Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:14:10 +0100 Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > > Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late > > date. > > LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for > feedback if everything is already settled ?... That got to be a > (very bad) joke !!! This is exactly what you can and should expect from Linden Lab by now... When did they EVER really listen? -- Carlo Wood ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > >> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date. > LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for > feedback if everything is already settled ?... That got to be a > (very bad) joke !!! A small correction: The Lab never asked for feedback, as far as I can tell. What was said was (essentially), "We're changing these things, here's what can go wrong, this is the patch you should apply." I don't recall anyone asking for feedback. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:29:43 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote: > On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > > >> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date. > > LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for > > feedback if everything is already settled ?... That got to be a > > (very bad) joke !!! > A small correction: The Lab never asked for feedback, as far as I can > tell. What was said was (essentially), "We're changing these things, > here's what can go wrong, this is the patch you should apply." > > I don't recall anyone asking for feedback. Excepted that the patch is incomplete/non-functional and that feedback *is* requested on the Wiki page for Aditi inventory test region... See: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/InventoryBetaTest#Details Henri. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
On 11/02/2012 3:26 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:29:43 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote: > >> On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: >>> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: >>> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date. >>> LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for >>> feedback if everything is already settled ?... That got to be a >>> (very bad) joke !!! >> A small correction: The Lab never asked for feedback, as far as I can >> tell. What was said was (essentially), "We're changing these things, >> here's what can go wrong, this is the patch you should apply." >> >> I don't recall anyone asking for feedback. > Excepted that the patch is incomplete/non-functional and that > feedback *is* requested on the Wiki page for Aditi inventory > test region... > See: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/InventoryBetaTest#Details > > Henri. Only insofar as to whether it functions or fails to function for the test criteria, as far as I can see. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:21:03 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 3:26 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:29:43 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> >>>
> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date.
> >>> LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for
> >>> feedback if everything is already settled ?... That got to be a
> >>> (very bad) joke !!!
> >> A small correction: The Lab never asked for feedback, as far as I can
> >> tell. What was said was (essentially), "We're changing these things,
> >> here's what can go wrong, this is the patch you should apply."
> >>
> >> I don't recall anyone asking for feedback.
> > Excepted that the patch is incomplete/non-functional and that
> > feedback *is* requested on the Wiki page for Aditi inventory
> > test region...
> > See: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/InventoryBetaTest#Details
> >
> > Henri.
> Only insofar as to whether it functions or fails to function for the
> test criteria, as far as I can see.
OK... So let's be anal...
Quoting the Wiki ("***" highlightings are mine):
"Why: To help make Inventory more reliable and faster
How: ***However*** you can."
and:
"Testing will be as simple as rezzing objects and transferring them
between yourselves and others ***by any method you can imagine***."
and finally:
"File JIRAs for any issues you find ..."
If it's not a request for feedback, then I don't know what it is..
Granted, I didn't file a JIRA, but since the patch was posted here...
Now, if feedback and contributions are not welcome by LL, they could
as well close this list and close the sources of their viewer...
Henri.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/2012 10:31 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > "File JIRAs for any issues you find ..." > > If it's not a request for feedback, then I don't know what it is.. > > Granted, I didn't file a JIRA, but since the patch was posted > here... ^Yeah, that. The server folks don't monitor this list so posting feedback here when a Jira is in order is not going to get this issue attention in a timely manner. Oz's responsibility was to inform us of an impending change(s) to the inventory service but only the viewer side changes required for those service changes themselves are in his purview. If there is a problem with the either of the 2 changes to the inventory service, the product owner needs to know before this gets put in an RC, so file a Jira yesterday. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPNWnwAAoJEIdLfPRu7qE2cgkIAIl8HPKtTRrQfpnjuIkLr2rB oz8fJhLkSnSywo/CDxFX39eXdxsaRPRzpJtlQqpt8AX1wAN/ehS5Zh2aIVoiTFSX 1/SWhnJiQKso7Sg35uZAYPqVXUBRWL1ynYVfz5RVk7SyDjM/bJmh3qPNFoRdERsr UyNAcxYnYWxhksmdSYfjbc27wOoSJDDPYkGpKum8wi1v5A03fjFqej1jwQ4Ye7Wt mPZObr7FNCypr4cMUcKKAtWLlK3K4er0dngWRWr6BjCJnk6T3sJzMx8bkEJ9tgYb VIn4lvSx7ObbpaDEgV6v+IonblAKpo8ppzTZvuMmtFh6bE3le9ags4YQEcP8G5I= =cbNE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
