Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

[Piotr Padlewski via lldb-dev]

2016-06-01 20:07 GMT+02:00 Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>:

> >> Regarding the issue of git sub-modules and keeping Clang/LLVM in sync,
> perhaps we should just put Clang and LLVM into a single git repository and
> add a CMake option to disable compilation of Clang (the same could be done
> for other LLVM sub-projects for which bisection and other nifty features
> require a single revision number to refer to code across projects).
> Keeping these projects in separate repositories is just more work, and I
> don't see what we're getting out of that extra effort.
>
> I'm not sure we will benefit from having *all* the subprojects in the
> single repository. This might affect pull / clone time significantly.
> Think about having lld, lldb along with llvm + clang in the single
> main repo.
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University
> ___
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>

I also find it bad idea to have it all in one repo. Right now when I
develope clang-tidy, I don't have to recompile clang often because most of
the commits in clang-estra doesn't require new clang fetures.
This is pretty nice if work on 2 core machine.

Piotr
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [4.0.0 Release] One week to the branch

[Piotr Padlewski via lldb-dev]

Can someone look at my devirtualization patch? It would be really great if
clang-4.0 would have it.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28137

2017-01-05 9:25 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev 
:

> This is just a quick reminder that branching for the upcoming release
> is scheduled for one week from now, 12 January 2017. Please try to
> avoid disruptive changes right before the branch.
>
> The full schedule was posted in a previous email [1] and also under
> "Upcoming Releases" on http://llvm.org/
>
> Note that when the branch happens, the trunk version will become 5.0.0
> as per the new versioning scheme [2].
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
>  [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/107805.html
>  [2] http://blog.llvm.org/2016/12/llvms-new-versioning-scheme.html
> ___
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev