Re: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] Release status

[Quentin Colombet via lldb-dev]

Hi Hans,

Thanks for pushing this forward.

> On Feb 18, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Hans Wennborg  wrote:
> 
> According to the schedule (e.g. on the right on llvm.org), we should
> have tagged the release by now, but we haven't, so we're officially
> behind schedule. I'm still optimistic that we can wrap this up pretty
> soon, though.
> 
> This is what's blocking us:
> 
> - PR26509: Crash in InnerLoopVectorizer::vectorizeLoop()
>  I'm waiting to hear what Cong comes up with, otherwise we can revert
> r255691 on the branch
> 
> - Shrink-wrapping vs TLS: Davide and Quentin are working on it

http://reviews.llvm.org/D17427

> 
> - PR26600: Loop vectorization creates an unsafe out-of-bounds load
>  There's a patch out: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17332
>  But no comments yet.. Hal?
> 
> - PR26564: Performance regression in AA
>  Patch in review, but it makes me a little uneasy since it's big and
> requires pulling in some refactoring patches too :-/
> 
> - ARM: fix VFP asm constraints: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17349
>  It's not a regression, but I'll take it if it lands real soon.
> 
> - PR26500: shrink-wrapping vs PPC
>  Patch in review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17294
>  Looks like it's moving along.
> 
> - PR26081: Assertion failed: (BitWidth == RHS.BitWidth && ...
>  I believe Matthias is working on it?
>  Will revert r252839 to unblock otherwise.
> 
> - PR26485: regression lowering TLS access in C on Darwin
>  Is no one looking? :-(

I’ll have a look.

Cheers,
-Quentin

> 
> If you're on one of these bugs or code reviews, etc., please try to
> prioritize them if you can.
> 
> Also, please let me know if my list is missing something.
> 
> Cheers,
> Hans

___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] Release status

[Quentin Colombet via lldb-dev]

Hi Hans,

> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Quentin Colombet via cfe-dev 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Hans,
> 
> Thanks for pushing this forward.
> 
>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Hans Wennborg > > wrote:
>> 
>> According to the schedule (e.g. on the right on llvm.org 
>> ), we should
>> have tagged the release by now, but we haven't, so we're officially
>> behind schedule. I'm still optimistic that we can wrap this up pretty
>> soon, though.
>> 
>> This is what's blocking us:
>> 
>> - PR26509: Crash in InnerLoopVectorizer::vectorizeLoop()
>> I'm waiting to hear what Cong comes up with, otherwise we can revert
>> r255691 on the branch
>> 
>> - Shrink-wrapping vs TLS: Davide and Quentin are working on it
> 
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D17427 
> 
>> 
>> - PR26600: Loop vectorization creates an unsafe out-of-bounds load
>> There's a patch out: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17332
>> But no comments yet.. Hal?
>> 
>> - PR26564: Performance regression in AA
>> Patch in review, but it makes me a little uneasy since it's big and
>> requires pulling in some refactoring patches too :-/
>> 
>> - ARM: fix VFP asm constraints: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17349
>> It's not a regression, but I'll take it if it lands real soon.
>> 
>> - PR26500: shrink-wrapping vs PPC
>> Patch in review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17294
>> Looks like it's moving along.
>> 
>> - PR26081: Assertion failed: (BitWidth == RHS.BitWidth && ...
>> I believe Matthias is working on it?
>> Will revert r252839 to unblock otherwise.
>> 
>> - PR26485: regression lowering TLS access in C on Darwin
>> Is no one looking? :-(

Should be fixed as revision 261384 on trunk.

I leave the merge to you.

Thanks,
-Quentin
> 
> I’ll have a look.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Quentin
> 
>> 
>> If you're on one of these bugs or code reviews, etc., please try to
>> prioritize them if you can.
>> 
>> Also, please let me know if my list is missing something.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Hans
> 
> ___
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org 
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev 
> 
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [4.0.0] Release notes nag email

[Quentin Colombet via lldb-dev]

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Hans Wennborg  wrote:
> 
> Dear everyone,
> 
> It's time for the six-monthly release notes nag email in preparation
> for the upcoming release.
> 
> As usual, the release notes are almost empty. Please help fill them
> with the work you've done in the past six months. The notes do get
> read by a lot of people, so I think they're worth some effort.
> 
> If you made any interesting changes in the last six months, or know
> someone who did, please write something about it. You can commit
> directly the release notes on the branch, or send me a patch and I'll
> happily commit it for you.
> 
> If you're responsible for the care of a specific target, please help
> give those notes some extra love.
> 
> 
> Here are some examples we might want to mention (thanks LLVM Weekly!).
> If you're cc'd on this email, you're mentioned below.
> 
> - Adam, do you want to add a mention of opt-viewer?
> 
> - Alex, do you want to put something about RISC-V in the notes?
> 
> - Anastasia, do you want to write something about OpenCL?
> 
> - Brendon, do you want to mention MachinePipeliner? IIUC, this is only
> used by Hexagon at the moment?
> 
> - Dan, do you want to put in an update about WebAssembly?
> 
> - David, do you want to write something about ADCE?
> 
> - Davide, do you want to write something about NewGVN?
> 
> - Dean, XRay started to land in this cycle. Do you want to mention it
> in the notes?
> 
> - Dylan, do you want to include an AVR status update?
> 
> - Eric, want to add a note about clang-change-namespace to the
> clang-tools-extra notes?
> 
> - Gor, do you want to add the status of co-routines support?
> 
> - Jacques, do you want to add a note about Lanai?
> 
> - James, do you want to mention the switch range reduction through
> rotation (r277325) optimization?
> 
> - Kate, do you want to mention the gread LLDB clang-formating or LLDB
> evolution in general?
> 
> - Matthias, should we write something about MIR? It's used quite a bit
> now, is that new for this release?
> 
> - Oren, do you want to add a note about the new x86 regcall and
> vectorcall conventions?
> 
> - Quentin, there's been a lot of work on the global instructions
> selector. Should we put a status update in the notes?

No, I don’t think we want to expose it to the users yet.

> 
> - Reid, do you want to include something about CodeView support?
> 
> - Richard, want to add something about Modules TS? And C++ in general of 
> course?
> 
> - Sebastian, can you write something about GVNHoist?
> 
> - Zach, do you want to add something about the clang-tidy VS plugin?
> 
> 
> Many thanks,
> Hans

___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev