[opensource-dev] just a test
the list still alive? I am not getting anything. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] just a test
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 16:21, Ponzu wrote: > the list still alive? I am not getting anything. Pong. Previous message I got from this list was by Trilo, 9 hours ago. Check https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/2011-April/date.html I note that you wrote from Yahoo. Now that I'm replying to you, Gmail puts a gmail.com address of yours in To:, and the yahoo.com address in Cc: o.O -- Opensource Obscure http://twitter.com/oobscure - http://opensourceobscure.com/lol ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Change to description for ShowNetStatus in debbug settings.
I agree with Boroondas. "Viewer and Network Usage" is wrong. Either "Packet Loss and Bandwidth" or simply "Network Performance". On 2011-04-05, at 16:55, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/251/ > > indra/newview/app_settings/settings.xml (Diff revision 1) > 9560 > Show the Search Bar in the Status Overlay > 9560 > Show the Status Indicators for the Viewer and Network Usage in > the Status Overlay > "Viewer Usage"? > > I think the indicators show packet loss and used network bandwidth. > > > - Boroondas > > > On April 5th, 2011, 9:31 a.m., Wolfpup Lowenhar wrote: > > Review request for Viewer. > By Wolfpup Lowenhar. > Updated April 5, 2011, 9:31 a.m. > > Description > > This is a change in the description for the ShowNetStatus debug setting. > Testing > > None needed as this is only a textual change. > Bugs: STORM-1098 > Diffs > > • indra/newview/app_settings/settings.xml (3fc9a496265c) > View Diff > > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges "Welcome back, Anonymous, we're glad to see you again!" ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] s3-proxy.lindenlab.com points to a private IP address?
On 2011-04-09 0:19, Celierra Darling wrote: I'm still seeing both of these, for FMOD and for KDU, in viewer-development rev 15768 (8b6c61efed4c), the latest revision at the moment. I can get past the FMOD step by explicitly specifying -- -DFMOD:BOOL=FALSE on the configure command line (suggested by Ima on #opensl), but KDU doesn't seem to have an option that's so simple. (I'd rather not edit the URL to download gray-area files if I can help it.) if you pass -DINSTALL_PROPRIETARY:BOOL=FALSE then the build will not use the KDU. Those files were uploaded to the wrong place in error, and should not have been referenced using the publicly available URL. They've been deleted. If you have copies of them, please delete them. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Intra-sim teleports and Local Chat History
On 2011-03-27 12:46, Opensource Obscure wrote: > Which is the expected behaviour for intra-sim teleports > and Local Chat History? should these teleports show up, > like when you teleport to a different region? > > They currently don't, but they're correctly recorded in the > Teleport History in Sidebar. > > This is why I waited before closing > https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-15259 as Released. Does anyone think that there's some important reason to change the current behavior? Is the notice in chat any more useful? Indeed, given that we have the teleport history, is the notice in chat really needed? I realize that it's not perfectly consistent, but I don't see that as a reason to change it. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Intra-sim teleports and Local Chat History
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 21:29, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > Does anyone think that there's some important reason to change the > current behavior? Is the notice in chat any more useful? Indeed, given > that we have the teleport history, is the notice in chat really needed? I'm used to the notice in chat and I find it useful. But I think it was created as a workaround looking for a better implementation, which the current teleport history in sidebar is supposed to be. >From a design/usability point of view, I'd say that removing the notice in chat would be the correct solution. That would move this functionality from a non-related place in the interface (the chat history) where it's only partially implemented, to its dedicated place where it works completely. Opensource Obscure -- http://twitter.com/oobscure - http://opensourceobscure.com/lol ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (STORM-1147) Other avatar's loose clothing\ flared cuffs look like they are tight\got no flare in v.2.4.0 and higher
(Please forgive the abject resolution in the following message. I am sure it will spoil somebody's day, but I am sorry. It is necessary to make this description unambiguous.) Oz, The fun thing about having this bug in my avatar's viewer is that it never affected the appearance of my avatar on my avatar's own camera. What this bug did affect was the appearance of other avatars on my avatar's camera. To reproduce the erroneous rendering on your own would require you to know positively what some other avatar's appearance should be. The most positive way to do this is to run two separate instances of the Second Life viewer in a manner preventing them from having any interaction save from that provided by the Second Life Grid's network. Running each on it's own host computer is the easiest configuration. Each would, of course, need to have it's own Second Life account and ideally they would be visually side by side both in Second Life and on your desk. Running two sessions of the Second Life viewer on a single host does not positively isolate them from each other at this time unless you take great care to ensure they SHARE NO DATA FILES. Shared cache and/or user setting files can corrupt efforts to reproduce this issue. That said, once the bug is gone, you can look around and see that other avatars do wear clothing that has looseness, flared pant legs and is affected by simulation wind. When it's there, it's obvious. When it's missing, you might not notice as many avatars do wear all clothing except skirts and coats tightly. Not knowing what their intended appearance is can make this defect unobtrusive in casual use or systematic testing that does not have a specific item in a test plan to look for properly rendered clothing including all of the above requirements. Time for an amended test plan. Ardy Lay ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
[opensource-dev] GPL'd files in viewer-dev repository
Greetings, Just a heads up to anybody building any kind of official TPVs: Do not use the llPhysicsMotion.cpp and .h that are currently in the repository, nor derivate code off them. They come with GPL headers and would taint any relased builds into being GPL licensed, certainly an oversight on the Lab's part. See http://hg.secondlife.com/viewer-development/src/1d91cf66ee6e/indra/newview/llphysicsmotion.cpp and http://hg.secondlife.com/viewer-development/src/1d91cf66ee6e/indra/newview/llphysicsmotion.h --Chalice Yao ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Intra-sim teleports and Local Chat History
I think it does serve as a good deliminator between distinct sections of the chat record, and as a nice bit of context in chat logs. And logging only with inter-sim teleports happens to be a good rough indicator for what sort of context shift could be 'big enough' to log. For those uses, one might consider changing it to list both the origin and destination of the teleport (or perhaps revamp it entirely for that usage specifically). Celi On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Opensource Obscure < opensourceobsc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 21:29, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) > wrote: > > > Does anyone think that there's some important reason to change the > > current behavior? Is the notice in chat any more useful? Indeed, given > > that we have the teleport history, is the notice in chat really needed? > > I'm used to the notice in chat and I find it useful. But I think > it was created as a workaround looking for a better implementation, > which the current teleport history in sidebar is supposed to be. > > From a design/usability point of view, I'd say that removing the > notice in chat would be the correct solution. That would move > this functionality from a non-related place in the interface > (the chat history) where it's only partially implemented, > to its dedicated place where it works completely. > > Opensource Obscure > -- > http://twitter.com/oobscure - http://opensourceobscure.com/lol > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: OPEN-61 Adding locations that VC redistributable package installs files.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/259/ --- (Updated April 9, 2011, 6:27 p.m.) Review request for Viewer. Changes --- Changed the search to use a registry lookup for the %SystemRoot% instead of the environment variable WINDIR. Also added warning messages if the files are not located. Summary --- The VC redistributable package installs its files (msvcr100.dll, msvcp100.dll, msvcr100d.dll, msvcp100d.dll, etc.) to the WINDOWS\System32 directory (and WINDOWS\SysWOW64, if it is a 64-bit version). Adding these locations to the list of places to look when attempting to copy the files to build-vc100\sharedlibs. On 64 bit windows the 32-bit file versions go to SySWOW64, so this is listed first to prevent the 64-bit versions being used. If any one knows how it could use %systemroot% instead of the environment variable WINDIR I'd appreciate the info ;-) This addresses bug OPEN-61. http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/OPEN-61 Diffs (updated) - indra/cmake/Copy3rdPartyLibs.cmake 33ca961b0870 Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/259/diff Testing --- Ran 'autobuild build' without manually copying the redistributable files or adding the configure switch to point at their location. Thanks, Ima ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (STORM-1147) Other avatar's loose clothing\ flared cuffs look like they are tight\got no flare in v.2.4.0 and higher
> Time for an amended test plan. Based on my personal experience and inaccurate memory, I remember three times in the history of SL that this bug in some form has cropped up. I agree. This should definitely be watched for. Sporting accidental skin-tight slacks, Stickman ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] GPL'd files in viewer-dev repository
On 2011-04-09 20:28, Ambrosia wrote: > Greetings, > > Just a heads up to anybody building any kind of official TPVs: > > Do not use the llPhysicsMotion.cpp and .h that are currently in the > repository, nor derivate code off them. > They come with GPL headers and would taint any relased builds into > being GPL licensed, certainly an oversight on the Lab's part. > > See > http://hg.secondlife.com/viewer-development/src/1d91cf66ee6e/indra/newview/llphysicsmotion.cpp > and > http://hg.secondlife.com/viewer-development/src/1d91cf66ee6e/indra/newview/llphysicsmotion.h > > --Chalice Yao Thanks for pointing those out I fixed them in changeset d818c6ffc72e. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
