[lldb-dev] [Bug 49046] Building lldb-vscode for windows is broken on 12.x

2021-02-09 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49046

Martin Storsjö  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Martin Storsjö  ---
Yep, the release branch builds fine now, thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 11.1.0-rc3 has been tagged

2021-02-09 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:15 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've tagged LLVM 11.1.0-rc3.  If there are no issues, then I'll be tagging
> the final release in 1 week.  Testers please test and upload binaries.

Windows is ready:

$ sha256sum LLVM-11.1.0-rc3*.exe
3f47b610fb629a4135ff1684e550bc8ec0aaf70653430a38523769024f0845af
LLVM-11.1.0-rc3-win32.exe
cbd2ea57f26aac99202218a4284fb02714f322b3898544d8f92af8db0bde8fea
LLVM-11.1.0-rc3-win64.exe


build_llvm_1110-rc3._bat_
Description: Binary data
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


Re: [lldb-dev] Help fixing deadlock in DWARF symbol preloading

2021-02-09 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev

On 05/02/2021 00:38, Jorge Gorbe Moya wrote:
Wouldn't it be preferable to try_lock in GetDescription (which is the 
one currently acquiring the mutex) instead?


I'd be uncomfortable with a function like GetDescription "randomly" 
doing nothing (returning an empty string, or whatever). OTOH, while it's 
definitely not ideal, I think I could live with ReportError not 
reporting anything (or skipping the description, or something) under 
some circumstances.


That said, I like both Greg's and Raphael's ideas on how to fix this 
(assuming they work)...


pl
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev