[opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine
I can't keep secrets, so I get blackboxed. It bugs me there are perfect, or almost perfect, programs that just need to be turned around in a way. Too many people are stuck in a paradigm that to even think about it would create a paradox to them. Is that the meaning of paradyme in motion? I think that means people are soon gonna realize that the spam has already started to be a problem where smarter filters don't work anymore. Just observing an email has already been a problem to spam others. They can't even tell the difference between a save button and a button that saves itself... adware. We don't need smart filters. We need a dumb filter... with love! On that note, I doubt support for MOAP as it exists now is going to last, yet there was an obvious other purpose if you read the source. I know various solutions to this, and they all have the answer, yet I know people will want to walk their own path. My question is, should we collect a few more solutions? As a kid, I loved playing go fish, and then gin, and then gin rummy, and rummy, and then rummykub. =) Poker probably fits right between gin and gin rummy. MOAP is like gin rummykub with a pun. There is an opportunity here with MOAP while it lasts, yet don't expect specific external protocol to last. I'm listening to many ideas everyone wants that it makes me feel not to change it at all, step on a few toes, and rip this from that, and put this big hated thing right there, and maybe sometime state there is only backword compatibility based on the libraries now compiled. What's the difference? How about: 1) Running both code bases on the same machine 2) Running precompiled linux binaries on windows machines "right there" 3) Apple? I only hear about iPhones from them and not... Do I really want to do the hard work by myself? Do I have to explain... How about... do you want it right there... or somewhere else? How about turning around without even turning around? My secret... -- --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol --- Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > As a kid, I loved playing go fish, and then gin, and then gin rummy, and > rummy, and then rummykub. =) Am I accidently filtering part of this list? This is not the first message I've gotten that seems completely out of context... - Bunny ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Bunny Halberd wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > >> As a kid, I loved playing go fish, and then gin, and then gin rummy, and >> rummy, and then rummykub. =) > > Am I accidently filtering part of this list? This is not the first > message I've gotten that seems completely out of context... > > - Bunny I'm with you Bunny the last few messages haven't made hardly any sense at all. I know it has something to do with some card games, MOAP and apple but what do they all have in common and is it relevant to opensource-dev? ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine
Marc Adored wrote: > I'm with you Bunny the last few messages haven't made hardly any sense > at all. I know it has something to do with some card games, MOAP and > apple but what do they all have in common and is it relevant to > opensource-dev? > > For accessibility needs. Actually, we did something the "server only" devs wanted. Imagine VX.X source uploaded a texture to opensim. Then imagine that being downloaded to Radegast. Then imagine it telling users the description of the texture. If there is any problems, I'll be sure to show the timeslice coLinux takes in between VX.X and webkit just to let them think thereafter what that meant. If that doesn't mean anything, then I've done what I have to do to protect your context. However, google might translate that texture to GPL code with image recognition. They are concerned this is viral. I think that got that backwards. BSD is for students only. -- --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol --- Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
