Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Adds support for packaging and extracting zip formatted archives

2011-10-14 Thread Nat Goodspeed

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/#review1053
---


Since I know this snapshot of the functionality isn't yet complete -- it 
doesn't have the bugfix from yesterday -- I'd like to see the composite diffs. 
Which resurfaces a question about which I've scratched my head before. How do 
you coax this tool to display all the differences between two repo clones, even 
if the changesets are discontiguous?

- Nat


On Oct. 13, 2011, 11:10 a.m., Alain Linden wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Oct. 13, 2011, 11:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Viewer, Oz Linden, Jenn, and Nat Goodspeed.
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
> These changes are to support packaging archives as zip files.  This is useful 
> when you are using autobuild to construct an archive that isn't really 
> intended to be used as an autobuild installable.  Internally autobuild can 
> handle tarballs on any platform, but if you are making a package for windows 
> and not installing with autobuild, it is better to use zip which is natively 
> supported.  Changes here do the following:
> 
> 1. enable the --archive-format option for autobuild package to choose the 
> format of the package.
> 2. add support for reading an 'archive' entry per platform with the new 
> 'format' element to select the archive format with the configuration file.
> 3. add new edit command 'autobuild edit archive' to add archive 
> configurations.
> 4. add support for installing zip formatted archives.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   autobuild/autobuild_tool_edit.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/autobuild_tool_package.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/common.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/configfile.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/tests/test_common.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/tests/test_package.py ac90b03614ea 
> 
> Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alain
> 
>

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Adds support for packaging and extracting zip formatted archives

2011-10-14 Thread Alain Linden

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/
---

(Updated Oct. 14, 2011, 9:32 a.m.)


Review request for Viewer, Oz Linden, Jenn, and Nat Goodspeed.


Changes
---

Included a few bug fixes.


Summary
---

These changes are to support packaging archives as zip files.  This is useful 
when you are using autobuild to construct an archive that isn't really intended 
to be used as an autobuild installable.  Internally autobuild can handle 
tarballs on any platform, but if you are making a package for windows and not 
installing with autobuild, it is better to use zip which is natively supported. 
 Changes here do the following:

1. enable the --archive-format option for autobuild package to choose the 
format of the package.
2. add support for reading an 'archive' entry per platform with the new 
'format' element to select the archive format with the configuration file.
3. add new edit command 'autobuild edit archive' to add archive configurations.
4. add support for installing zip formatted archives.


Diffs (updated)
-

  autobuild/autobuild_tool_edit.py ac90b03614ea 
  autobuild/autobuild_tool_package.py ac90b03614ea 
  autobuild/common.py ac90b03614ea 
  autobuild/configfile.py ac90b03614ea 
  autobuild/tests/test_common.py ac90b03614ea 
  autobuild/tests/test_package.py ac90b03614ea 

Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/diff


Testing
---


Thanks,

Alain

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Adds support for packaging and extracting zip formatted archives

2011-10-14 Thread Nat Goodspeed

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/#review1054
---

Ship it!


Looks good -- and thank you!

- Nat


On Oct. 14, 2011, 9:32 a.m., Alain Linden wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2011, 9:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Viewer, Oz Linden, Jenn, and Nat Goodspeed.
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
> These changes are to support packaging archives as zip files.  This is useful 
> when you are using autobuild to construct an archive that isn't really 
> intended to be used as an autobuild installable.  Internally autobuild can 
> handle tarballs on any platform, but if you are making a package for windows 
> and not installing with autobuild, it is better to use zip which is natively 
> supported.  Changes here do the following:
> 
> 1. enable the --archive-format option for autobuild package to choose the 
> format of the package.
> 2. add support for reading an 'archive' entry per platform with the new 
> 'format' element to select the archive format with the configuration file.
> 3. add new edit command 'autobuild edit archive' to add archive 
> configurations.
> 4. add support for installing zip formatted archives.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   autobuild/autobuild_tool_edit.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/autobuild_tool_package.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/common.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/configfile.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/tests/test_common.py ac90b03614ea 
>   autobuild/tests/test_package.py ac90b03614ea 
> 
> Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/494/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alain
> 
>

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] linux32 build startup failures.

2011-10-14 Thread Nicky Perian
2011-10-14T23:42:09Z llrender/llgl.cpp(1799) : error
2011-10-14T23:42:09Z ERROR: LLGLState: ASSERT (mWasEnabled == 
glIsEnabled(state))
A good build but, errors at start-up on both viewer development and kokua 
builds. SL downloaded binary runs w/o error.
The build system is Debian Squeeze i686 inside a Virtual Box VM with 3 cores 
and 3GB dedicated to the VM.___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges