Re: [opensource-dev] User story

2010-09-06 Thread Opensource Obscure

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:06:25 -0700, Whatcha Eaton 
wrote:
> As a user [...] I'd like the search box to take focus when I press
ctrl-i
> for the inventory side-bar.

http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-18496
has been reopened after it was closed/resolved by Dessie Linden 
as Expected Behavior

also http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-19700 
has been created as a new feature request

please vote & comment both of them since I can't really say
what's the correct one. This sounds like a regression to me 
and other users, but since Dessie had closed VWR-18496,
I also created the feature request.

Opensource Obscure
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Request for review/testing Socks 5 support for viewer-development (VWR-20801)

2010-09-06 Thread Tofu Linden
Hi Robin,
Is there a clear blocker for this?  My loose grasp of the situation
is that it's waiting for some Socks users to verify that this
works for them out in the wild.  Is this correct?
Cheers.

Robin Cornelius wrote:
> As mentioned at Oz's OH yesterday, I would like to try to finish off
> the Socks 5 proxy work in the sprint about to start, my repository can
> be found at
> 
> https://bitbucket.org/robincornelius/viewer-development-vwr-20801
> 
> It is a few days out of date, and I will address that ASAP, but I am
> more concerned with the functionality of the core feature at this
> immediate stage to make sure it does what it says on the tin for
> everyone else. I've compiled on all 3 platforms ok but I've only
> tested currently on windows as my other boxes are having issues
> running the viewer (for various off topic reasons that i'm fixing when
> i get time)
> 
> I started a test plan (also incomplete/outof date currently)
> https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1LM1EjS_RFzgR_3nkDkrpM8NMBuQaeJo7CDbp21fCE_Q&hl=en&authkey=CIjDl9sB
> 
> The proxy supports the same feature set as the original implementation
> in Snowglobe 1.X, that is http traffic can be sent to a http proxy
> (web proxy setting) independent of the UDP trafic being sent to a
> socks 5 proxy. This provides combinations that allow
> http-texture/asset to be sent via squids (with appropriate store
> rewrite rule) to cache textures/assets. Access to these extra modes
> can be achieved by clicking the tool icon to the side of the socks
> proxy address/port field on preferences/network
> 
> I believe this feature is a partial answer to the story  "As a
> Business User, I am sometimes unable to access SL at all from behind
> my company firewall. How do I work around this?" on the back log,
> clearly this only provides one method to work from behind a firewall
> and currently it does not address Voice at all. It is possible to
> proxy voice via socks 5 as well, but this requires other modifications
> that are outside the scope of this jira/feature, but is something I
> have done a functional proof of concept test on, i just need to find a
> clean solution that is acceptable and easy to use.
> 
> Robin
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


[opensource-dev] How to get your changes merged pretty quickly!

2010-09-06 Thread Tofu Linden
A quick note for people since there's still some confusion (and will
probably be more, as we migrate to the new Jira workflow, sory):

If you have some changes that you think are:
+ Working properly
+ Adequately reviewed
+ Ready for day-to-day public consumption

... then please assign the issue to 'snowglobe team' and set QA status
to 'ready to integrate'.  Then they'll pop up in our filter magically
and someone will likely merge them.

This is not meant to be a complete articulation of the submission
process, just the final bit. :)

Cheers.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] How to get your changes merged pretty quickly!

2010-09-06 Thread Boroondas Gupte
 Hi Tofu

Thanks for clearing this up!

On 09/06/2010 02:58 PM, Tofu Linden wrote:
> If you have some changes that you think are:
> + Working properly
> + Adequately reviewed
> + Ready for day-to-day public consumption
>
> ... then please assign the issue to 'snowglobe team' and set QA status
> to 'ready to integrate'.  Then they'll pop up in our filter magically
> and someone will likely merge them.
What if the second point (Adequately reviewed) is still missing?

What's the difference between "Fixed - On Review" and "Fixed - Ready for
QA"?

Cheers,
Boroondas


___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] How to get your changes merged pretty quickly!

2010-09-06 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
  On 2010-09-06 9:12, Boroondas Gupte wrote:
>   Hi Tofu
>
> Thanks for clearing this up!
>
> On 09/06/2010 02:58 PM, Tofu Linden wrote:
>> If you have some changes that you think are:
>> + Working properly
>> + Adequately reviewed
>> + Ready for day-to-day public consumption
>>
>> ... then please assign the issue to 'snowglobe team' and set QA status
>> to 'ready to integrate'.  Then they'll pop up in our filter magically
>> and someone will likely merge them.
> What if the second point (Adequately reviewed) is still missing?
>
> What's the difference between "Fixed - On Review" and "Fixed - Ready for
> QA"?
The former is "developer done - please review code & functionality"; the 
later is "code has been integrated - QA should verify".   Those are 
separate states in the new workflow that should be live tomorrow.

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Which build should I try?

2010-09-06 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
  On 2010-09-05 12:33, Ponzu wrote:
> So, new question...
>
> What is the last build known to allow logging in from a Mac?  (I have 
> iMac and mbp, and both freeze at login.)
>
208707 is working for me.

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Request for review/testing Socks 5 support for viewer-development (VWR-20801)

2010-09-06 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
  On 2010-09-06 8:01, Tofu Linden wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> Is there a clear blocker for this?  My loose grasp of the situation
> is that it's waiting for some Socks users to verify that this
> works for them out in the wild.  Is this correct?
It also needs an upgrade of the curl library.

I've built the one that has a fix, but not tested it in a viewer build - 
perhaps you can help with that part, Tofu.  The repo that builds the new 
curl is at http://hg.lindenlab.com/oz/curl-autobuild

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Which build should I try?

2010-09-06 Thread Ponzu
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <
o...@lindenlab.com> wrote:

>  On 2010-09-05 12:33, Ponzu wrote:
> > So, new question...
> >
> > What is the last build known to allow logging in from a Mac?  (I have
> > iMac and mbp, and both freeze at login.)
> >
> 208707 is working for me.
>
>
OK, thanks.  I am still curious, though.  Is it somehow normal that the
"latest" build fails to even completely launch?  Is it my hardware or
something?  My settings?
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for review/testing Socks 5 support for viewer-development (VWR-20801)

2010-09-06 Thread Ponzu
Are there users to test this?  I don't mean to be catty, but if there aren't
people clamoring for this, maybe it can go lower on the priority list.  Just
saying...

Faster, Easier, Funner...yeah, that's the ticket.

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <
o...@lindenlab.com> wrote:

>  On 2010-09-06 8:01, Tofu Linden wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> > Is there a clear blocker for this?  My loose grasp of the situation
> > is that it's waiting for some Socks users to verify that this
> > works for them out in the wild.  Is this correct?
> It also needs an upgrade of the curl library.
>
> I've built the one that has a fix, but not tested it in a viewer build -
> perhaps you can help with that part, Tofu.  The repo that builds the new
> curl is at http://hg.lindenlab.com/oz/curl-autobuild
>
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] Somewhat stable developer viewer

2010-09-06 Thread Ponzu
The snow storm wiki seems to say that users should try

- Viewer 2 (stable)
- Development Viewer snap shot (somewhat stable)
- Latest Build (look out!)

The problem is there is no hint about the Snap Shot?  Even just a
build number would be OK.  Oz has suggested 208707 works for him, but
it is not on the page with all the latest builds.  209029 and 209046
*don't* work for me.  They partially start, and then freeze.  (Do
those reports *really* go to Apple?  Do they forward them to you guys?
 Do you need some scripts that process them and categorize them?  That
I could probably do.)

Until I can get my head wrapped around the whole development cycle, I
see myself making minor contributions to the Wiki and to testing.

lee
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Somewhat stable developer viewer

2010-09-06 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)

 On 2010-09-06 11:16, Ponzu wrote:

The snow storm wiki seems to say that users should try

- Viewer 2 (stable)
- Development Viewer snap shot (somewhat stable)
- Latest Build (look out!)

The problem is there is no hint about the Snap Shot?  Even just a
build number would be OK.  Oz has suggested 208707 works for him, but
it is not on the page with all the latest builds.  209029 and 209046
*don't*  work for me.  They partially start, and then freeze.  (Do
those reports*really*  go to Apple?  Do they forward them to you guys?
  Do you need some scripts that process them and categorize them?  That
I could probably do.


We've had a little trouble with getting the bi-weekly build added to the 
downloads page, but it should be there on Tuesday, and we'll add a 
pointer to the wiki then.


In the mean time, this is the latest Development build I've tested on my 
Mac:


http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/snowstorm_viewer-development/rev/208921/index.html

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Which build should I try?

2010-09-06 Thread Tillie Ariantho
On 06.09.2010 16:46, Ponzu wrote:

> OK, thanks.  I am still curious, though.  Is it somehow normal that the
> "latest" build fails to even completely launch?  Is it my hardware or
> something?  My settings?

Ponzu, it's DEV builds, they can do ANYTHING besides running. ^^

Tillie
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


[opensource-dev] Code Review Request: VWR-21253 (Permissions icons in the friends list)

2010-09-06 Thread Aimee Linden
Hi,

Could I get some eyes on a fix for http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-21253 
...

http://bitbucket.org/aimee_linden/viewer-development-tweaks/changeset/fb38222f1b08

A test build containing this is available here ...

http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/aimee_viewer-development-tweaks/rev/208486/index.html

Thanks,

Aimee.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Somewhat stable developer viewer

2010-09-06 Thread Sythos
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:16:18 -0400
Ponzu  wrote:

> The problem is there is no hint about the Snap Shot?  Even just a
> build number would be OK.  Oz has suggested 208707 works for him, but
> it is not on the page with all the latest builds.  209029 and 209046
> *don't* work for me.  They partially start, and then freeze.  (Do

i've a 6years old iMac 24", it work "fine" (12fps...), with snow
leopard (ATI video)
it work... but:

if
UseAppleMultiGL=TRUE ==> crash

or if
RenderTriangle (memory leak, maybe other name, is the debug options to
render using triangles)=TRUE ==> crash

try to delete it (so delete settings too) and reinstall again (and
don't touch 2 parameters above)
i'm using:
http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/snowstorm_viewer-development/rev/209046/arch/Darwin/installer/SecondLife_2_1_2_209046_DEVELOPMENT.dmg
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Code Review Request: VWR-21253 (Permissions icons in the friends list)

2010-09-06 Thread Marine Kelley
Err... color me stupid but... how does one show the friends list in this
style on viewer 2 ? I can detach tabs from the sidebar, but I cannot find a
way to show the permissions matrix. It would be so handy !

Thanks,
Marine


On 6 September 2010 18:53, Aimee Linden  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Could I get some eyes on a fix for
> http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-21253 ...
>
>
> http://bitbucket.org/aimee_linden/viewer-development-tweaks/changeset/fb38222f1b08
>
> A test build containing this is available here ...
>
>
> http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/aimee_viewer-development-tweaks/rev/208486/index.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aimee.
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Code Review Request: VWR-21253 (Permissions icons in the friends list)

2010-09-06 Thread leliel
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Marine Kelley  wrote:
> Err... color me stupid but... how does one show the friends list in this
> style on viewer 2 ? I can detach tabs from the sidebar, but I cannot find a
> way to show the permissions matrix. It would be so handy !

Hover the mouse over their name in the friends list and it will show
the permission icons.

Works fine for me on Linux. Looks like it uses the 1.23 icons which
don't fit in with the theme on 2.x tho.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Code Review Request: VWR-21253 (Permissions icons in the friends list)

2010-09-06 Thread Alexandrea Fride
Works fine on windows to
however icons dont fit with viewer 2 style :)
if not mistaken those are the icons from viewer 1

(and prefered if the icons where a bit smaller in weight & height and more 
easly to define what is what)

@Kelley that was probly a alpha viewer 2 release since if you look at 
chatbar etc style its completly different then we are used to

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:50 AM, leliel  wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Marine Kelley  
> wrote:
>> Err... color me stupid but... how does one show the friends list in this
>> style on viewer 2 ? I can detach tabs from the sidebar, but I cannot find 
>> a
>> way to show the permissions matrix. It would be so handy !
>
> Hover the mouse over their name in the friends list and it will show
> the permission icons.
>
> Works fine for me on Linux. Looks like it uses the 1.23 icons which
> don't fit in with the theme on 2.x tho. 

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


Re: [opensource-dev] Code Review Request: VWR-21253 (Permissions icons in the friends list)

2010-09-06 Thread Boroondas Gupte
 On 09/06/2010 07:37 PM, Marine Kelley wrote:
> Err... color me stupid but... how does one show the friends list in
> this style on viewer 2 ? I can detach tabs from the sidebar, but I
> cannot find a way to show the permissions matrix. It would be so handy !
> [...]
>
> On 6 September 2010 18:53, Aimee Linden  > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could I get some eyes on a fix for
> http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-21253 ...
> [...]
>
I guess you refer to the screenshot attached to the jira issue? Note the
date when that one was added, Oct. 15, 20*09*. Also note the artwork and
color scheme. I guess that was from an early development version of
Viewer 2 that already had the people sidebar tab but also still had the
old code of the contacts panel, so that both could be compared within a
single application. (That, or it's a mock-up.)

If you read the comments you'll note this isn't what Aimee has
implemented now: She shows permissions in the hover tips, it seems.

I'd still prefer to see all perms at one glance without hovering. Moon
Metty's suggestion to only display non-default values would indeed avoid
the cluttering and, more important, would also make these values stand
out. I think this could nicely be done with icons similar the maturity
rating and parcel permission ones in the navigation bar.

Cheers,
Boroondas

PS: why are you CCing to snowst...@lists.lindenlab.com? That list
doesn't seem to exist.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Code Review Request: VWR-21253 (Permissions icons in the friends list)

2010-09-06 Thread Marine Kelley
On 6 September 2010 22:23, Boroondas Gupte wrote:

> I guess you refer to the screenshot attached to the jira issue? Note the
> date when that one was added, Oct. 15, 20*09*. Also note the artwork and
> color scheme. I guess that was from an early development version of Viewer 2
> that already had the people sidebar tab but also still had the old code of
> the contacts panel, so that both could be compared within a single
> application. (That, or it's a mock-up.)
>

Yes that's what I suspected, but there was a chance that the old code would
still be there and activated with a secret voodoo gesture.



> PS: why are you CCing to snowst...@lists.lindenlab.com? That list doesn't
> seem to exist.
>

I replied to all as I always do, without bothering to what list I was
actually sending. lol
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] Snowglobe 1.5 + Phoenix Doxygen + full Graphs

2010-09-06 Thread Brandon Husbands
http://dimentox.com/phoenixdox/

Snowglobe 1.5 + Phoenix Doxygen + full Graphs

YAY!

-- 
---
This email is a private and confidential communication. Any use of email may
be subject to the laws and regulations of the United States. You may not
Repost, Distribute nor reproduce any content of this message.
---
---
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges