[opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
I'm pissed off ! Here's why: http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1230 Henri. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
Hi Henri, I'm curious: why are you posting a link to this mailinglist about a 4+ year old incident? MartinRJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Henri Beauchamp Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 6:25 PM To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest... I'm pissed off ! Here's why: http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1230 Henri. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:40:16 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > Hi Henri, > I'm curious: > why are you posting a link to this mailinglist about a 4+ year old incident? It is 15 days old, not 4 years old... ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
Hehe, Henri, i really appreciate how you literally punch and kick everyone (especially those who deserve it), ofcourse you have a reason. Continue it, it makes me all <3 and ♥ 2013/6/1 Henri Beauchamp > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:40:16 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > > > Hi Henri, > > I'm curious: > > why are you posting a link to this mailinglist about a 4+ year old > incident? > > It is 15 days old, not 4 years old... > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
i see the confusion the date stamp for the message is all the way at the bottom left 2013-06-01 16:22:34 On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:40:16 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > > > Hi Henri, > > I'm curious: > > why are you posting a link to this mailinglist about a 4+ year old > incident? > > It is 15 days old, not 4 years old... > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > -- Robert L Martin ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
A suggestion: Move your code into a git or hg repository where credit is with each commit. Of course someone intent on taking without credit can diff the commit and apply without crediting the source. > > From: Henri Beauchamp >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com >Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 11:25 AM >Subject: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest... > > >I'm pissed off ! > >Here's why: http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1230 > >Henri. >___ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > > >___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
Ah! I misread the “joined” date on that forum page as the “posted” date, this happens all the time :D I’m sorry, last time that I’ve heard anything about Kirstenlee’s viewer was a couple of years ago, and S19 is also a couple of years old, as far as I can tell (and I’m pretty sure about that). See http://virtyou.com/viewer_track/ as a proof (Kirstenlee’s viewer “S20” was built in 2010). MartinRJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Henri Beauchamp Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 6:46 PM To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest... On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:40:16 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > Hi Henri, > I'm curious: > why are you posting a link to this mailinglist about a 4+ year old > incident? It is 15 days old, not 4 years old... ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
Thing is, Henri said Kirsten did just take his code to update his dead Viewer to make it compatible with stuff again without mentioning him in any way, going to far that (nearly) all traces of Henri are removed. 2013/6/1 Martin Fürholz > Ah! I misread the “joined” date on that forum page as the “posted” date, > this happens all the time :D > I’m sorry, last time that I’ve heard anything about Kirstenlee’s viewer was > a couple of years ago, and S19 is also a couple of years old, as far as I > can tell (and I’m pretty sure about that). See > http://virtyou.com/viewer_track/ as a proof (Kirstenlee’s viewer “S20” was > built in 2010). > MartinRJ > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > From: Henri Beauchamp > Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 6:46 PM > To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com > Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest... > > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:40:16 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > > > Hi Henri, > > I'm curious: > > why are you posting a link to this mailinglist about a 4+ year old > > incident? > > It is 15 days old, not 4 years old... > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:57:31 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > Ah! I misread the “joined” date on that forum page as the “posted” date, > this happens all the time :D > I’m sorry, last time that I’ve heard anything about Kirstenlee’s viewer was > a couple of years ago, and S19 is also a couple of years old, as far as I > can tell (and I’m pretty sure about that). See > http://virtyou.com/viewer_track/ as a proof (Kirstenlee’s viewer “S20” was > built in 2010). S20 is a v2 viewer, so it's obviously a different branch. It is quite possible that Kirsten used the Cool VL Viewer sources and the incremental patches I publish with every release to follow my progresses on it, but it's obviously the very same viewer with just a couple of patches added (a 600Kb diff is NOTHING, especially when you see what the changes are about in this diff... a i++ instead of a ++i is not significant a change !). In fact, I don't care if Kirsten forks my viewer, what I care about is that he obviously pretends being the person behind the 3000+ hours of coding *I* spent on this code over the 6+ years of continuous development ! If anyone got more to say about this matter, please let's move it to the Cool VL Viewer forum: I don't want to polute this list more than I already did (but I thought it was important to bring up such an issue). Henri. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Not all Open Source developers are honest...
Henri has been putting a considerable number of hours over several years into fixing bugs and making improvements, including into other people's viewers ! If what he says is true (and I have no doubt that it is since it is easy to verify), this kind of thing is totally unacceptable. TPV developers ought to behave exemplarily because users put their data into their hands and trust them not to mess around with it. When one dev misbehaves, it drops a shade of doubt on every other dev in the community. I sincerely hope this was a misstep. On 01/06/2013, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:57:31 +0200, Martin Fürholz wrote: > >> Ah! I misread the “joined” date on that forum page as the “posted” date, >> this happens all the time :D >> I’m sorry, last time that I’ve heard anything about Kirstenlee’s viewer >> was >> a couple of years ago, and S19 is also a couple of years old, as far as I >> can tell (and I’m pretty sure about that). See >> http://virtyou.com/viewer_track/ as a proof (Kirstenlee’s viewer “S20” was >> >> built in 2010). > > S20 is a v2 viewer, so it's obviously a different branch. > It is quite possible that Kirsten used the Cool VL Viewer sources and the > incremental patches I publish with every release to follow my progresses on > it, but it's obviously the very same viewer with just a couple of patches > added (a 600Kb diff is NOTHING, especially when you see what the changes > are about in this diff... a i++ instead of a ++i is not significant a > change !). > > In fact, I don't care if Kirsten forks my viewer, what I care about is that > he obviously pretends being the person behind the 3000+ hours of coding *I* > spent on this code over the 6+ years of continuous development ! > > If anyone got more to say about this matter, please let's move it to the > Cool VL Viewer forum: I don't want to polute this list more than I already > did (but I thought it was important to bring up such an issue). > > Henri. > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
