[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Jon Baron
Thanks to both. But I'm afraid that this advice does not help, and I
am giving up.

I suspect that what I am trying to do is impossible. And I also think
I was going about it wrong. I was trying to use /etc/aliases to get
the mail to go to procmail, with lines like this:

Method 1
jdm-society: "|/usr/bin/procmail -m /etc/procmailrc"

or

Method 2
jdm-society-owner: "|/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman owner jdm-society"

And then /etc/procmail had lines like this:

:0
* To:.*jdm-society-ow...@sjdm.org
| /etc/smrsh/mailman owner jdm-society

and /etc/smrsh has a soft links to /usr/bin/procmail and to
../../usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailm

(I don't know why the ../../ is there.)

Method 2 is what yielded the group mismatch.

Method 1 just said user not found.

I still have no idea where "baron" is coming from. I thought if I
could figure that out it would lead to a solution. procmail is not
"running". It is not listed in any version of "ps". It is evoked by
sendmail or by /etc/aliases.db. sendmail and aliases.db are both owned
by root and smmsp. I tried to change the owner of aliases.db to mail
rather than root, but it got changed back when I ran newaliases.

So I am giving up. We will just deal with the spam by hand. The list
is moderated, so none of it actually gets posted, and we discourage
some of it with a small captcha. (The really fancy ones are
impossible. I can't do them myself.)

I did read the link below, but I had not gotten up to trying to modify
the code. It seems to be written mainly for some other system than
what I have. (I'm using the last available Fedora RPM. I don't think
they are going to update Mailman 2, or fix the bug. I do not have time
to compile from source, since it is a major change - everything is in
a different place. And I won't change to Mailman 3 because, so far as
I can tell, we would not want any of its features and configuration
would also take a lot of time. I will leave all this to my
successor. Right now, everything works except the spam.)

https://wiki.list.org/DOC/4.23%20How%20do%20I%20use%20SpamAssassin%20with%20Mailman%3F

Thanks for trying.

Jon

On 05/16/22 00:45, Bruce  Johnson wrote:
> Are any of the processes being run by that user? like cron jobs?
> 
> Look throughthe mailman logs or other logs (it’s been a very long time; I 
> cannot remember if procmail and spamassasin have their own logs or they get 
> dumped into /var/log/messages (for RH-style systems; I forget what the 
> general syslog file is called in Debian style)


Answers: No. No. Nothing in the logs (several of them.)

>
> 
> > On May 15, 2022, at 4:35 PM, Jon Baron  wrote:
> > 
> > I'm sure this is a very dumb question, because I have seen several
> > posts about it, all of which imply that there is some simple solution.
> > 
> > I am trying to use spamassassin by running everything through
> > /etc/procmail, and I get the following in /var/log/procmail:
> > 
> > "Group mismatch error. Mailman expected the mail wrapper script to be
> > executed as one of the following groups:
> > [mail, postfix, mailman, nobody, daemon],
> > but the system's mail server executed the mail script as group: "baron".
> > Try tweaking the mail server to run the script as one of these groups:
> > [mail, postfix, mailman, nobody, daemon],"
> > 
> > The dumb question is: "What is the 'mail server'?" I thought it was
> > sendmail, but I have no idea where "baron" comes from. baron is just a
> > user on the system. The various IDs for mailman are set to sjdm.org in
> > the configuration file. I installed it as "root" from a Fedora RPM,
> > and the name "baron" had no part of that. So far as I can tell,
> > NOTHING in this system is owned by "baron" except my own account
> > (which is, however, included in several groups).
> > 
> > Jon
> > -- 
> > Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
> > Home page: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron
> > --
-- 
Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
Home page: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron
Founding Editor: Judgment and Decision Making (http://journal.sjdm.org)
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Carl Zwanzig

On 5/16/2022 3:42 AM, Jon Baron wrote:

  procmail is not
"running". It is not listed in any version of "ps". It is evoked by
sendmail or by /etc/aliases.db. sendmail and aliases.db are both owned
by root and smmsp.


It is "run" or "envoked" on-demand by sendmail to execute the line in the 
alias file; you'll only see it in ps when actually running.



the procmail man file states
-m
[...] If the rcfile is an absolute path starting with /etc/procmailrcs/ 
without backward references (i.e. the parent directory cannot be mentioned) 
procmail will, only if no security violations are found, take on the 
identity of the owner of the rcfile (or symbolic link). [...]


[that path may change in different versions of procmail]

That last sentence is important- check the ownership of /etc/procmailrc, I'm 
betting it's "baron"; that can happen easily when editing.


z!
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Lucio Chiappetti

On Sun, 15 May 2022, Jon Baron wrote:


I am trying to use spamassassin by running everything through
/etc/procmail,


Sorru, I do not understand what procmail and spamassassin, intended to 
process INCOMING mail, have to do with mailman which is SENDING OUT mail.


I still have a few almost-dead mailman lists on my machine, and I do use 
procmail to filter my personal incoming mail. It is a long time we have 
abandoned (been forced to abandon) spamassassin, but that was running on 
the institute MX, not on my own machine.


As far as I remember (after a first trial) spamassassin was run as a 
milter in sendmail.cf (the sendmail doc had s[pecial instructions).


Procmail instead is run (by me only on my own machine) via my own 
~/.procmailrc  (no need to pass through /etc/aliases or amy other system 
file). That occurs definining it as default deliveryi agent for the local 
mailer in sendmail.cf (see also sendmail doc).


My sendmail.cf has a section starting with

Mlocal,		P=/usr/bin/procmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qSPfhn09, 
S=EnvFromL/HdrFromL, R=EnvToL/HdrToL,

A=procmail -a $h -d $u

The default aliases needed for the mailman lists are kept in a separate 
alias file, and sendmail.cf concatenates it with the system one


O AliasFile=/etc/aliases,/etc/mail/mailman.aliases

(do NOT use the sendmail.cf lines I quote as they are ... go through the 
proper sendmail configuration)


--
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Corti 12 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/personal.html

"All that is google does not glitter
 Nor all who use alpine/procmail are lost"
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-05-16 at 12:32:54 UTC-0400 (Mon, 16 May 2022 18:32:54 +0200 
(CEST))

Lucio Chiappetti 
is rumored to have said:


On Sun, 15 May 2022, Jon Baron wrote:

I am trying to use spamassassin by running everything through

/etc/procmail,

Sorru, I do not understand what procmail and spamassassin, intended to 
process INCOMING mail, have to do with mailman which is SENDING OUT 
mail.


It is fairly common for SpamAssassin to be used on both incoming and 
outgoing mail, but obviously outgoing would need to use something other 
than procmail to call it.


I still have a few almost-dead mailman lists on my machine, and I do 
use procmail to filter my personal incoming mail. It is a long time we 
have abandoned (been forced to abandon) spamassassin, but that was 
running on the institute MX, not on my own machine.


As far as I remember (after a first trial) spamassassin was run as a 
milter in sendmail.cf (the sendmail doc had s[pecial instructions).


SpamAssassin can be used as a milter during the SMTP transaction or as a 
filter in the delivery pipeline via a delivery agent like procmail. 
Using procmail is generally suboptimal, but it may be the only mechanism 
available for an end user to deploy SA for their own mail without root 
access.


Also: procmail is antique abandonware that no one should use in 2022, 
but it can be very hard to replace.


--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Carl Zwanzig

Going back to the original email-

On 5/15/2022 4:35 PM, Jon Baron wrote:

"Group mismatch error. Mailman expected the mail wrapper script to be
executed as one of the following groups:
[mail, postfix, mailman, nobody, daemon],
but the system's mail server executed the mail script as group: "baron".
Try tweaking the mail server to run the script as one of these groups:
[mail, postfix, mailman, nobody, daemon],"


_Something_ (possibly procmail) was executing the mailman wrapper which 
produced the message above. When it was exec'd, for some reason the GID it 
was started under wasn't good.


One thing is odd about the message above, it says "one of the groups"
whereas some versions (eg 2.1.25) have "Mailman expected the %s wrapper to 
be executed as group" (singular). Could be that the OP's version is rather old.


Later,

z!



--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Mark Sapiro

On 5/16/22 16:18, Carl Zwanzig wrote:


One thing is odd about the message above, it says "one of the groups"
whereas some versions (eg 2.1.25) have "Mailman expected the %s wrapper 
to be executed as group" (singular). Could be that the OP's version is 
rather old.



That's a Debian 'feature'.

--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread dmitri maziuk

On 2022-05-16 3:31 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
...
SpamAssassin can be used as a milter during the SMTP transaction or as a 
filter in the delivery pipeline via a delivery agent like procmail. 
Using procmail is generally suboptimal, but it may be the only mechanism 
available for an end user to deploy SA for their own mail without root 
access.


You also get per-user thresholds and Bayes training etc.

Also: procmail is antique abandonware that no one should use in 2022, 
but it can be very hard to replace.


Courier maildrop works and has a somewhat saner syntax. However what 
does this have to do with mailman? -- IIRC I had to add an extra python 
file, edit something in another, and add a config setting, to have 
spamassassin work with MM2.


Dima



--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> Also: procmail is antique abandonware that no one should use in 2022, 
> but it can be very hard to replace.

I have a massive time investment in working procmail rules.
Use is not abandoned here. "If it aint broke dont fix it." ;-)

Cheers,
-- 
Julian Stacey  http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenVotes.uk
Arm Ukraine, Zap killer Putin, grain & fuel loss hits poorest.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Carl Zwanzig

On 5/16/2022 4:31 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

That's a Debian 'feature'.


Which then makes me wonder if there are other Debian "features" getting in 
the way.


z!
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Lucio Chiappetti writes:
 > On Sun, 15 May 2022, Jon Baron wrote:
 > 
 > > I am trying to use spamassassin by running everything through
 > > /etc/procmail,
 > 
 > Sorru, I do not understand what procmail and spamassassin, intended to 
 > process INCOMING mail, have to do with mailman which is SENDING OUT
 > mail.

I assumed the OP knows procmail fairly well, doesn't understand
milters (or whatever the equivalent is for $MTA), and is using a
pipeline like

sendmail | procmail | spamassassin && mailman

since the error message implied that mailman was started by procmail.
procmail may not be the tool of choice these days, but it should work.

Note that the error message mentions postfix several times; I'm not
sure that a sendmail cf is of much use to the OP.

Steve

--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/


[Mailman-Users] Re: group mismatch

2022-05-16 Thread Mark Sapiro

On 5/16/22 19:27, Carl Zwanzig wrote:

On 5/16/2022 4:31 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

That's a Debian 'feature'.


Which then makes me wonder if there are other Debian "features" getting 
in the way.



No. It's a simple group mismatch. The OP has to arrange for the process 
that pipes the mail to Mailman to run with an effective group of one of 
mail, postfix, mailman, nobody or daemon.


--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/
   https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/