Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[Opensource Obscure]

Me too, I think it would be nice :) but I also think
nobody is going to do it right now - a new viewer 
is going to be released in the few next weeks.

While next viewer won't be different from the 
compilation and building point of view, I guess 
most people think it's pointless to write new
documentation for a viewer that won't be used 
anymore in a few months.

Also, this is not such a *huge* issue..well, 
it is..for you, me and a few other people. 
Most people who want to compile their builds 
know how to work around issues without step-to-step
instructions because they're programmers.

It seems you can't, and for sure I couldn't 
either, unfortunately. But I'm pretty sure we
will fix this, as there are many people here
waiting for Viewer 2 code release.

bye
opensource obscure
--
come to LOL, take my scripts, mock me:
http://bit.ly/dbObNk

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:47:17 -0600, james ross 
wrote:
> It doesn't work. This seems to be a huge issue. There are several
> tutorials out there but they all say I used piece of the tutorial from
here
> and a piece of the tutorial from there. I just think it would be nice if
> there were a step by step tutorial that actually had all the steps in
one
> location and when you made it to the end of the 5 hour install it would
> work.
> 
> If anyone knows of a fabled tutorial that actually functions, please
> please please let me know,
> James
> 
>> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:03:07 -0800
>> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
>> From: stick...@gmail.com
>> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
>> CC: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>> 
>> I haven't compiled the viewer myself, but most of what I've seen on
>> the list points to the wiki.
>> 
>>
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Compiling_and_Patching_Snowglobe_%28Linux%29
>> 
>> Some searching of the wiki of your own may turn up something more
>> relevant to your interests. And I'm sure any problems you may
>> encounter will happily be addressed by this list.
>> 
>> -Stickman
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, james ross 
>> wrote:
>> > Is there a step by step guide to compiling. I can use any windows OS
or
>> > version of .NET.
>> >
>> > Please help,
>> > James
>> >
>> > 
>> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
>> > ___
>> > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>> > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>> > privileges
>> >
> 
> _
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[james ross]

Well I am at least glad to see others have the same issue. A new viewer coming 
out isnt going to change the fact that there is not one step-by-step tutorial 
out there. Without the community here making it easier for people to get 
involved any viewer will be under utilized (if at all). Heh and also, I've 
never met a programmer that didnt look for an example before trying to code it 
themselves :-).

> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:40:51 +
> From: o...@autistici.org
> CC: stick...@gmail.com; opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> 
> 
> Me too, I think it would be nice :) but I also think
> 
> nobody is going to do it right now - a new viewer 
> 
> is going to be released in the few next weeks.
> 
> 
> 
> While next viewer won't be different from the 
> 
> compilation and building point of view, I guess 
> 
> most people think it's pointless to write new
> 
> documentation for a viewer that won't be used 
> 
> anymore in a few months.
> 
> 
> 
> Also, this is not such a *huge* issue..well, 
> 
> it is..for you, me and a few other people. 
> 
> Most people who want to compile their builds 
> 
> know how to work around issues without step-to-step
> 
> instructions because they're programmers.
> 
> 
> 
> It seems you can't, and for sure I couldn't 
> 
> either, unfortunately. But I'm pretty sure we
> 
> will fix this, as there are many people here
> 
> waiting for Viewer 2 code release.
> 
> 
> 
> bye
> 
> opensource obscure
> 
> --
> 
> come to LOL, take my scripts, mock me:
> 
> http://bit.ly/dbObNk
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:47:17 -0600, james ross 
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > It doesn't work. This seems to be a huge issue. There are several
> 
> > tutorials out there but they all say I used piece of the tutorial from
> 
> here
> 
> > and a piece of the tutorial from there. I just think it would be nice if
> 
> > there were a step by step tutorial that actually had all the steps in
> 
> one
> 
> > location and when you made it to the end of the 5 hour install it would
> 
> > work.
> 
> > 
> 
> > If anyone knows of a fabled tutorial that actually functions, please
> 
> > please please let me know,
> 
> > James
> 
> > 
> 
> >> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:03:07 -0800
> 
> >> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
> 
> >> From: stick...@gmail.com
> 
> >> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> 
> >> CC: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> I haven't compiled the viewer myself, but most of what I've seen on
> 
> >> the list points to the wiki.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >>
> 
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Compiling_and_Patching_Snowglobe_%28Linux%29
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> Some searching of the wiki of your own may turn up something more
> 
> >> relevant to your interests. And I'm sure any problems you may
> 
> >> encounter will happily be addressed by this list.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> -Stickman
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, james ross 
> 
> >> wrote:
> 
> >> > Is there a step by step guide to compiling. I can use any windows OS
> 
> or
> 
> >> > version of .NET.
> 
> >> >
> 
> >> > Please help,
> 
> >> > James
> 
> >> >
> 
> >> > 
> 
> >> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
> 
> >> > ___
> 
> >> > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> 
> >> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> 
> >> > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> 
> >> > privileges
> 
> >> >
> 
> >   
> 
> > _
> 
> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> 
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] Unsubscribe

[Russ, Howell]

Pls unsubscribe me




From: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com 
 
To: o...@autistici.org  
Cc: snowglobeMailingList  
Sent: Wed Feb 17 03:52:21 2010
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe 


Well I am at least glad to see others have the same issue. A new viewer coming 
out isnt going to change the fact that there is not one step-by-step tutorial 
out there. Without the community here making it easier for people to get 
involved any viewer will be under utilized (if at all). Heh and also, I've 
never met a programmer that didnt look for an example before trying to code it 
themselves :-).

> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:40:51 +
> From: o...@autistici.org
> CC: stick...@gmail.com; opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> 
> 
> Me too, I think it would be nice :) but I also think
> 
> nobody is going to do it right now - a new viewer 
> 
> is going to be released in the few next weeks.
> 
> 
> 
> While next viewer won't be different from the 
> 
> compilation and building point of view, I guess 
> 
> most people think it's pointless to write new
> 
> documentation for a viewer that won't be used 
> 
> anymore in a few months.
> 
> 
> 
> Also, this is not such a *huge* issue..well, 
> 
> it is..for you, me and a few other people. 
> 
> Most people who want to compile their builds 
> 
> know how to work around issues without step-to-step
> 
> instructions because they're programmers.
> 
> 
> 
> It seems you can't, and for sure I couldn't 
> 
> either, unfortunately. But I'm pretty sure we
> 
> will fix this, as there are many people here
> 
> waiting for Viewer 2 code release.
> 
> 
> 
> bye
> 
> opensource obscure
> 
> --
> 
> come to LOL, take my scripts, mock me:
> 
> http://bit.ly/dbObNk
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:47:17 -0600, james ross 
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > It doesn't work. This seems to be a huge issue. There are several
> 
> > tutorials out there but they all say I used piece of the tutorial from
> 
> here
> 
> > and a piece of the tutorial from there. I just think it would be nice if
> 
> > there were a step by step tutorial that actually had all the steps in
> 
> one
> 
> > location and when you made it to the end of the 5 hour install it would
> 
> > work.
> 
> > 
> 
> > If anyone knows of a fabled tutorial that actually functions, please
> 
> > please please let me know,
> 
> > James
> 
> > 
> 
> >> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:03:07 -0800
> 
> >> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
> 
> >> From: stick...@gmail.com
> 
> >> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> 
> >> CC: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> I haven't compiled the viewer myself, but most of what I've seen on
> 
> >> the list points to the wiki.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >>
> 
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Compiling_and_Patching_Snowglobe_%28Linux%29
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> Some searching of the wiki of your own may turn up something more
> 
> >> relevant to your interests. And I'm sure any problems you may
> 
> >> encounter will happily be addressed by this list.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> -Stickman
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, james ross 
> 
> >> wrote:
> 
> >> > Is there a step by step guide to compiling. I can use any windows OS
> 
> or
> 
> >> > version of .NET.
> 
> >> >
> 
> >> > Please help,
> 
> >> > James
> 
> >> >
> 
> >> > 
> 
> >> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
> 
> >> > ___
> 
> >> > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> 
> >> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> 
> >> > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> 
> >> > privileges
> 
> >> >
> 
> > 
> 
> > _
> 
> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> 
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/




Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. 
 
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Unsubscribe

[C.J. Adams-Collier]

Pls unsubscribe yourself:

X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Open source development issues relating to Second Life
 
List-Unsubscribe:
 ,
 
List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help:

List-Subscribe:
 ,
 

On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 07:53 -0500, Russ, Howell wrote:
> Pls unsubscribe me
> 
> 
> 
> __
> 
> From: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com
>  
> To: o...@autistici.org  
> Cc: snowglobeMailingList  
> Sent: Wed Feb 17 03:52:21 2010
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling
> snowglobe 
> 
> 
> Well I am at least glad to see others have the same issue. A new
> viewer coming out isnt going to change the fact that there is not one
> step-by-step tutorial out there. Without the community here making it
> easier for people to get involved any viewer will be under utilized
> (if at all). Heh and also, I've never met a programmer that didnt look
> for an example before trying to code it themselves :-).
> 
> > To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling
> snowglobe
> > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:40:51 +
> > From: o...@autistici.org
> > CC: stick...@gmail.com; opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> > 
> > 
> > Me too, I think it would be nice :) but I also think
> > 
> > nobody is going to do it right now - a new viewer 
> > 
> > is going to be released in the few next weeks.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > While next viewer won't be different from the 
> > 
> > compilation and building point of view, I guess 
> > 
> > most people think it's pointless to write new
> > 
> > documentation for a viewer that won't be used 
> > 
> > anymore in a few months.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Also, this is not such a *huge* issue..well, 
> > 
> > it is..for you, me and a few other people. 
> > 
> > Most people who want to compile their builds 
> > 
> > know how to work around issues without step-to-step
> > 
> > instructions because they're programmers.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > It seems you can't, and for sure I couldn't 
> > 
> > either, unfortunately. But I'm pretty sure we
> > 
> > will fix this, as there are many people here
> > 
> > waiting for Viewer 2 code release.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > bye
> > 
> > opensource obscure
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > come to LOL, take my scripts, mock me:
> > 
> > http://bit.ly/dbObNk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:47:17 -0600, james ross
> 
> > 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > It doesn't work. This seems to be a huge issue. There are several
> > 
> > > tutorials out there but they all say I used piece of the tutorial
> from
> > 
> > here
> > 
> > > and a piece of the tutorial from there. I just think it would be
> nice if
> > 
> > > there were a step by step tutorial that actually had all the steps
> in
> > 
> > one
> > 
> > > location and when you made it to the end of the 5 hour install it
> would
> > 
> > > work.
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > If anyone knows of a fabled tutorial that actually functions,
> please
> > 
> > > please please let me know,
> > 
> > > James
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> > >> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:03:07 -0800
> > 
> > >> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling
> snowglobe
> > 
> > >> From: stick...@gmail.com
> > 
> > >> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> > 
> > >> CC: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> > 
> > >> 
> > 
> > >> I haven't compiled the viewer myself, but most of what I've seen
> on
> > 
> > >> the list points to the wiki.
> > 
> > >> 
> > 
> > >>
> > 
> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Compiling_and_Patching_Snowglobe_%
> 28Linux%29
> > 
> > >> 
> > 
> > >> Some searching of the wiki of your own may turn up something more
> > 
> > >> relevant to your interests. And I'm sure any problems you may
> > 
> > >> encounter will happily be addressed by this list.
> > 
> > >> 
> > 
> > >> -Stickman
> > 
> > >> 
> > 
> > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, james ross
> 
> > 
> > >> wrote:
> > 
> > >> > Is there a step by step guide to compiling. I can use any
> windows OS
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > >> > version of .NET.
> > 
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> > Please help,
> > 
> > >> > James
> > 
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> > 
> > 
> > >> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it
> now.
> > 
> > >> > ___
> > 
> > >> > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> > 
> > >> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> > 
> > >> > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated
> posting

Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[Mike Monkowski]

Seems like you're looking for a shortcut.  The main Snowglobe page says
> The Get source and compile page gives general information about how to 
> compile the source. For a quick step-by-step instruction for building on 
> Linux, see Compiling and Patching Snowglobe (Linux). 

Did you look at http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Get_source_and_compile


james ross wrote:
> Well I am at least glad to see others have the same issue. A new viewer 
> coming out isnt going to change the fact that there is not one 
> step-by-step tutorial out there. Without the community here making it 
> easier for people to get involved any viewer will be under utilized (if 
> at all). Heh and also, I've never met a programmer that didnt look for 
> an example before trying to code it themselves :-).

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[Robert Martin]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Mike Monkowski
 wrote:
> Seems like you're looking for a shortcut.  The main Snowglobe page says
>> The Get source and compile page gives general information about how to 
>> compile the source. For a quick step-by-step instruction for building on 
>> Linux, see Compiling and Patching Snowglobe (Linux).
>
> Did you look at http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Get_source_and_compile
>
the biggest problem as such is some parts of the compile run seem to require
chicken blood and sheep entrails.

until somebody fixes the Boost Hell problem and other But we haven't
updated our compile farm in the last 3 years so you have to use an old
version type deals a simple this will work
listing can not happen.

I would be shocked and seriously doubt the skills of the LL paid
programmers if SL 2.0 did not get used as an excuse to fix these
problems. There should come a day when you can build a tree with all
of the libs and assets invoke a "All targets -- static" command and
have all the platforms done in one single (but massive) run.

-- 
Robert L Martin
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[Armin Weatherwax]

Robert Martin schrieb:
> the biggest problem as such is some parts of the compile run seem to
> require chicken blood and sheep entrails.
I personally have a 3-legged black cat, but that might be a Linux 
specific helper and explain little differences in mouse handling. 
(scnr)
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[james ross]

I am not sure if i tried the path listed there specifically. I have tried many 
different paths. I hope this one works. A shortcut or something that is easy is 
not really required but would definately be nice. I would be extremely thrilled 
if anything would work :-).

 

Thanks,

James


 
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:30:41 -0500
> From: monko...@fishkill.ibm.com
> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> CC: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
> 
> Seems like you're looking for a shortcut. The main Snowglobe page says
> > The Get source and compile page gives general information about how to 
> > compile the source. For a quick step-by-step instruction for building on 
> > Linux, see Compiling and Patching Snowglobe (Linux). 
> 
> Did you look at http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Get_source_and_compile
> 
> 
> james ross wrote:
> > Well I am at least glad to see others have the same issue. A new viewer 
> > coming out isnt going to change the fact that there is not one 
> > step-by-step tutorial out there. Without the community here making it 
> > easier for people to get involved any viewer will be under utilized (if 
> > at all). Heh and also, I've never met a programmer that didnt look for 
> > an example before trying to code it themselves :-).
> 
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe

[k\o\w]

On Windows it's as easy as double clicking develop.py. Sounds like maybe 
you're not ready for Linux, and should try to a more user friendly OS/IDE.


Snowglobe should work out of the box with VS2005. Emerald and Imprudence 
are easier options if you're using VS2008. I believe the only issue with 
VS2008 + snowglobe is boost, and the libs from Emerald or Imprudence can 
be dropped in to fix that.



On 2/17/2010 2:08 PM, james ross wrote:
I am not sure if i tried the path listed there specifically. I have 
tried many different paths. I hope this one works. A shortcut or 
something that is easy is not really required but would definately be 
nice. I would be extremely thrilled if anything would work :-).


Thanks,
James


> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:30:41 -0500
> From: monko...@fishkill.ibm.com
> To: dragnier1...@hotmail.com
> CC: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] step by step guide to compiling snowglobe
>
> Seems like you're looking for a shortcut. The main Snowglobe page says
> > The Get source and compile page gives general information about 
how to compile the source. For a quick step-by-step instruction for 
building on Linux, see Compiling and Patching Snowglobe (Linux).

>
> Did you look at http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Get_source_and_compile
>
>
> james ross wrote:
> > Well I am at least glad to see others have the same issue. A new 
viewer

> > coming out isnt going to change the fact that there is not one
> > step-by-step tutorial out there. Without the community here making it
> > easier for people to get involved any viewer will be under 
utilized (if
> > at all). Heh and also, I've never met a programmer that didnt look 
for

> > an example before trying to code it themselves :-).
>


Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up 
now. 



___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] SecondLife 2.0 beta download????

[Robert Martin]

 ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to
 download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/)
 is this a case of released to soon or what??




-- 
Robert L Martin
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] SecondLife 2.0 beta download????

[Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin)]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Martin  wrote:
>  ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to
>  download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/)
>  is this a case of released to soon or what??

Your question cannot be answered unless you sign an NDA. :-)
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] SecondLife 2.0 beta download????

[Tillie Ariantho]

On 17.02.2010 21:25, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Martin  wrote:
>>  ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to
>>  download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/)
>>  is this a case of released to soon or what??
> 
> Your question cannot be answered unless you sign an NDA. :-)

I'll sign an NDA happily if I get an answer for that and get a working download 
link for the 2.0 beta. ;-D

Tillie
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] SecondLife 2.0 beta download????

[Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin)]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Tillie Ariantho  wrote:
> On 17.02.2010 21:25, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Martin  wrote:
>>>  ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to
>>>  download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/)
>>>  is this a case of released to soon or what??
>> Your question cannot be answered unless you sign an NDA. :-)
> I'll sign an NDA happily if I get an answer for that and get a working 
> download link for the 2.0 beta. ;-D

That's a different NDA.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] SecondLife 2.0 beta download????

[Maya Remblai]

Tillie Ariantho wrote:
> On 17.02.2010 21:25, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote:
>
>   
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Martin  wrote:
>> 
>>>  ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to
>>>  download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/)
>>>  is this a case of released to soon or what??
>>>   
>> Your question cannot be answered unless you sign an NDA. :-)
>> 
>
> I'll sign an NDA happily if I get an answer for that and get a working 
> download link for the 2.0 beta. ;-D
>
> Tillie
>   
I think pretty much everybody on this group would. At any rate, if they 
released 2.0 today it wouldn't be "early," it would be "on time." Blog 
posts pointed to a February release.

Also, technically it would be the BSI group that would be more likely to 
know this kind of thing, being the designated alpha testing group. (They 
weren't used for 2.0's alpha though, and the group has been silent for 
months, so I don't blame you. ;) )

~Maya Remblai, still a bit pessimistic.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] SecondLife 2.0 beta download????

[Tom Hale]

Hi folks:

Not ready yet!



On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Maya Remblai  wrote:

> Tillie Ariantho wrote:
>> On 17.02.2010 21:25, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Martin
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to
 download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/
 )
 is this a case of released to soon or what??

>>> Your question cannot be answered unless you sign an NDA. :-)
>>>
>>
>> I'll sign an NDA happily if I get an answer for that and get a
>> working download link for the 2.0 beta. ;-D
>>
>> Tillie
>>
> I think pretty much everybody on this group would. At any rate, if
> they
> released 2.0 today it wouldn't be "early," it would be "on time." Blog
> posts pointed to a February release.
>
> Also, technically it would be the BSI group that would be more
> likely to
> know this kind of thing, being the designated alpha testing group.
> (They
> weren't used for 2.0's alpha though, and the group has been silent for
> months, so I don't blame you. ;) )
>
> ~Maya Remblai, still a bit pessimistic.
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges