[opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate

2012-01-06 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that 
improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we 
found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly 
ordered.  With the new backend, that assumption does not always hold true.


Changeset d327dcc8ae51 
 
from viewer-development implements the viewer change needed to avoid 
race conditions.  It should be straightforward to apply to any viewer, 
and is safe to release before the changes are deployed (it is compatible 
with the services as they are now).


You are strongly urged to port this patch and get it deployed.

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate

2012-01-06 Thread Henri Beauchamp
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:15:58 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:

> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that 
> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we 
> found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly 
> ordered.  With the new backend, that assumption does not always hold true.
> 
> Changeset d327dcc8ae51 
>  
> from viewer-development implements the viewer change needed to avoid 
> race conditions.  It should be straightforward to apply to any viewer, 
> and is safe to release before the changes are deployed (it is compatible 
> with the services as they are now).
> 
> You are strongly urged to port this patch and get it deployed.

How urgent is it ?... Do we have days or weeks ?  Will there be any
testing ground available (e.g. on the beta grid or in some sandbox
on the main grid) ?...

"You are strongly urged" to provide more accurate details... ;-P

Thank you in advance.

Henri.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate

2012-01-06 Thread Jonathan Welch
If you do not have this patch there is a 50% chance that when you open
a box with an outfit and pick Copy and Wear not all items will be
worn. (If I have gotten these facts wrong please correct me Oz).

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Henri Beauchamp  wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:15:58 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
>> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
>> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
>> found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
>> ordered.  With the new backend, that assumption does not always hold true.
>>
>> Changeset d327dcc8ae51
>> 
>> from viewer-development implements the viewer change needed to avoid
>> race conditions.  It should be straightforward to apply to any viewer,
>> and is safe to release before the changes are deployed (it is compatible
>> with the services as they are now).
>>
>> You are strongly urged to port this patch and get it deployed.
>
> How urgent is it ?... Do we have days or weeks ?  Will there be any
> testing ground available (e.g. on the beta grid or in some sandbox
> on the main grid) ?...
>
> "You are strongly urged" to provide more accurate details... ;-P
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Henri.
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate

2012-01-06 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
On 2012-01-06 17:25, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:15:58 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
>> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
>> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
>> found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
>> ordered.  With the new backend, that assumption does not always hold true.
>>
>> Changeset d327dcc8ae51
>> 
>> from viewer-development implements the viewer change needed to avoid
>> race conditions.  It should be straightforward to apply to any viewer,
>> and is safe to release before the changes are deployed (it is compatible
>> with the services as they are now).
>>
>> You are strongly urged to port this patch and get it deployed.
> How urgent is it ?... Do we have days or weeks ?  Will there be any
> testing ground available (e.g. on the beta grid or in some sandbox
> on the main grid) ?...
>

I'm not sure of the exact deployment schedule - more than days, probably 
less than a month.

I believe that there is no known risk of inventory loss or damage 
without the patch, but it is true that some operations can result in 
accidental nudity, which some users might be unhappy about.

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate

2012-01-06 Thread Lance Corrimal
Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2012 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
> found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
> ordered.  With the new backend, that assumption does not always
> hold true.
> 
> Changeset d327dcc8ae51
>  cc8ae51> from viewer-development implements the viewer change
> needed to avoid race conditions.  It should be straightforward to
> apply to any viewer, and is safe to release before the changes are
> deployed (it is compatible with the services as they are now).
> 
> You are strongly urged to port this patch and get it deployed.

I am not amused:

usr/src/packages/BUILD/dolphinviewer3-
beta/indra/newview/llinventorymodel.cpp:463:8: error: prototype for 
'LLUUID LLInventoryModel::createNewCategory(const LLUUID&, 
LLFolderType::EType, const std::string&)' does not match any in class 
'LLInventoryModel'
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/dolphinviewer3-
beta/indra/newview/llinventorymodel.h:364:9: error: candidate is: 
LLUUID LLInventoryModel::createNewCategory(const LLUUID&, 
LLFolderType::EType, const std::string&, void (*)(const LLSD&, void*), 
void*)
make[2]: *** [newview/CMakeFiles/secondlife-
bin.dir/llinventorymodel.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [newview/CMakeFiles/secondlife-bin.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NI5LZ0 (%build)

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges