABLE_SIGNING:BOOL=FALSE -DRELEASE_CRASH_REPORTING:BOOL=FALSE -DNON_RELEASE_CRASH_REPORTING:BOOL=FALSE This usually gives me a basic build to ensure I have the basics down before I add anything like Kakadu or fmod to the mix. Unfortunately, I seem to be getting this obscure cmake error when I build: === BUILD AGGREGATE TARGET ZERO_CHECK OF PROJECT SecondLife WITH CONFIGURATION Release === Check dependencies PhaseScriptExecution "CMake Rules" /Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/build-darwin-i386/SecondLife.build/Release/ZERO_CHECK.build/Script-09EB84842EB64FD49F26A2EE.sh cd /Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/indra /bin/sh -c /Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/build-darwin-i386/SecondLife.build/Release/ZERO_CHECK.build/Script-09EB84842EB64FD49F26A2EE.sh echo "" make -f /Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/build-darwin-i386/CMakeScripts/ReRunCMake.make make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/build-darwin-i386/CMakeFiles/2.8.11.2/CMakeCCompiler.cmake', needed by `/Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/build-darwin-i386/CMakeFiles/cmake.check_cache'. Stop. make: *** [/Users/ashweststar/Source/viewer-release/build-darwin-i386/CMakeFiles/ZERO_CHECK] Error 2 Command /bin/sh failed with exit code 2 ** BUILD FAILED ** A full copy of my build log is available at: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/58565/log2.txt I was hoping someone might have more insight as to why this is happening. Thanks, Ash Qin ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Building viewer-release on OS X.
> Did you install Command Line Tools with Xcode and CMake? Yes. > (from your logs) > -- The C compiler identification is unknown > -- The CXX compiler identification is unknown That's only because I defined the CC and CXX environment variables to use LLVM-GCC through ccache using: export CXX=/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec/llvm-g++-4.2 export CC=/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec/llvm-gcc-4.2 This is because I am aware that viewer-release will not build under Clang. If you look in the build log, it uses those compilers fine. Also, no difference when not using ccache. > That's not good. :O I don't know why it states unknown. Ash ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Building viewer-release on OS X.
> Shouldn't need an environment variable. Xcodebuild is directed to use the > system's llvm-gcc I had tried already without ccache (and a clean build directory). What I hadn't tried though was not defining CXX and CC variables to LLVM. Surprisingly, I am able to compile the viewer now despite the deceptive message that autobuild is now using Clang. The confusing thing is that I can point the CXX and CC variables to the exact same compilers xcode is using and still get the exact same failure. This sort of behaviour leaves me a little miffed. Being that I would really like to use ccache in my work, would you happen to know of a way to tell xcode to use ccache + llvm in Second life's compilation process? > (just won't work on Xcode5, which you aren't using anyway, because Apple > symlinked "llvm-gcc" to clang. -_-) So, one could get xcode5 working by just changing the symlink to the right compiler? Thanks, Ash On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Cinder Biscuits wrote: > On 4 Oct 2013, at 8:32, Ash Qin wrote: > >>> Did you install Command Line Tools with Xcode and CMake? >> >> Yes. >> >>> (from your logs) >>> -- The C compiler identification is unknown >>> -- The CXX compiler identification is unknown >> >> That's only because I defined the CC and CXX environment variables to >> use LLVM-GCC through ccache using: >> >> export CXX=/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec/llvm-g++-4.2 >> export CC=/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec/llvm-gcc-4.2 >> >> This is because I am aware that viewer-release will not build under >> Clang. If you look in the build log, it uses those compilers fine. >> Also, no difference when not using ccache. > > Shouldn't need an environment variable. Xcodebuild is directed to use > the system's llvm-gcc > in Variables.cmake (just won't work on Xcode5, which you aren't using > anyway, because Apple > symlinked "llvm-gcc" to clang. -_-) > > Seems to me that CMake is confused as to where the C compiler is. You've > probably already tried > this, but nuke build-darwin-i386 and try again without ccache. > Something's likely stale. > > -- > Cinder > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Building viewer-release on OS X.
Just an update if anyone else is interested in using ccache on OS X. Replacing the symlinks used for compilers in /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/ to the ccache binary was sufficient to use ccache. I will say that I am not very big on the whole replacing of system files instead of using UNIX standard local paths for custom stuff, so if you are aware of alternate ways of doing this with local paths or environment variables, I'd appreciate hearing them. Ash On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ash Qin wrote: >> Shouldn't need an environment variable. Xcodebuild is directed to use the >> system's llvm-gcc > > I had tried already without ccache (and a clean build directory). What > I hadn't tried though was not defining CXX and CC variables to LLVM. > > Surprisingly, I am able to compile the viewer now despite the > deceptive message that autobuild is now using Clang. The confusing > thing is that I can point the CXX and CC variables to the exact same > compilers xcode is using and still get the exact same failure. > > This sort of behaviour leaves me a little miffed. Being that I would > really like to use ccache in my work, would you happen to know of a > way to tell xcode to use ccache + llvm in Second life's compilation > process? > >> (just won't work on Xcode5, which you aren't using anyway, because Apple >> symlinked "llvm-gcc" to clang. -_-) > > So, one could get xcode5 working by just changing the symlink to the > right compiler? > > Thanks, >Ash > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Cinder Biscuits > wrote: >> On 4 Oct 2013, at 8:32, Ash Qin wrote: >> >>>> Did you install Command Line Tools with Xcode and CMake? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> (from your logs) >>>> -- The C compiler identification is unknown >>>> -- The CXX compiler identification is unknown >>> >>> That's only because I defined the CC and CXX environment variables to >>> use LLVM-GCC through ccache using: >>> >>> export CXX=/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec/llvm-g++-4.2 >>> export CC=/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec/llvm-gcc-4.2 >>> >>> This is because I am aware that viewer-release will not build under >>> Clang. If you look in the build log, it uses those compilers fine. >>> Also, no difference when not using ccache. >> >> Shouldn't need an environment variable. Xcodebuild is directed to use >> the system's llvm-gcc >> in Variables.cmake (just won't work on Xcode5, which you aren't using >> anyway, because Apple >> symlinked "llvm-gcc" to clang. -_-) >> >> Seems to me that CMake is confused as to where the C compiler is. You've >> probably already tried >> this, but nuke build-darwin-i386 and try again without ccache. >> Something's likely stale. >> >> -- >> Cinder >> ___ >> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >> privileges ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
